March 2010 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

Invalid Boost Version 103 Expecting 100
by velusamy Krishnan 30 Mar '10

30 Mar '10

Dear all, Compiled the wanpipe with freeswitch and configured it. When I originate a call from the freeswitch command line it said the following error and got core dump. freeswitch@IVRFreeSWITCH> originate openzap/smg_prid/a/9940464753 &park() 2010-03-24 13:46:45.862315 [WARNING] sangoma_boost_client.c:246 TX EVENT (P): SYSTEM_RESTART:(87) [w1g1] Rc=0 CSid=0 Seq=0 2010-03-24 13:46:45.862315 [CRIT] sangoma_boost_client.c:355 Invalid Boost Version 103 Expecting 100 2010-03-24 13:46:45.862315 [CRIT] sangoma_boost_client.c:369 Critical Error: PQ Invalid Event lenght from boost rxlen=27 evsz=1027 NOTE: freeswitch version is 1.0.trunk ( 17084) wanpipe version is 3.5.8.6. smg_prid version is 1.63 Please help me......... Thanks..

3 5

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Some question about mod_fifo ??
by Nguyễn Mạnh Hùng 30 Mar '10

30 Mar '10

Hi SeVen Du. Thank for your reply. About question 2: I think in real life (call center), supporters in queue must be known the real Caller_ID_number of customers. If caller_id_number is replated by 'fifo+<fifo_name>', caller_id_number will be invaluable informations. So, Is there anyway to preserve Caller_ID_number from the invaluable change as origination_caller_id_name=Queue,origination_caller_id_number='fifo+test_fifo'. Best regard ! > Hi all. > > I am newbegin and have 2 question as follow > > 1. Can config mod_fifo with member in external register ??? > > In my lab, i have OpenSIP as Proxy server and Register server and > Freeswitch as media server config mod_fifo (queue) > > User with extension 1010 is registerd with OpenSIPS server, queue 8000 is > media service in freeswitch server. Can i config mod_fifo in freeswitch > with member in Opensips server ? > > I try config in /fifo.conf.xml like > > > lag="5">{fifo_member_wait=nowait}user/1010@opensips_IP > > but it not work. > because it's not a valid dialstring. try sofia/ / instead of user/ it's only a dialstring, so, if you can make "originate " work then fifo should work. > Someone done this with opensips or another register server, please post some > guide. > > > > 2. With mod_fifo: caller_id_name and caller_id_number will be replated by > default config: > > origination_caller_id_name=Queue,origination_caller_id_number='fifo+test_fifo'. > So, if caller_id_number is 0123456.. it will be replates wit > 'fifo+test_fifo'. I want origination_caller_id_number has value is > 0123456.. > no, because you don't know which caller will actually been bridged to which agent before the agent actually answer the call. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

2 1

Experience with FreeSWITCH & Turnserver.org ?
by RobertT 30 Mar '10

30 Mar '10

I chose this kind of setup, because I wanted to enforce ICE session negotiation between clients, that could possibly call from various kinds of NATs. sip_nat_detected tells you if the caller is residing behind NAT, but you don't know anything about another party yet. It might be hidden with NAT as well. Best regards, RobertT.

1 0

encrypted RTP
by Woody Dickson 30 Mar '10

30 Mar '10

Hi, Is there anyway to transport RTP between FS and an endpoint in such a way that the the FS server is going to defined a key and only the endpoint that has the correct key can send and receive RTP from Freeswitch? Is there anyway to something that is similar? thanks, woody

3 4

Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum?
by Ben Langfeld 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

