October 2019 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

avmd stops when bgapi uuid_broadcast starts
by ivan381eu 31 Oct '19

31 Oct '19

What I need is to start intro sound file playback on call answer and detect beep sound from callee side What I tried is: 1. start avmd 2. bridge call 3. on answer start intro sound message playback using bgapi BUT when background playback starts avmd seems to be paused and continues after playback is completed. gateway dialplan is: <extension name="mytelco"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^987(\d+)$"> <action application="set" data="effective_caller_id_number=46xxxxxxxx"/> <action application="set" data="record_link=${strftime(%Y-%m-%d-%H-%M-%S)}_${destination_number}_${caller_id_number}.wav"/> <action application="record_session" data="/var/www/html/freeswitch/recordings/${record_link}"/> <action application="lua" data="/etc/freeswitch/scripts/beep_detection-from-call-v0.1.2.lua $1 ${record_link}"/> <action application="hangup"/> </condition> </extension> file beep_detection-from-call-v0.1.2.lua #!/usr/local/bin/lua DNID = argv[1] if session:ready() then session:sleep(1000) session:execute("avmd_start", "inbound_channel=1,outbound_channel=0,sample_n_continuous_streak=10,sample_n_to_skip=0,debug=1,report_status=1") session:execute("bridge", "{execute_on_answer=lua /etc/freeswitch/scripts/on_answer-v0.3.lua " .. uuid .. "}sofia/gateway/mytelco/" .. DNID) session:execute("avmd_stop","") end --if file on_answer-v0.3.lua #!/usr/bin/lua uuid_original = argv[1] api = freeswitch.API() reply = api:executeString("bgapi uuid_broadcast " .. uuid_original .. " /usr/share/asterisk/sounds/en/dennis-ivan.gsm both") freeswitch.consoleLog("INFO","==============================================") freeswitch.consoleLog("INFO","API reply is:" .. reply) freeswitch.consoleLog("INFO","==============================================") -- Sent from: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/

2 1

tcp-keepalive stuck at 30 seconds
by Nathan Stratton 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

<param name="socket-tcp-keepalive" value="true"/> <param name="tcp-keepalive" value="10000"/> Even tho, tcp-keepalive is set to 10 seconds (10000 ms), wireshark shows WSS TCP Keep-Alive every 30 seconds. ><> nathan stratton

1 0

VM not deleted with vm-keep-local-after-email=false
by Sean Devoy 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

I have this config in the directory: <param name="vm-mailto" value="sdevoy(a)bizfocused.com"/> <param name="vm-keep-local-after-email" value="false"/> <param name="vm-email-all-messages" value="true"/> <param name="vm-attach-file" value="true" /> It is working great now except the VM is not deleted regardless of vm-keep-local-after-email. Any ideas? Sean

1 0

mod_voicemail send email --- lost
by Sean Devoy 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

