May 2011 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

TLS error?
by Federico Beffa 27 Dec '13

27 Dec '13

Hi, I'm trying to setup FS as a gtalk client. I'm working on Linux Ubuntu 10.04 and have cloned the git FS repository about 1 week ago. I can compile everything with no errors. However, after configuring client.xml and starting FS I see the following error message in the freeswitch.log file: 2010-07-20 23:38:56.392853 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:926 Error Loading module /opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_ dingaling.so **/opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_dingaling.so: undefined symbol: gnutls_global_init** TLS comes from the following Ubuntu packages: libgnutls26, libgnutls-dev. I would appreciate any suggestion on how to investigate further the problem. Could it be a gnutls library version incompatibility? A bug in FS? In the ubuntu gnutls packages? Or simply an error in the configuration? Thanks for you help! Fede

4 4

TLS Audiocodes
by Szasz Szabolcs 26 Dec '13

26 Dec '13

Hi, Did anybody set up TLS between Freeswitch and Audiodes MP11X ? I got to work TLS between freeswitch and a softphone (phonerlite), but I have problem with Audiocodes during the TLS authentication. I've loaded the certification but it still doesn't work. Can I debug the tls in freeswitch? Please help me. Thank you in advance. Szasz Szabolcs

3 3

Gateway Registration Issues
by Aloysius Lloyd 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

Hi All, I am trying to connect IRISTEL ( CLEC ) in Canada and FreeSWITCH. I have the following gateway configuration <include> <gateway name="wwc_test"> <param name="auth-username" value="username"/> <param name="username" value="14161231234" /> <param name="password" value="password" /> <param name="proxy" value="sbc1.iristel.net" /> <param name="realm" value="iristel.net" /> <param name="expire-seconds" value="120"/> <param name="register" value="true"/> <param name="retry-seconds" value="30"/> <param name="ping" value="25"/> </gateway> </include> The above configuration is not working. I have the following error in cli Error. *2010-05-13 08:34:15.987465 [ERR] sofia_reg.c:1501 14161231234 Registration Failed with status Conflict [409]. failure #1* ==== Also carrier saying there is conflict in the contact field.Here is how they receive now. *Contact: <sip:gw+test_iristel@10.20.30.1:5080 ;transport=udp;gw=test_iristel>.* But the contact field should be like below Contact: <14161231234@10.20.30.1:5080; Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. Lloyd

5 6

Is it necessary to call hangup....
by Moiz Chinoy 07 Nov '13

07 Nov '13

Hello, Is it necessary to call hangup in dialplan after say playing a file through playback application. -- Regards, Moiz Chinoy.

5 4

Cordless phones
by Jonas Gauffin 19 Sep '13

19 Sep '13

Hi, I'm looking for IP-dects where a base station can handle 5 phones (which all should be able to talk at the same time). All suggestions are welcome. Regards, Jonas

10 13

Faxing problems if B leg offers T.38
by Rob Morin 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

Im having problems faxing if the B leg offers T.38. Several scenarios, but always the same result. First, the architecture FAX à ATA (T.38 optional) à FS à Carrier à Destination (Possibly another carrier (PSTN) and the fax machine) On my ATA, T.38 is enabled (Auto Detect). If the destination supports T.38, the Carrier will offer it to Freeswitch. If the Destination doesnt support T.38, the B leg doesnt offer it and the faxes go through. Ive set Freeswitch as: <action application="set" data="fax_enable_t38=true"/> <action application="export" data="t38_passthru=true"/> When thats the case, and the B leg offers T.38, Freeswitch passes through the offer and the ATA responds, 3 times. But the response never gets sent to the B leg, so it terminates the call after about 30 seconds. When I set Freeswitch as: <action application="set" data="fax_enable_t38=false"/> The B leg still offers T.38 if its other side is capable. Freeswitch doesnt pass the offer through and the B leg terminates the call after about 30 seconds. Im running on a recent git ( FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-86d757d 2011-05-17 22-51-47 -0500) ). Ive had no success attempting to configure FS as a gateway. Frankly, T.38 passthrough has had the most success, mostly when the other ends arent T.38 capable and it stays in G711u. Is there something else I need to do to enable T.38 in passthrough mode? Thank you, Rob Morin PS I can provide tcpdumps of this, or whatever else is necessary.

5 13

Anyone able to get freeswitch to register a gateway over TLS or TCP? I can't get it to not send UDP packets for reg.
by Mitch Capper 14 Jun '13

14 Jun '13

I am trying to get freeswitch to register with another freeswitch server (on TLS port 5061) however default the config settings I believe should set it, it always trys to register over UDP (after registration or with registration set to false however it does send TCP then for outbound calls). If anyone has a gateway config that actually registers over TCP or TLS that would be great. The client gateway/profile config at: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/15383is what i believe should work but isn't I have tried setting contact-params on the gateway to tport=tls tport=tcp tport=tcp;transport=tls and transport=tls without any luck. Anyway even TCP would be helpful as it would allow me to trace better how the sip registration decides to use TCP or UDP. I tried digging into libsofia but its a bit hard to trace and understand with its generic event structure and tagging (plus the documentation isn't the most rebust on registration options). Thanks ~Mitch

