- FreeSWITCH-dev - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

Call For Open Source Awards 2008 Nominations
by Brian West 27 Apr '08

27 Apr '08

http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/04/open-source-award-nominations.html you know what to do! /b

3 3

lock unlock in PortAudio
by Sluschny, Thomas 25 Apr '08

25 Apr '08

Hi all, i use a very old version of freeswitch so i decided to give the version 1.0.pre4 (8124M) a try. I use WinXP and VS2005 Prof. At first a had to cope with some compile errors: 1. inet_pton() was not defined, i use Curl_inet_pton() for that now, but what is the "official" way 2. some lpc10_decode errors, where i had to define some helper variables And now my problem: i make a call from portaudio to a sip device, 1st call is ok, BUT if i do the same call again i hang in mod_PortAudio.c in line 1141: switch_mutex_lock(globals.device_lock); So it seams that someone doesnt unlock it :( Anybody else have seen this problem? Has it to do with the compile error? Thanx in advance, Thomas Sluschny

3 13

Major Issue with SIP BYE
by Jonathan Palley 23 Apr '08

23 Apr '08

All - There appears to be a major issue with the SIP BYE, in particular when you enable NDLB. I think this may be causing much confusion with NAT'd devices that has happened on the lists (when you can't get STUN) as FS does not behave as expected. In particular, the BYE sent from FS does not follow the contact port as set. See the following pastebin: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/4294 You'll notice, that the 407 goes to a different port than the BYE. It should not and never gets to the client as a result. I'll be in IRC to help debug. I've spent the last few hours digging into the sofia files to no avail.... Thank You! JP

2 1

freeswitch as a standard-alone sip server
by Pete Kay 18 Apr '08

18 Apr '08

Hi, I have a question for the creators of freeswitch. With freeswitch, people are still going to need Openser to do sip registering and it is understandable that a pure sip register is more efficient. The problem with Openser is that it is not that easy to config as compared to freeswitch. So, I am wondering does it make sense for use part of the current freeswitch function to just make a "freeser" ( for pure sip registration) so that users can enjoy an efficient sip server and the ease-of-use from the freeswitch design? Just a wide thought. Regards, Pete

4 9

Dictation SIP/VOIP
by Robert Clayton 18 Apr '08

18 Apr '08

Devs, I am new to Freeswitch and have two questions. 1) I am considering attempting to develop an application for SIP/VOIP dictation do you have any suggestions? 2) I am unable to find any list of functionality in the upcoming version 1.0 would it to be best to wait until the new release? Bob

3 4

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch
by Brian West 16 Apr '08

16 Apr '08

Please digg and pass on http://digg.com/software/How_does_FreeSWITCH_compare_to_Asterisk /b

1 0

Man what a news day!
by Brian West 16 Apr '08

16 Apr '08

http://digg.com/software/HD_Telephony_Hip_or_Hype_2 Digg it! Brian West sip:brian@freeswitch.org

3 2

FreeSWITCH on Digg Again please check it out and Digg it!
by Brian West 14 Apr '08

14 Apr '08

Here you go guys! http://digg.com/software/Freeswitch_Poised_to_Shake_Up_the_Open_Source_VoIP… Thanks, Brian West sip:brian@freeswitch.org

2 1

Registration Expiration Problem with NATHACK
by Jonathan Palley 14 Apr '08

14 Apr '08

Hi - There is a small bug with registration expiration and nathack. There is an easy fix but the behavior is unexpected and I believe there is a chance it may point to a larger problem. So, I bring it up here. The bug: sofia_reg.c has the function sofia_reg_check_expire which is called once a minute to clean out expired registrations from the database. On line 263: switch_snprintf(sql, sizeof(sql), "delete from sip_registrations where expires > 0 and expires <= %ld", (long) now); It deletes expired registrations. Later in the function we search for NATHACK user agents to send them an OPTIONS for the NAT keep alive. Line 282: switch_snprintf(sql, sizeof(sql), "select * from sip_registrations where status like '%%NATHACK%%'"); Here's the BUG: Line 282 selects records in the database that are supposed to be deleted in 263. This means you send NAT keep alive to agents that have already expired. The registrations are then cleared out of the db once this function completes. Clearly there is some sort of lock around the db that prevents the delete from occurring when the sql function is actually called. Now, we can solve the immediate bug by changing the SQL statement in Line 282 to not select expired registrations...but is the sqlite supposed to lock like this? Thanks - JP

2 1

TBCT Followup
by Michael Collins 12 Apr '08

12 Apr '08

FYI, I spoke with my primary carrier - TWTC - and they report that there are no additional costs for setting up TBCT functionality. However, they require a provisioning request (aka paperwork) so I can't set it up right away. I'll probably get it set up in the next few months so that I can play with it using my NEC 2400 or possibly my IAT dialer... When I go to sign the paperwork that's when I'll get all the nitty-gritty details like how many concurrent calls, etc. I'll report back to the lists when I have that info. -MC

1 0