Hi, I recently upgraded to v 1.10 on Debian 10. My log shows emails being mailed just fine. However, I cannot find them on the recipient end. I have searched all folders and spam. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I tested with this first: sendmail -vt < ./mailtest.txt mailtest.txt is: To: sdevoy(a)bizfocused.com Subject: FreeSwitch sendmail test two From: freeswitch(a)bizfocused.com And here goes the e-mail body, test test test.. That works fine. But FreeSwitch emails do not. Switch.config.xml has: <param name="mailer-app" value="/usr/sbin/sendmail"/> <param name="mailer-app-args" value="-t"/> <param name="dump-cores" value="yes"/> The extension params for this extension are: <param name="vm-mailto" value="sdevoy(a)bizfocused.com"/> <param name="vm-mailfrom" value="voicemail(a)bizfocused.com"/> <param name="vm-email-all-messages" value="true"/> <param name="vm-attach-file" value="true" /> The FS log says: 2019-10-29 20:41:28.276313 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:2832 Deliver VM to 220@voicemail_BFIS 2019-10-29 20:41:28.276313 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1925 Update MWI: Processing for 220@voicemail_BFIS in inbox 2019-10-29 20:41:28.276313 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1950 Update MWI: Messages Waiting yes 2019-10-29 20:41:28.276313 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1951 Update MWI: Update Reason NEW 2019-10-29 20:41:28.276313 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1952 Update MWI: Message Account 220@voicemail_BFIS 2019-10-29 20:41:28.276313 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1953 Update MWI: Voice Message 1/0 2019-10-29 20:41:28.876348 [DEBUG] switch_utils.c:1298 Emailed file [/tmp/mail.157238168887fe] to [sdevoy(a)bizfocused.com] 2019-10-29 20:41:28.876348 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:3042 Sending message to sdevoy(a)bizfocused.com 0735ca19-76d1-460e-9571-ef499f962cd1 2019-10-29 20:41:28.876348 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:2905 sofia/internal/14108084699(a)64.136.173.31 skip receive message [APPLICATION_EXEC_COMPLETE] (channel is hungup already) 0735ca19-76d1-460e-9571-ef499f962cd1 2019-10-29 20:41:28.876348 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:651 (sofia/internal/14108084699(a)64.136.173.31) State EXECUTE going to sleep 0735ca19-76d1-460e-9571-ef499f962cd1 2019-10-29 20:41:28.876348 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:585 (sofia/internal/14108084699(a)64.136.173.31) Running State Change CS_HANGUP (Cur 2 Tot 327) 0735ca19-76d1-460e-9571-ef499f962cd1 2019-10-29 20:41:28.876348 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:848 (sofia/internal/14108084699(a)64.136.173.31) Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HANGUP 0735ca19-76d1-460e-9571-ef499f962cd1 2019-10-29 20:41:28.876348 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:850 (sofia/internal/14108084699(a)64.136.173.31) State HANGUP Mail.log for this time period: Oct 29 20:46:46 fs-bfis2 sendmail[15253]: x9TKkkOP015253: from=root, size=153, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<201910292046.x9TKkkOP015253(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com>, relay=root@localhost Oct 29 20:46:46 fs-bfis2 sm-mta[15261]: x9TKkkDb015261: from=<root(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com>, size=389, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<201910292046.x9TKkkOP015253(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA-v4, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Oct 29 20:46:46 fs-bfis2 sm-mta[15261]: STARTTLS=client, relay=bizfocused-com.mail.protection.outlook.com., version=TLSv1.2, verify=FAIL, cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384, bits=256/256 Oct 29 20:46:48 fs-bfis2 sm-mta[15261]: x9TKkkDb015261: to=<sdevoy(a)bizfocused.com>, ctladdr=<root(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com> (0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=30389, relay=bizfocused-com.mai...ction.outlook.com. [104.47.37.36], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (<201910292046.x9TKkkOP015253(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com> [InternalId=15448997367314, Hostname=BN6PR01MB2611.prod.exchangelabs.com] 8530 bytes in 0.197, 42.133 KB/sec Queued mail for delivery) Oct 29 20:46:48 fs-bfis2 sendmail[15253]: x9TKkkOP015253: to=sdevoy(a)bizfocused.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=relay, pri=30153, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (x9TKkkDb015261 Message accepted for delivery) Oct 29 20:47:31 fs-bfis2 sendmail[15317]: x9TKlVic015317: from=root, size=153, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<201910292047.x9TKlVic015317(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com>, relay=root@localhost Oct 29 20:47:31 fs-bfis2 sm-mta[15320]: x9TKlVxv015320: from=<root(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com>, size=389, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<201910292047.x9TKlVic015317(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA-v4, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Oct 29 20:47:31 fs-bfis2 sm-mta[15320]: STARTTLS=client, relay=bizfocused-com.mail.protection.outlook.com., version=TLSv1.2, verify=FAIL, cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384, bits=256/256 Oct 29 20:47:32 fs-bfis2 sm-mta[15320]: x9TKlVxv015320: to=<sdevoy(a)bizfocused.com>, ctladdr=<root(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com> (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30389, relay=bizfocused-com.mai...ction.outlook.com. [104.47.38.36], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (<201910292047.x9TKlVic015317(a)fs-bfis2.bizfocused.com> [InternalId=14349485741504, Hostname=MWHPR01MB2414.prod.exchangelabs.com] 8583 bytes in 0.193, 43.379 KB/sec Queued mail for delivery) Oct 29 20:47:32 fs-bfis2 sendmail[15317]: x9TKlVic015317: to=sdevoy(a)bizfocused.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=relay, pri=30153, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (x9TKlVxv015320 Message accepted for delivery) Oct 29 20:48:08 fs-bfis2 sendmail[15323]: gethostbyaddr(165.227.222.107) failed: 1 Oct 29 20:48:08 fs-bfis2 sendmail[15323]: gethostbyaddr(10.17.0.8) failed: 1 Mail.warn: Oct 29 20:48:08 fs-bfis2 sendmail[15323]: gethostbyaddr(165.227.222.107) failed: 1 Oct 29 20:48:08 fs-bfis2 sendmail[15323]: gethostbyaddr(10.17.0.8) failed: 1 Any ideas? Thanks, Sean