3 4

Newbie's installation: Can't start FS at boot
by Dyna Guy 23 May '13

23 May '13

I am a newbie to FS and I want learn it. So I setup a Centos 5.2 (fresh install) and followed the instruction on the wiki installed the new Freeswitch v1.0.3. After the installation I can start FS by issus command "/usr/local/freeswitch/bin/freeswitch". After that I copied freeswitch.init.centos5 to /etc/init.d/freeswitch and chmod it to 755. Reboot the server and FS is not running. If I try the start up script: [root@localhost build]# /etc/init.d/freeswitch start Starting freeswitch: [ OK ] [root@localhost build]# /etc/init.d/freeswitch status freeswitch dead but subsys locked Did I miss somthing here? Please help. Thanks a lot. dynaguy Here is the copy of the origenal freeswitch.init.centos5 ---------------------------- [root@localhost ~]# cat /etc/init.d/freeswitch #!/bin/bash # # /etc/rc.d/init.d/freeswitch # # The FreeSwitch Open Source Voice Platform # # chkconfig: 345 89 14 # description: Starts and stops the freeswitch server daemon # processname: freeswitch # config: /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/freeswitch.conf # pidfile: /usr/local/freeswitch/log/freeswitch.pid # # Source function library. . /etc/init.d/functions PROG_NAME=freeswitch PID_FILE=${PID_FILE-/usr/local/freeswitch/log/freeswitch.pid} FS_USER=${FS_USER-freeswitch} FS_FILE=${FS_FILE-/usr/local/freeswitch/bin/freeswitch} FS_HOME=${FS_HOME-/usr/local/freeswitch} LOCK_FILE=/var/lock/subsys/freeswitch FREESWITCH_ARGS="-nc" RETVAL=0 # Source options file if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/freeswitch ]; then . /etc/sysconfig/freeswitch fi # <define any local shell functions used by the code that follows> start() { echo -n "Starting $PROG_NAME: " if [ -e $LOCK_FILE ]; then if [ -e $PID_FILE ] && [ -e /proc/`cat $PID_FILE` ]; then echo echo -n $"$PROG_NAME is already running."; failure $"$PROG_NAME is already running."; echo return 1 fi fi cd $FS_HOME daemon --user $FS_USER --pidfile $PID_FILE "$FS_FILE $FREESWITCH_ARGS $FREESWITCH_PARAMS >/dev/null 2>&1" echo RETVAL=$? [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ] && touch $LOCK_FILE; echo return $RETVAL } stop() { echo -n "Shutting down $PROG_NAME: " if [ ! -e $LOCK_FILE ]; then echo echo -n $"cannot stop $PROG_NAME: $PROG_NAME is not running." failure $"cannot stop $PROG_NAME: $PROG_NAME is not running." echo return 1; fi cd $FS_HOME $FS_FILE -stop > /dev/null 2>&1 killproc $PROG_NAME RETVAL=$? echo [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ] && rm -f $LOCK_FILE; return $RETVAL } rhstatus() { status $PROG_NAME; } case "$1" in start) start ;; stop) stop ;; status) status $PROG_NAME RETVAL=$? ;; restart) stop start ;; reload) # <cause the service configuration to be reread, either with # kill -HUP or by restarting the daemons, in a manner similar # to restart above> ;; condrestart) [ -f $PID_FILE ] && restart || : ;; *) echo "Usage: $PROG_NAME {start|stop|status|reload|restart}" exit 1 ;; esac exit $RETVAL

3 2

ooH323 vs mod_h323
by Saeed Ahmed 17 Feb '13

17 Feb '13

Dear FSers, which one is better to use when there are higher number of concurrent calls? *ooH323 *or *mod_h323*. Thanks

9 22

Sofia fails to detect offline gateway
by Steven Ayre 03 Jan '13

03 Jan '13

Hi Guys, A couple of our gateways have been shut down for hardware upgrades. However, the FreeSWITCH servers didn't spot the gateways go offline so they're still trying to send calls to them. I see this in the logs: 2011-01-11 09:35:05.396610 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw4 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:05.396610 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw3 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:13.408674 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw4 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:13.408674 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw3 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:21.420884 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw4 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:21.420884 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw3 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:29.458114 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw4 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:29.458114 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw3 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:37.472424 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw4 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:37.472424 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw3 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:46.475934 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw4 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:46.475934 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw3 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:55.489967 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw4 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP 2011-01-11 09:35:55.489967 [WARNING] sofia.c:3981 Ping failed gw3 with code 503 - count 1/0/10, state UP ... you get the idea. I've done some testing and it happens both when FS is running and the gateway goes offline (code 408 then) and when FS starts up with the gateway already offline (code 503 as above). Both IP addresses are entirely offline. I had expected these would go to state DOWN but they haven't, I just get the above repeating. The gateway definitions look like this: <gateway name="gw3"> <param name="realm" value="a.b.c.d"/> <param name="username" value="nouser"/> <param name="password" value="nopass"/> <param name="register" value="false"/> <param name="caller-id-in-from" value="true"/> <param name="ping" value="5"/> <param name="ping-max" value="10"/> <param name="ping-min" value="1"/> <param name="retry-seconds" value="5"/> <param name="expire-seconds" value="60"/> </gateway> Is there a mistake in my configuration? -Steve

6 11