"So, I'm in favour of a Web interface but strongly against anything that wouldn't also allow mailing list participation or offer NNTP access. That is, I'm in favour of diversity and opposed to excluding people by forcing everyone to use a single user interface - one provided by forum software." So forum software with a "Subscribe to all by email" option and/or similar RSS feed? Would that cover all the bases? Regards, Ben Langfeld Wave > Email On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 2:31 AM, < freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org> wrote: > Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to > freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freeswitch-users-owner(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? (Ben Langfeld) > 2. Big conferences (David Knell) > 3. Re: FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? (Jason White) > 4. Re: FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? (Madovsky) > 5. Re: FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? (Wellie Chao) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ben Langfeld <ben(a)langfeld.co.uk> > To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:44:02 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? > There may be a forum, but such a thing cannot be expected to succeed if > there's competition with an already established list. Such a thing would > have to replace the mailing list to succeed. I believe this would help the > FreeSWITCH effort amongst newer users and lead to much faster growth. The > barrier to entry of a mailing list is a tad too high for some since it > presents an impression, justified or not, that the list is where the elite > hang out and is off-limits for newbies, whereas with a tidier forum setup > that would allow for a "Newbies Corner" might avoid this. Mailing lists are > showing their age these days - as demonstrated by the difficulty in > responding to this on digest mode - I have to strip away every other thread > first. > > I'm convinced that a full shift to newer, better organised and more > friendly technology would only be a good thing for the FreeSWITCH project. > Does anyone agree, or am I out on my own on this one? > > Regards, > Ben Langfeld > > Wave > Email > > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:11 AM, < > freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org> wrote: > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Michael S Collins <msc(a)freeswitch.org> >> To: "freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org" < >> freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> >> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:54:15 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? >> There *IS* a forum. A volunteer set it up a few years ago and promised to >> maintain it. The fact that you can't find it is proof positive that a forum >> just isn't the best choice for this particular online community. I'd say the >> nabble site is your best option. >> >> -MC >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:51 AM, William Suffill <william.suffill(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> It's been brought up before. I don't recall exactly all the +/- discussed >> but there are some alternatives for the user depending on their preference. >> Digest can get a bit annoying in high volume. The list is archived in >> various places (Gmane.org, <http://nabble.com>nabble.com) >> >> Nabble does provide a forum style interface to the current list if you >> rather follow it that way. >> <http://n2.nabble.com/freeswitch-users-f2379917.html> >> http://n2.nabble.com/freeswitch-users-f2379917.html >> "This forum is an archive for the mailing list: *<freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> >> freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org* (more options<http://n2.nabble.com/mailing_list/MailingListOptions.jtp?forum=2379917>) >> Messages posted here will be sent to this mailing list." >> >> -- W >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Knell <dave(a)3c.co.uk> > To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:50:51 -0600 > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Big conferences > Hi - > > I've seen the odd query on the list about building and scaling large > audio conferences. Given that most callers will be listen-only, it's > possible to scale up by transmitting a single RTP stream to multiple > callers. > > Here's some proof-of-concept code, which roughly halves the CPU usage > for a 200-user (plus one speaker) conference, written in that highest of > performance languages, Perl: > http://www.softivr.com/wiki/index.php/HP_Conferencing > > --Dave > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jason White <jason(a)jasonjgw.net> > To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:13:59 +1100 > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? > Ben Langfeld <ben(a)langfeld.co.uk> wrote: > > There may be a forum, but such a thing cannot be expected to succeed if > > there's competition with an already established list. Such a thing would > > have to replace the mailing list to succeed. I believe this would help > the > > FreeSWITCH effort amongst newer users and lead to much faster growth. The > > barrier to entry of a mailing list is a tad too high for some since it > > presents an impression, justified or not, that the list is where the > elite > > hang out and is off-limits for newbies, whereas with a tidier forum setup > > that would allow for a "Newbies Corner" might avoid this. Mailing lists > are > > showing their age these days - as demonstrated by the difficulty in > > responding to this on digest mode - I have to strip away every other > thread > > first. > > Experienced users of mailing lists don't use digest mode. They filter the > mailing list into its own mail folder and use features of their mail user > agent to read it efficiently, e.g., threaded display. > > I support to the existence of a Web interface to the mailing list, but I > would > strongly object to any attempt to replace the list with a "Web forum", for > a > number of reasons. In particular, if this were to happen, I know that I > would > find it difficult to participate, perhaps impossible. > > With a mailing list, I have a choice of software with which to read it, and > I > have chosen carefully based on my accessibility needs and personal > preferences > so that I can read and interact with mail efficiently. The problem with a > Web > forum is that I have no choice: I would have to use a Web-based interface > to > read and post messages, moreover, a Web interface provided by the forum > itself. Unfortunately, Web interfaces can't match my customized mail > environment for productivity; some of them are highly inaccessible to > people > with disabilities, and they don't offer the flexibility of choosing and > customizing one's own client software that mailing lists and NNTP > newsgroups > provide. Web fora are slow and difficult for me to use, at best, and > impossible at worst, and I doubt that I am alone here. > > So, I'm in favour of a Web interface but strongly against anything that > wouldn't