3 5

Re: [Freeswitch-users] replace SIP from user and host part
by David Villasmil 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

If you need to set a sip-from to be the same always, you can set that in the gateway configuration: <param name="from-user" value="cluecon"/> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 15:56, Tamer Higazi via FreeSWITCH-users < freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Tamer Higazi <th982a(a)googlemail.com> > To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 23:36:54 +0100 > Subject: replace SIP from user and host part > Hi people, > > My ISP provider is very special and forces me to reset the user and host > part of my external profile. > > At the current stage, FS sets the endpoint user ID as sip-from user, and > the external ip-address as the sip-from host and the ISP gateway returns > me a 404 not found. > > When I turn off the PBX and register to the gateway directly with a > softphone, the softphone can place a call. > sip-from user is the userID of the gateway login and host the proxy > address of the gateway. > > How can I set a new sip-from-user and host prior bridging a call to the > gateway? > > I found 2 channel variables. > > variable_sip_from_user - sip_from_user > variable_sip_from_host - sip_from_host > > Is that the solution manipulating these variables? > Am I capable manipulate those ? > Would that be the solution ? > > I am a little bit new to FS. > For a dialplan example I welcome thankfully any advise. > > > wireshark dump: > > JITSI Softphone Call: > Session Initiation Protocol (100) > Status-Line: SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us > Status-Code: 100 > [Resent Packet: False] > [Request Frame: 2481] > [Response Time (ms): 13] > Message Header > Call-ID: bb85334b160ce6cb26ab480fd2a13236@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 > [Generated Call-ID: > bb85334b160ce6cb26ab480fd2a13236@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0] > CSeq: 2 INVITE > Sequence Number: 2 > Method: INVITE > From: "117xxxxxx" <sip:117xxxxxx@sip12.e-fon.ch>;tag=51a3e1d6 > SIP Display info: "117xxxxxx" > SIP from address: sip:117xxxxxx@sip12.e-fon.ch > SIP from address User Part: 117xxxxxx > SIP from address Host Part: sip12.e-fon.ch > SIP from tag: 51a3e1d6 > To: <sip:0764823425@sip12.e-fon.ch> > SIP to address: sip:076xxxxxxx@sip12.e-fon.ch > SIP to address User Part: 076xxxxxxx > SIP to address Host Part: sip12.e-fon.ch > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > > 217.162.xxx.xxx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-383638-321b4bfd0c24f1f48906ff6382c3b18b;rport=5060 > Transport: UDP > Sent-by Address: 217.162.xxx.xxx > Sent-by port: 5060 > Branch: z9hG4bK-383638-321b4bfd0c24f1f48906ff6382c3b18b > RPort: 5060 > Content-Length: 0 > > > (successfull placing the call) > > > FS Call: > Session Initiation Protocol (404) > Status-Line: SIP/2.0 404 Not found > Status-Code: 404 > [Resent Packet: False] > [Request Frame: 12659] > [Response Time (ms): 13] > Message Header > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > > 217.162.xxx.xxx:5080;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKmNHFUDQav3tUj;received=217.162.xxx.xxx > Transport: UDP > Sent-by Address: 217.162.xxx.xxx > Sent-by port: 5080 > RPort: 5080 > Branch: z9hG4bKmNHFUDQav3tUj > Received: 217.162.xxx.xxx > From: "1000" <sip:1000@217.162.xxx.xxx>;tag=gNe9eHQm44HBj > SIP Display info: "1000" > SIP from address: sip:1000@217.162.xxx.xxx > SIP from address User Part: 1000 > SIP from address Host Part: 217.162.xxx.xxx > SIP from tag: gNe9eHQm44HBj > To: > <sip:076xxxxxxx@sip12.e-fon.ch>;tag=56dedfd3319cd1b9fedc1197b499329c.26ea > SIP to address: sip:076xxxxxxx@sip12.e-fon.ch > SIP to address User Part: 076xxxxxxx > SIP to address Host Part: sip12.e-fon.ch > SIP to tag: 56dedfd3319cd1b9fedc1197b499329c.26ea > Call-ID: 84f02fe4-71ef-1238-b881-00012e808c2d > [Generated Call-ID: 84f02fe4-71ef-1238-b881-00012e808c2d] > CSeq: 11458424 INVITE > Sequence Number: 11458424 > Method: INVITE > Content-Length: 0 > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Tamer Higazi via FreeSWITCH-users < > freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:56:21 -0700 (PDT) > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] replace SIP from user and host part > _________________________________________________________________________ > > The FreeSWITCH project is sponsored by SignalWire https://signalwire.com > Enhance your FreeSWITCH install with disruptive priced SMS and PSTN > services. > Build your next product on our scalable cloud platform. > > Join our online community to chat in real time > https://signalwire.community > > Professional FreeSWITCH Services > sales(a)freeswitch.com > https://freeswitch.com > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > https://freeswitch.com/oss > https://freeswitch.org/confluence > https://cluecon.com > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > https://freeswitch.com -- Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

