- FreeSWITCH-dev - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

is there any info abount which git tag/ Freeswitch release is stable?
by Anton VG 09 May '11

09 May '11

Guys, here is a little bit of critics, There is no info - what version of freeswitch should be used in production. the wiki pages http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide#Linux_and_Unix says that latest GIT is "very" stable, but in 5 pulls i did, 2 times I immediately hit regressions: first time - non working DNS resolver in mod_sofia second - broken ESL outbound (as of this night) at the same time, it's mentioned that 1.0.6 is not the "latest stable" anymore, but in files, there is only 1.0.6 so it would be very helpful if there is some way to find out, what is the latest GIT tag or release could be downloaded to be usable, it's just not possible while in development, to have GIT always stable. None can do it, so there really should be atleast "testing" tag/brunch, which is known working over serveral weeks (debian testing can be an example) Hope this piece of critics not insults anyone, FS is a great stuff, Regards, Anton.

5 6

skypopen.ko compile failed for 2.6.36.4
by Anton VG 09 May '11

09 May '11

Hi Giovanni, Seems you do not support yet 2.6.36 kernel? Could you please have a look, maybe it needs a trivial change to compile under 2.6.36 ? root@lab3:/usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_skypopen/oss# make make -C /lib/modules/2.6.36.4/build M=/usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_skypopen/oss LDDINC=/usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_skypopen/oss/../include modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.36.4' CC [M] /usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_skypopen/oss/main.o /usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_skypopen/oss/main.c:315: error: unknown field ‘ioctl’ specified in initializer /usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_skypopen/oss/main.c:315: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type make[2]: *** [/usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_skypopen/oss/main.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_module_/usr/src/freeswitch/src/mod/endpoints/mod_skypopen/oss] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.36.4' make: *** [modules] Error 2 Sincerely, Anton.

2 6

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] Antw.: is there any info abount which git tag/ Freeswitch release is stable?
by Paul Cupis 08 May '11

08 May '11

On 08/05/11 11:36, Michal Bielicki wrote: > Debian dies Not accept packages without versions. Git releases are not accepted This is not true. There have been efforts to get FreeSWITCH packages inside Debian, but I think the biggest issues are how to built it against separately packaged libraries rather than using in-tree libraries. http://bugs.debian.org/389591 Regards,

3 4

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] Antw.: is there any info abount which git tag/ Freeswitch release is stable?
by Anton VG 08 May '11