also allow mailing list participation or offer NNTP access. That > is, > I'm in favour of diversity and opposed to excluding people by forcing > everyone > to use a single user interface - one provided by forum software. > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Madovsky" <infos(a)madovsky.org> > To: <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:15:48 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? > I agree, but after 2 months iregistered > I must to confess that I really like this kind of anarchy. > It helps newbies to go quickly in the mood, elite to work > their human feels and sometimes fresh energy and ideas can also help > the old elite to push some intensity... > > Regards > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Ben Langfeld <ben(a)langfeld.co.uk> > *To:* freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > *Sent:* Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:44 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a > forum? > > There may be a forum, but such a thing cannot be expected to succeed if > there's competition with an already established list. Such a thing would > have to replace the mailing list to succeed. I believe this would help the > FreeSWITCH effort amongst newer users and lead to much faster growth. The > barrier to entry of a mailing list is a tad too high for some since it > presents an impression, justified or not, that the list is where the elite > hang out and is off-limits for newbies, whereas with a tidier forum setup > that would allow for a "Newbies Corner" might avoid this. Mailing lists are > showing their age these days - as demonstrated by the difficulty in > responding to this on digest mode - I have to strip away every other thread > first. > > I'm convinced that a full shift to newer, better organised and more > friendly technology would only be a good thing for the FreeSWITCH project. > Does anyone agree, or am I out on my own on this one? > > Regards, > Ben Langfeld > > Wave > Email > > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:11 AM, < > freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org> wrote: > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Michael S Collins <msc(a)freeswitch.org> >> To: "freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org" < >> freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> >> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:54:15 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? >> There *IS* a forum. A volunteer set it up a few years ago and promised >> to maintain it. The fact that you can't find it is proof positive that a >> forum just isn't the best choice for this particular online community. I'd >> say the nabble site is your best option. >> >> -MC >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:51 AM, William Suffill <william.suffill(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> It's been brought up before. I don't recall exactly all the +/- >> discussed but there are some alternatives for the user depending on their >> preference. Digest can get a bit annoying in high volume. The list is >> archived in various places (Gmane.org, <http://nabble.com>nabble.com) >> >> Nabble does provide a forum style interface to the current list if you >> rather follow it that way. >> <http://n2.nabble.com/freeswitch-users-f2379917.html> >> http://n2.nabble.com/freeswitch-users-f2379917.html >> "This forum is an archive for the mailing list: *<freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> >> freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org* (more options<http://n2.nabble.com/mailing_list/MailingListOptions.jtp?forum=2379917>) >> Messages posted here will be sent to this mailing list." >> >> -- W >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Wellie Chao <wchao(a)yahoo.com> > To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:30:59 -0400 (EDT) > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? > I agree pretty strongly with Jason's viewpoint, and for the very same > reasons. Not against a web forum, but other options (such as web forum) > ought to be additional as opposed to in place of. Mailing lists might be > "showing their age", but that's because they work. Procmail + Alpine works > great, or an NNTP client is also perfectly fine. For people who want web > access, there are web interfaces (like Nabble). > > > ------------------------------------- > Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:13:59 +1100 > From: Jason White <jason(a)jasonjgw.net> > Reply-To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH Mailing List - Why not a forum? > > Ben Langfeld <ben(a)langfeld.co.uk> wrote: > > There may be a forum, but such a thing cannot be expected to succeed if > > there's competition with an already established list. Such a thing would > > have to replace the mailing list to succeed. I believe this would help > the > > FreeSWITCH effort amongst newer users and lead to much faster growth. The > > barrier to entry of a mailing list is a tad too high for some since it > > presents an impression, justified or not, that the list is where the > elite > > hang out and is off-limits for newbies, whereas with a tidier forum setup > > that would allow for a "Newbies Corner" might avoid this. Mailing lists > are > > showing their age these days - as demonstrated by the difficulty in > > responding to this on digest mode - I have to strip away every other > thread > > first. > > Experienced users of mailing lists don't use digest mode. They filter the > mailing list into its own mail folder and use features of their mail user > agent to read it efficiently, e.g., threaded display. > > I support to the existence of a Web interface to the mailing list, but I > would > strongly object to any attempt to replace the list with a "Web forum", for > a > number of reasons. In particular, if this were to happen, I know that I > would > find it difficult to participate, perhaps impossible. > > With a mailing list, I have a choice of software with which to read it, and > I > have chosen carefully based on my accessibility needs and personal > preferences > so that I can read and interact with mail efficiently. The problem with a > Web > forum is that I have no choice: I would have to use a Web-based interface > to > read and post messages, moreover, a Web interface provided by the forum > itself. Unfortunately, Web interfaces can't match my customized mail > environment for productivity; some of them are highly inaccessible to > people > with disabilities, and they don't offer the flexibility of choosing and > customizing one's own client software that mailing lists and NNTP > newsgroups > provide. Web fora are slow and difficult for me to use, at best, and > impossible at worst, and I doubt that I am alone here. > > So, I'm in favour of a Web interface but strongly against anything that > wouldn't also allow mailing list participation or offer NNTP access. That > is, > I'm in favour of diversity and opposed to excluding people by forcing > everyone > to use a single user interface - one provided by forum software. > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > >

6 8

domain instead of ip address on placed call...
by Gerard Braad 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

Hello Guys, Have an issue with calls. I am testing this different devices (nokia n900, nokia e60, nokia n810, ekiga, sipura spa3000) and have similar results between them. When I place a call from a device registered as 1001(a)host.com to 1002(a)host.com, it will show up at the other end (1002) as 1001(a)12.34.56.78 Can the IP address be replaced by the domain FQDN of the callers domain/acount? greets, Gerard

2 1

media_bug_answer_req not working for me
by Fraser Redmond 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

Hi, Has anyone used media_bug_answer_req=true? Is there some trick to using it? My recordings are happening fine, except that the ringtone is included at the start. This is the relevant parts of the dialplan - I've stripped out a bunch of other things, and just included the things that could be relevant. <action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=false"/> <action application="set" data="continue_on_fail=true"/> <action application="set" data="call_timeout=20"/> <action application="set" data="storageName=${dialed_extension}_${strftime(%Y%m%d_%H%M)}"/> <action application="set" data="storagePath=/opt/files/${strftime(%Y%m)}"/> <action application="set" data="call_timeout=20"/> <action application="export" data="nolocal:execute_on_answer=javascript BridgeConnected.js"/> <action application="javascript" data="BridgeBefore.js"/> <action application="set" data="*media_bug_answer_req*=true"/> <action application="record_session" data="${storagePath}/${storageName}.wav"/> <action application="bridge" data="user/${dialed_extension}@ ${domain_name}"/> I'm on v1.0.5 (rev16966) so I shouldn't be using the old variable (RECORD_ANSWER_REQ ) Cheers, Fraser

3 6

Set the outgoing caller id
by Erkan Ünlü 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

Hi all, I worked since 2 years with asterisk. But now I must use the Windows Platform. So I found Freeswitch. The first works with Freeswitch are very good, but I can't set the outgoing caller id. The outgoing caller id is shown at the phone on the end of the line. I try some different variables but without result. My voip provider support to set the callerid, in asterisk it works. .... <include> <context name="default"> <extension name="voicetrading.com"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^00(\d+)$"> <action application="set" data="effective_caller_id_name=009012345678"/> <action application="set" data="effective_caller_id_number=009012345678"/> <action application="set" data="outbound_caller_id_name=009012345678"/> <action application="set" data="outbound_caller_id_number=009012345678"/> <action application="bridge" data="sofia/gateway/voicetrading.com/00000$1"/> </condition> </extension> .... Can anyone give me a idea for what can I do. Kind regards Erkan Unlu

5 11

issue with placing calls between users (uses server ip instead of domain)
by Gerard Braad 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

I am testing the following with Freeswitch and different devices (nokia n900, nokia e60, ekiga) and have similar results between them. On the Freeswitch server (1.0.4 in multi-tenant mode) I have several user profiles for a domain, e.g. 1000, 1001 for host.com The user are authenticated correctly and calls can be placede. When I place a call from a device registered as 1001(a)host.com to 1002(a)host.com it will show up at the other end (1002) as 1001(a)12.34.56.78 I would expect this call to show up as 1001(a)host.com. The IP address is the one of from the Freeswitch server. Because of this, the calls are no correctly recognized by the address book on certain devices. Can the he domain FQDN of the callers domain/acount be used, instead of the IP address of the server in the SIP uri? kind regards, Gerard

2 1

Experience with FreeSWITCH & Turnserver.org ?
by RobertT 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

Currently I made this kind of setup. Everything, including pjsip based client implementation, is as you described. I use FS in bypass_media mode in order to be able to utilize all NAT traversing capabilities possible while using pjsip with reTurnServer. So far so good for me. But still, I have very limited traffic for now. Best regards, RobertT.

3 3