2 1

Use the From instead of P-Asserted-Identity
by igor.potjevlesch＠gmail.com 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

Hello, I have a call scenario with From + P-Asserted-Identity. I would like to give precedence on From. I configured the caller-id-in-from to True for this gateway and force on leg B sip_cid_type to none in the dialplan. I have tried some others combinations, but each time the PAI is inserted into the From header on the leg B. Any idea of the right way to do this? Regards, Igor.

3 5

CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE events received not keeping pace with number of calls
by Neil Patel 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

Hi All, I have an event listener script (Python) that listens for “CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE” events. Logs show that the script, which runs continuously in an infinite loop within supervisor, receives 1000 events every 15 mins. At the same time we are making about 15K calls every 15 mins. So this script is 15x slower than the volume of calls and falls behind and often gets the “Queue size: [100000/100000] Max queue size reached” error. My question is: how do I make the events reach the listener faster to keep up with the outbound call traffic? Thanks.

3 3

About FreeSWITCH HA
by 王聡 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

Hey all, I’m trying to build a FS cluster with HA, but I got some trouble on recovering calls. HA system is based on HA instruction(https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/High+Avail… <https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/High+Availability>), and my freeswitch dialplan is based on conference app. When I tried to recover a call on secondary server, a new coming call arised to callee and the old call turned into mute. The same setting works well based on bridge, which correctly failover to secondary server. The dialplan showed like: <extension name="apptest"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="apptest1002"> <action application="answer"/> <action application="set" data="conference_auto_outcall_prefix={execute_on_answer=lua welcome.lua 1001-1002 hasid apptest}"/> <action application="conference_set_auto_outcall" data=“user/9991002"/> <action application="conference" data="1001-1002@default”/> </condition> </extension> I wonder if this problem occurred by conference or mistaken configure. Any idea would be appreciated. Regards, C.Wang

2 1

Voicemail to email with user XML from Lua
by Paul Smith 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

