Dear FSers, which one is better to use when there are higher number of concurrent calls? *ooH323 *or *mod_h323*. Thanks
i think he meant opal On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
We don't have an ooh323 driver in FreeSWITCH.
/b
On Jul 2, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Saeed Ahmed wrote:
Dear FSers,
which one is better to use when there are higher number of concurrent calls? ooH323 or mod_h323.
Thanks
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
DOH... btw ooh323 is now license compatible with FreeSWITCH if anyone wants to write one. /b On Jul 2, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:
i think he meant opal
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote: We don't have an ooh323 driver in FreeSWITCH.
/b
It has a FLOSS exception in the GPL license. /b On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 07/03/2010 04:28 AM, Brian West wrote:
DOH... btw ooh323 is now license compatible with FreeSWITCH if anyone wants to write one.
/b
Where did you see that? The current ooh323c tarball still says GPL 2.
Steve
I was just looking at this library to play with the idea of writing a mod_ooh323c. It looks like the library may have forked away from the version used in Asterisk though? The latest version on the website ( http://www.obj-sys.com/telephony-objective.shtml) is 0.9.4, but cannot hangup with a Q.931 hangup cause. The CVS repository ( sourceforge.net/projects/ooh323c) doesn't seem up-to-date since that's only holding 0.9.0. The version in asterisk has been patched to add a q931cause parameter to ooHangCall so it can - but it seems to be based off 'v0.8.3m' and I don't know if that's before the FLOSS exception was added. So does anyone more familiar with the library know whether the repository had been moved elsewhere, or whether there's a more recent version somewhere else, and whether the one bundled in Asterisk would be usable? -Steve On 5 July 2010 15:28, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
It has a FLOSS exception in the GPL license.
/b
On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 07/03/2010 04:28 AM, Brian West wrote:
DOH... btw ooh323 is now license compatible with FreeSWITCH if anyone wants to write one.
/b
Where did you see that? The current ooh323c tarball still says GPL 2.
Steve
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Indeed comparing the COPYING files, the Asterisk one lacks the FLOSS exception. So that version isn't usable, and neither is copying their patches into the 0.9.4 version since they'd be GPL-only. So while 0.9.4 would be usable, it'd lack some useful functionality (Q.931 causes are just the one I spotted from a 5 minute glance through the API). -Steve On 13 February 2013 12:27, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
I was just looking at this library to play with the idea of writing a mod_ooh323c. It looks like the library may have forked away from the version used in Asterisk though?
The latest version on the website ( http://www.obj-sys.com/telephony-objective.shtml) is 0.9.4, but cannot hangup with a Q.931 hangup cause. The CVS repository ( sourceforge.net/projects/ooh323c) doesn't seem up-to-date since that's only holding 0.9.0.
The version in asterisk has been patched to add a q931cause parameter to ooHangCall so it can - but it seems to be based off 'v0.8.3m' and I don't know if that's before the FLOSS exception was added.
So does anyone more familiar with the library know whether the repository had been moved elsewhere, or whether there's a more recent version somewhere else, and whether the one bundled in Asterisk would be usable?
-Steve
On 5 July 2010 15:28, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
It has a FLOSS exception in the GPL license.
/b
On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 07/03/2010 04:28 AM, Brian West wrote:
DOH... btw ooh323 is now license compatible with FreeSWITCH if anyone wants to write one.
/b
Where did you see that? The current ooh323c tarball still says GPL 2.
Steve
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
How intense are their patches? The reason I ask is that while a blind C&P of their patches into the recent version would most likely result in a GPL violation, looking at what the code does and mimicking the functionality with new code most certainly would not result in a violation. (GPL covers "derivation" but not "inspiration" as it were. It's the whole copyright "idea" vs. "expression" dichotomy...) Anyway, I was just curious what's involved. Possibly other interested parties would be in a position to help out. -MC On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Indeed comparing the COPYING files, the Asterisk one lacks the FLOSS exception. So that version isn't usable, and neither is copying their patches into the 0.9.4 version since they'd be GPL-only.
So while 0.9.4 would be usable, it'd lack some useful functionality (Q.931 causes are just the one I spotted from a 5 minute glance through the API).