08 May '11

hm, If I'm not wrong, there was a number of packages in debian, which was updated from svn previous stable had ffmpeg or mplayer from svn in current stable i see libeina-svn-03 and 05 so it seems it accepts 2011/5/8 Michal Bielicki <michal.bielicki(a)seventhsignal.de>: > Debian dies Not accept packages without versions. Git releases are not > accepted > > Gesendet mit meinem HTC > > ----- Reply message ----- > Von: "Anton VG" <anton.vazir(a)gmail.com> > An: <freeswitch-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > Betreff: [Freeswitch-dev] is there any info abount which git tag/ Freeswitch > release is stable? > Datum: So., Mai. 8, 2011 10:38 > > > João, > your point is clear, and for sure it is very impressive, what work can > be done by that modest > number of developers. Don't get me wrong, there was no intention to > sound "demanding", just thoughts. > I myself watching FS progress from the moment Anthony have announced it. > FS do not have backing company as some other, this makes some things a > little more difficult > But I trust it would be in a great benefit for FS to gain bigger > community, and little more organization would not bother... > Though it requires men power, which seems is just not enough for the moment. > > BTW, somehow strange, FS is not included to Debian distro, not even in > UNSTABLE, although, FS support a debian build out of GIT with no extra > work. > Just Debian is one of the most recognized distro for servers, and > having FS included would add to it's popularity quite sufficiently. > Is there no willing maintainer or some other reason? > > BR, > Anton. > > 2011/5/8 João Mesquita <jmesquita(a)freeswitch.org>: >> Anton, I consider myself a part of this community as well as an active >> contributor. Whoever knows me personally or has spoken to me for more then >> 5 >> minutes is able to tell the passion that I hold for OSS and, of course, >> FreeSWITCH. >> Maybe this passion is too blindly but I believe that there are some >> importants points being overseen here by most of those who write these >> types >> of email I see pop up on the mailing list every now and again. >> 1. FreeSWITCH's core is developed mainly by 3 or 4 guys. We are talking >> about less then 5 people where one of them is the person who has made over >> 60% of the code in there. >> 2. FreeSWITCH does not generate direct profit for anyone who has been >> actively contributing that I know of. We all add a twist to the product >> and >> that is where our value added lies on. >> 3. No one is working for no one, this is one of the things that makes it a >> community instead of a company. >> My point is that it can be a little offending when I see those comments >> that >> are almost demanding and that doesn't have a proposition to go with. >> I don't want to make any enemies and don't intend to offend either, but >> instead of making a short response to this critic, I would think that we >> can >> all benefit from more ppl helping on the project. Maybe the right question >> could have been, who is the tester on the project and how can I help test >> to >> get a stable branch? >> >> I am really sorry if I seem aggressive, it is not the intention. I simply >> took the opportunity of this email to write about my feelings towards >> emails >> like those and not yours exclusively. >> >> I hope my critics do not offend anyone. :-) >> Regards, >> João Mesquita >> >> >> >> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Anthony Minessale >> <anthony.minessale(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> current HEAD is a candidate for a stable branch. >>> >>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Daniel Bryars >>> <daniel.bryars(a)aeriandi.com> wrote: >>> > I don't think it's impossible - just difficult. My view is based on my >>> > experience where we "almost" continuously deploy our web sites to our >>> > live >>> > environment; we continuously deploy after every check in (waiting 15 >>> > minutes >>> > for a quiescent period) to stage and then manually push to live weekly >>> > (it >>> > used to be ad hoc, now it's every week, I hope soon it will be every >>> > day). >>> > To do this we've needed key unit tests (not full coverage by any means) >>> > and >>> > automated regression testing. And, most importantly, a change in >>> > developer >>> > mind set (we now know that as soon as we check in some code it's going >>> > to >>> > wind itself up on a live machine with live customers without any QA >>> > team to >>> > rely on). >>> > >>> > We're building a new solution with FS (on Windows) and ideally would >>> > like to adopt the same strategy. Ideally I don't want a "stable >>> > release" I >>> > want to always pull the latest version and run that in production. >>> > >>> > Right now for our FS project we've got the build process deploying to >>> > our stage environment (no live customers yet) using some Powershell >>> > scripts >>> > and Microsoft Web Deploy. We intend to build on this over the next 4 to >>> > 6 >>> > weeks. The plan is to pull from GIT, apply our own regression tests and >>> > if >>> > they pass push out to live (automatically). >>> > >>> > Currently we have plans to test only the functionality which we >>> > actually >>> > use - but depending on how things go I'm up for increasing the coverage >>> > and >>> > providing the results of our tests publicly. Perhaps this will provide >>> > a >>> > useful guide to the current state of the build and help provide what >>> > you're >>> > asking for (but I can only do this on Windows.) >>> > >>> > I'll keep you posted with our progress, (and I'll also be at the next >>> > ClueCon conference - if you're going then perhaps we can have a little >>> > brainstorm then.) >>> > >>> > Daniel >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: freeswitch-dev-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org >>> > [mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anton >>> > VG >>> > Sent: 07 May 2011 08:13 >>> > To: freeswitch-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org >>> > Subject: [Freeswitch-dev] is there any info abount which git tag/ >>> > Freeswitch release is stable? >>> > >>> > Guys, here is a little bit of critics, >>> > >>> > There is no info - what version of freeswitch should be used in >>> > production. >>> > the wiki pages >>> > >>> > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide >>> > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide#Linux_and_Unix >>> > >>> > says that latest GIT is "very" stable, but in 5 pulls i did, 2 times I >>> > immediately hit regressions: >>> > first time - non working DNS resolver in mod_sofia second - broken ESL >>> > outbound (as of this night) >>> > >>> > at the same time, it's mentioned that 1.0.6 is not the "latest stable" >>> > anymore, but in files, there is only 1.0.6 >>> > >>> > so it would be very helpful if there is some way to find out, what is >>> > the latest GIT tag or release could be downloaded to be usable, it's >>> > just >>> > not possible while in development, to have GIT always stable. None can >>> > do >>> > it, so there really should be atleast "testing" tag/brunch, which is >>> > known >>> > working over serveral weeks (debian testing can be an example) >>> > >>> > Hope this piece of critics not insults anyone, FS is a great stuff, >>> > Regards, Anton. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list >>> > FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org >>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >>> > http://www.freeswitch.org >>> > >>> > >>> > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity >>> > to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >>> > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or >>> > taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or >>> > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you >>> > received >>> > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from >>> > your computer. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list >>> > FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org >>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >>> > http://www.freeswitch.org >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Anthony Minessale II >>> >>> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >>> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire >>> >>> AIM: anthm >>> MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com >>> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com >>> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >>> >>> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >>> sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org >>> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org >>> pstn:+19193869900 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list >>> FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list > FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list > FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev > http://www.freeswitch.org > >

1 0

Antw.: is there any info abount which git tag/ Freeswitch release is stable?
by Michal Bielicki 08 May '11