Hi, I'm new to freeswitch but have been playing with configs and reading confluence and the Packt book for a few weeks. Is there a difference between setting up a user as static XML and getting the user XML snippet from a lua script? I can't seem to get voicemail to email to work if the user XML snippet is generated by lua, but it works fine if I have the static xml in a file. The following fs_cli command to post the email works fine. So the mail server, templates etc are OK. vm_fsdb_msg_email default 123 1039 f8df8b69-21d7-4339-836e-777dbec87db3 customer1@mytestdomain I suspect that loading the XML at startup as opposed to generating snippet from lua is significant? This static user directory/123/1039.xml works: <include> <user id="1039"> <params> <param name="password" value="$${default_password}"/> <param name="vm-password" value="1000"/> <param name="vm-mailto" value="testing(a)mydomain-ni.com" /> <param name="vm-mailfrom" value="paul(a)mydomain-ni.com" /> <param name="vm-email-all-messages" value="true" /> </params> <variables> <variable name="toll_allow" value="domestic,international,local"/> <variable name="accountcode" value="1000"/> <variable name="user_context" value="default"/> <variable name="effective_caller_id_name" value="Extension 1000"/> <variable name="effective_caller_id_number" value="1039"/> <variable name="outbound_caller_id_name" value="$${outbound_caller_name}"/> <variable name="outbound_caller_id_number" value="$${outbound_caller_id}"/> <variable name="callgroup" value="techsupport"/> </variables> </user> </include> Email is sent and log shows: *2019-10-24 09:38:21.955085 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1952 Update MWI: Message Account 1039@123 2019-10-24 09:38:21.955085 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1953 Update MWI: Voice Message 28/1 2019-10-24 09:38:22.875122 [DEBUG] switch_utils.c:1300 Emailed data to [testing(a)mydomain-ni.com] 2019-10-24 09:38:22.875122 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:3042 Sending message to testing(a)mydomain-ni.com e5e12f00-e39b-4eda-8e27-a22adc14ddb3 2019-10-24 09:38:22.875122 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:70 No language specified - Using [en] * But generating a very similar XML from LUA... the voicemail is saved, and MWI activated. But no email is sent. 2019-10-24 10:03:18.271420 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1925 Update MWI: Processing for 1039@123 in inbox 2019-10-24 10:03:18.271420 [NOTICE] switch_cpp.cpp:1443 Debug directory xml snippet: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <document type="freeswitch/xml"> <section name="directory"> <domain name="123"> <user id="1039"> <params> <param name="password" value="sjkdfsjhdf4895sdkjh8934tsdvsjdkgsf"/> <param name="vm-password" value="0000"/> <param name="vm-mailto" value="checkto(a)mydomain-ni.com"/> <param name="vm-mailfrom" value="voicemail(a)vociemail.co.uk"/> <param name="vm-email-all-messages value="true"/>   </params> <variables> <variable name="toll_allow" value="domestic,international,local"/> <variable name="user_context" value="default"/> <variable name="accountcode" value="1000"/> <variable name="user_context" value="default"/> <variable name="effective_caller_id_name" value="Extension 1000"/> <variable name="effective_caller_id_number" value="1039"/> <variable name="outbound_caller_id_name" value="Frank"/> <variable name="outbound_caller_id_number" value="10390"/> <variable name="callgroup" value="techsupport"/> </variables> </user> </domain> </section> </document> 2019-10-24 10:03:18.271420 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1950 Update MWI: Messages Waiting yes 2019-10-24 10:03:18.271420 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1951 Update MWI: Update Reason NEW 2019-10-24 10:03:18.271420 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1952 Update MWI: Message Account 1039@123 *2019-10-24 10:03:18.271420 [DEBUG] mod_voicemail.c:1953 Update MWI: Voice Message 29/1* *2019-10-24 10:03:18.271420 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:70 No language specified - Using [en]* 2019-10-24 10:03:18.291420 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:250 Handle play-file:[voicemail/vm-goodbye.wav] (en:en) 2019-10-24 10:03:18.291420 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:1492 Codec Activated L16@8000hz 1 channels 20ms

2 2

BLF missing NOTIFY Error?
by Sean Devoy 29 Oct '19

29 Oct '19

Hi, I have been working with the engineers at Fanvil (China) on a problem. Their English is just slightly better than my Mandarin. Their diagnosis is that this is a FreeSwitch error (of course). Here is the scenario: Ext 220 (Fanvil) has a BLF button/lamp for ext 225 (any sip phone). Things work as expected for incoming call to 225 (blink), 225 on call (solid), 225 hang up (off). The single item that fails is when 225 calls 220. When the call end 220's BLA for 225 stays on solid. Note that the other direction works fine (220 to 225). Fanvil says there should be a notify after the hangup when 225 calls 220 (monitoring 225). I have verified with wireshark that the is not one. I don't know if there should be. Would someone more knowledgeable than I care to weigh in? Do I need to learn how to do an actual JIRA? WireShark files attached. Let me know if there is another way to share them. "worked.dmp" is 220=>225 "error" is 225=>220 Thanks, Sean

2 3