-Steve
On 13 February 2013 12:27, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
I was just looking at this library to play with the idea of writing a mod_ooh323c. It looks like the library may have forked away from the version used in Asterisk though?
The latest version on the website ( http://www.obj-sys.com/telephony-objective.shtml) is 0.9.4, but cannot hangup with a Q.931 hangup cause. The CVS repository ( sourceforge.net/projects/ooh323c) doesn't seem up-to-date since that's only holding 0.9.0.
The version in asterisk has been patched to add a q931cause parameter to ooHangCall so it can - but it seems to be based off 'v0.8.3m' and I don't know if that's before the FLOSS exception was added.
So does anyone more familiar with the library know whether the repository had been moved elsewhere, or whether there's a more recent version somewhere else, and whether the one bundled in Asterisk would be usable?
-Steve
On 5 July 2010 15:28, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
It has a FLOSS exception in the GPL license.
/b
On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 07/03/2010 04:28 AM, Brian West wrote:
DOH... btw ooh323 is now license compatible with FreeSWITCH if anyone wants to write one.
/b
Where did you see that? The current ooh323c tarball still says GPL 2.
Steve
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Michael S Collins Twitter: @mercutioviz http://www.FreeSWITCH.org http://www.ClueCon.com http://www.OSTAG.org
The q931cause parameter gets added in this revision: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=revision&revision=227898 Which as you can see is rather a large commit - they fix a lot of other issues too. q931cause alone means changing quite a lot of code though - 11 times in 6 different files, plus the modified functions that it appears within. It means changing ooHangCall, the parameters for the command on the stack, ooH323HangCall, storing q931cause on the call, and then setting it during the actual hangup. -Steve On 14 February 2013 00:32, Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:
How intense are their patches? The reason I ask is that while a blind C&P of their patches into the recent version would most likely result in a GPL violation, looking at what the code does and mimicking the functionality with new code most certainly would not result in a violation. (GPL covers "derivation" but not "inspiration" as it were. It's the whole copyright "idea" vs. "expression" dichotomy...)
Anyway, I was just curious what's involved. Possibly other interested parties would be in a position to help out.
-MC
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Indeed comparing the COPYING files, the Asterisk one lacks the FLOSS exception. So that version isn't usable, and neither is copying their patches into the 0.9.4 version since they'd be GPL-only.
So while 0.9.4 would be usable, it'd lack some useful functionality (Q.931 causes are just the one I spotted from a 5 minute glance through the API).
-Steve
On 13 February 2013 12:27, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
I was just looking at this library to play with the idea of writing a mod_ooh323c. It looks like the library may have forked away from the version used in Asterisk though?
The latest version on the website ( http://www.obj-sys.com/telephony-objective.shtml) is 0.9.4, but cannot hangup with a Q.931 hangup cause. The CVS repository ( sourceforge.net/projects/ooh323c) doesn't seem up-to-date since that's only holding 0.9.0.
The version in asterisk has been patched to add a q931cause parameter to ooHangCall so it can - but it seems to be based off 'v0.8.3m' and I don't know if that's before the FLOSS exception was added.
So does anyone more familiar with the library know whether the repository had been moved elsewhere, or whether there's a more recent version somewhere else, and whether the one bundled in Asterisk would be usable?
-Steve
On 5 July 2010 15:28, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
It has a FLOSS exception in the GPL license.
/b
On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 07/03/2010 04:28 AM, Brian West wrote:
DOH... btw ooh323 is now license compatible with FreeSWITCH if anyone wants to write one.
/b
Where did you see that? The current ooh323c tarball still says GPL 2.
Steve
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Michael S Collins Twitter: @mercutioviz http://www.FreeSWITCH.org http://www.ClueCon.com http://www.OSTAG.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Maybe you can get that patcher to pull the lib with the newer license and contribute patches up stream :) -Avi On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
The q931cause parameter gets added in this revision: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=revision&revision=227898
Which as you can see is rather a large commit - they fix a lot of other issues too. q931cause alone means changing quite a lot of code though - 11 times in 6 different files, plus the modified functions that it appears within. It means changing ooHangCall, the parameters for the command on the stack, ooH323HangCall, storing q931cause on the call, and then setting it during the actual hangup.