08 May '11

Debian dies Not accept packages without versions. Git releases are not accepted Gesendet mit meinem HTC ----- Reply message ----- Von: "Anton VG" <anton.vazir(a)gmail.com> An: <freeswitch-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org> Betreff: [Freeswitch-dev] is there any info abount which git tag/ Freeswitch release is stable? Datum: So., Mai. 8, 2011 10:38 João, your point is clear, and for sure it is very impressive, what work can be done by that modest number of developers. Don't get me wrong, there was no intention to sound "demanding", just thoughts. I myself watching FS progress from the moment Anthony have announced it. FS do not have backing company as some other, this makes some things a little more difficult But I trust it would be in a great benefit for FS to gain bigger community, and little more organization would not bother... Though it requires men power, which seems is just not enough for the moment. BTW, somehow strange, FS is not included to Debian distro, not even in UNSTABLE, although, FS support a debian build out of GIT with no extra work. Just Debian is one of the most recognized distro for servers, and having FS included would add to it's popularity quite sufficiently. Is there no willing maintainer or some other reason? BR, Anton. 2011/5/8 João Mesquita <jmesquita(a)freeswitch.org>: > Anton, I consider myself a part of this community as well as an active > contributor. Whoever knows me personally or has spoken to me for more then 5 > minutes is able to tell the passion that I hold for OSS and, of course, > FreeSWITCH. > Maybe this passion is too blindly but I believe that there are some > importants points being overseen here by most of those who write these types > of email I see pop up on the mailing list every now and again. > 1. FreeSWITCH's core is developed mainly by 3 or 4 guys. We are talking > about less then 5 people where one of them is the person who has made over > 60% of the code in there. > 2. FreeSWITCH does not generate direct profit for anyone who has been > actively contributing that I know of. We all add a twist to the product and > that is where our value added lies on. > 3. No one is working for no one, this is one of the things that makes it a > community instead of a company. > My point is that it can be a little offending when I see those comments that > are almost demanding and that doesn't have a proposition to go with. > I don't want to make any enemies and don't intend to offend either, but > instead of making a short response to this critic, I would think that we can > all benefit from more ppl helping on the project. Maybe the right question > could have been, who is the tester on the project and how can I help test to > get a stable branch? > > I am really sorry if I seem aggressive, it is not the intention. I simply > took the opportunity of this email to write about my feelings towards emails > like those and not yours exclusively. > > I hope my critics do not offend anyone. :-) > Regards, > João Mesquita > > > > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Anthony Minessale > <anthony.minessale(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> current HEAD is a candidate for a stable branch. >> >> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Daniel Bryars >> <daniel.bryars(a)aeriandi.com> wrote: >> > I don't think it's impossible - just difficult. My view is based on my >> > experience where we "almost" continuously deploy our web sites to our live >> > environment; we continuously deploy after every check in (waiting 15 minutes >> > for a quiescent period) to stage and then manually push to live weekly (it >> > used to be ad hoc, now it's every week, I hope soon it will be every day). >> > To do this we've needed key unit tests (not full coverage by any means) and >> > automated regression testing. And, most importantly, a change in developer >> > mind set (we now know that as soon as we check in some code it's going to >> > wind itself up on a live machine with live customers without any QA team to >> > rely on). >> > >> > We're building a new solution with FS (on Windows) and ideally would >> > like to adopt the same strategy. Ideally I don't want a "stable release" I >> > want to always pull the latest version and run that in production. >> > >> > Right now for our FS project we've got the build process deploying to >> > our stage environment (no live customers yet) using some Powershell scripts >> > and Microsoft Web Deploy. We intend to build on this over the next 4 to 6 >> > weeks. The plan is to pull from GIT, apply our own regression tests and if >> > they pass push out to live (automatically). >> > >> > Currently we have plans to test only the functionality which we actually >> > use - but depending on how things go I'm up for increasing the coverage and >> > providing the results of our tests publicly. Perhaps this will provide a >> > useful guide to the current state of the build and help provide what you're >> > asking for (but I can only do this on Windows.) >> > >> > I'll keep you posted with our progress, (and I'll also be at the next >> > ClueCon conference - if you're going then perhaps we can have a little >> > brainstorm then.) >> > >> > Daniel >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: freeswitch-dev-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org >> > [mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anton VG >> > Sent: 07 May 2011 08:13 >> > To: freeswitch-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org >> > Subject: [Freeswitch-dev] is there any info abount which git tag/ >> > Freeswitch release is stable? >> > >> > Guys, here is a little bit of critics, >> > >> > There is no info - what version of freeswitch should be used in >> > production. >> > the wiki pages >> > >> > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide >> > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide#Linux_and_Unix >> > >> > says that latest GIT is "very" stable, but in 5 pulls i did, 2 times I >> > immediately hit regressions: >> > first time - non working DNS resolver in mod_sofia second - broken ESL >> > outbound (as of this night) >> > >> > at the same time, it's mentioned that 1.0.6 is not the "latest stable" >> > anymore, but in files, there is only 1.0.6 >> > >> > so it would be very helpful if there is some way to find out, what is >> > the latest GIT tag or release could be downloaded to be usable, it's just >> > not possible while in development, to have GIT always stable. None can do >> > it, so there really should be atleast "testing" tag/brunch, which is known >> > working over serveral weeks (debian testing can be an example) >> > >> > Hope this piece of critics not insults anyone, FS is a great stuff, >> > Regards, Anton. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity >> > to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >> > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or >> > taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or >> > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you >> > received >> > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from >> > your computer. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list >> > FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Anthony Minessale II >> >> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire >> >> AIM: anthm >> MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com >> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com >> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >> >> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >> sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org >> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org >> pstn:+19193869900 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list > FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev(a)lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org

1 0

FreeSWITCH Conference Call Today
by Michael Collins 04 May '11

04 May '11

Hey folks, We're having an easy conference call today. The agenda is light: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FS_weekly_2011_05_04 Feel free to join and hang out with us! -MC

1 0

FreeSWITCH Cookbook: resources
by Michael Collins 03 May '11

03 May '11

Hello all! The response to my request for reviewers is overwhelming - thank you so much! We have more than enough reviewers. However, any of you who wish to read the draft and offer feedback are still welcome to do so. You just won't be "official" Packt reviewers. I'd like to focus attention on testing resources. For those of you who have data center resources and such I would like to ask for your assistance. It would be helpful to have a spare server (low power == okay, cuz it's only for a few simultaneous calls max) with a DID & public IP address. This will help us test various scenarios and make sure that we can do box2box and NAT scenarios. Please contact me off list if you have any servers, DIDs, etc. that could be used for this purpose. Thanks again to everyone who has volunteered to help! I would much rather have to sift through dozens of emails from people who want to help than have to keep begging and have no one step up. ;) You guys are awesome - keep up the good work. -MC

3 2

NEW skypopen installer and easy Skype client download, Skype calls on FreeSWITCH in one minute
by Giovanni Maruzzelli 30 Apr '11

30 Apr '11

Dear FreeSWITCHers, after a fair amount of effort, I ended up with a new way to install and use mod_skypopen on Linux. No more looking around the internet for the lost 2.0.0.72 Skype client for ALSA. First, we can use the readily available Skype client for OSS. (added benefit: no more need for ALSA driver. I wrote skypopen.ko OSS driver, that's very easy to compile and install, and do not need to mess with the operating system installation.) Second, I wrote an installer that automatically do all the tedious work for you: download and install the skype client, create the config directory for Skype clients, create the config file for mod_skypopen, create the script that launches the Skype clients. I hope those improvements will lower the barriers for Skype calls on FreeSWITCH. Actually is ludicrously simple now, and after you compile FreeSWITCH, mod_skypopen and the skypopen.ko OSS driver it will take like less than one minute to have a complete installation of mod_skypopen ready to make and receive calls. All automatic, no more need to fiddle around with the Skype client download, configurations, authorization, etc. Is all well tested, but maybe there are still some bugs, and maybe the docs are not clear/easy enough. Please have a look at the new and improved wiki page and let me know what do you think about (and maybe test the procedures). http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_skypopen_Skype_Endpoint_and_Trunk http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_skypopen_Skype_Endpoint_and_Trunk#Linux http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_skypopen_Skype_Endpoint_and_Trunk#Inter… You must update to the latest git to have all the goodies. Thank you all for your support, -giovanni -- Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618

5 8

Reviewers needed: FreeSWITCH Cookbook
by Michael Collins 29 Apr '11

29 Apr '11

Hello, As you know we are working on a FreeSWITCH Cookbook for Packt Publishing. We are in need of 3 or 4 capable reviewers. Please contact me off list if you want to help and meet these qualifications: * Read and write English fluently * Have at least one instance of FreeSWITCH (or a sandbox) where you can test each recipe * Have time to read and try all the recipes in the book * Can offer useful feedback and proofreading * Preferably have a later version of MS Word for editing If you meet the above qualifications and would like to help out then please contact me off list for more information. Thanks, MC

1 0

mod_voicemail new API functions
by João Mesquita 29 Apr '11

29 Apr '11

Guys, I see that Moc has added new API functions to set preferences to the mailbox. Those work great and are awesome, but I think there is one small feature missing. Shouldn't we be able to remove the greetings instead of just setting new ones so that mod_voicemail restores it's original configuration? I don't have any problem hacking in the feature, I am just making sure I am not going to do something that is already in there and that I have overlooked before. Thanks! João Mesquita

1 0