-Steve
On 14 February 2013 00:32, Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:
How intense are their patches? The reason I ask is that while a blind C&P of their patches into the recent version would most likely result in a GPL violation, looking at what the code does and mimicking the functionality with new code most certainly would not result in a violation. (GPL covers "derivation" but not "inspiration" as it were. It's the whole copyright "idea" vs. "expression" dichotomy...)
Anyway, I was just curious what's involved. Possibly other interested parties would be in a position to help out.
-MC
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com>wrote:
Indeed comparing the COPYING files, the Asterisk one lacks the FLOSS exception. So that version isn't usable, and neither is copying their patches into the 0.9.4 version since they'd be GPL-only.
So while 0.9.4 would be usable, it'd lack some useful functionality (Q.931 causes are just the one I spotted from a 5 minute glance through the API).
-Steve
On 13 February 2013 12:27, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
I was just looking at this library to play with the idea of writing a mod_ooh323c. It looks like the library may have forked away from the version used in Asterisk though?
The latest version on the website ( http://www.obj-sys.com/telephony-objective.shtml) is 0.9.4, but cannot hangup with a Q.931 hangup cause. The CVS repository ( sourceforge.net/projects/ooh323c) doesn't seem up-to-date since that's only holding 0.9.0.
The version in asterisk has been patched to add a q931cause parameter to ooHangCall so it can - but it seems to be based off 'v0.8.3m' and I don't know if that's before the FLOSS exception was added.
So does anyone more familiar with the library know whether the repository had been moved elsewhere, or whether there's a more recent version somewhere else, and whether the one bundled in Asterisk would be usable?
-Steve
On 5 July 2010 15:28, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
It has a FLOSS exception in the GPL license.
/b
On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 07/03/2010 04:28 AM, Brian West wrote: > DOH... btw ooh323 is now license compatible with FreeSWITCH if anyone wants to write one. > > /b > Where did you see that? The current ooh323c tarball still says GPL 2.
Steve
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Michael S Collins Twitter: @mercutioviz http://www.FreeSWITCH.org http://www.ClueCon.com http://www.OSTAG.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
If someone wanted to build ooh323 module for FreeSWITCH we do have permission to do so using the lib. /b On Feb 14, 2013, at 2:08 AM, Steven Ayre wrote:
The q931cause parameter gets added in this revision: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=revision&revision=227898
Which as you can see is rather a large commit - they fix a lot of other issues too. q931cause alone means changing quite a lot of code though - 11 times in 6 different files, plus the modified functions that it appears within. It means changing ooHangCall, the parameters for the command on the stack, ooH323HangCall, storing q931cause on the call, and then setting it during the actual hangup.
-Steve
-- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire http://freeswitchcookbook.com http://freeswitchbook.com T: +1.213.286.0410 | F: +1.213.286.0401 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1286 0410
Hi Brian, The issue would be that Asterisk's modifications are on a version predating the FLOSS exemption and their project is GPL - so presumably their modifications are all GPL-only? -Steve On 15 February 2013 00:40, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
If someone wanted to build ooh323 module for FreeSWITCH we do have permission to do so using the lib.
/b
On Feb 14, 2013, at 2:08 AM, Steven Ayre wrote:
The q931cause parameter gets added in this revision: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=revision&revision=227898
Which as you can see is rather a large commit - they fix a lot of other issues too. q931cause alone means changing quite a lot of code though - 11 times in 6 different files, plus the modified functions that it appears within. It means changing ooHangCall, the parameters for the command on the stack, ooH323HangCall, storing q931cause on the call, and then setting it during the actual hangup.
-Steve
-- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531
Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire http://freeswitchcookbook.com http://freeswitchbook.com
T: +1.213.286.0410 | F: +1.213.286.0401 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1286 0410
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I'll see what I can do here. -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire T: +1.918.420.9266 | F: +1.918.420.9267 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9266 UK: +44 20 3298 4900 ISN: 410*543 On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:49 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brian,
The issue would be that Asterisk's modifications are on a version predating the FLOSS exemption and their project is GPL - so presumably their modifications are all GPL-only?
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 00:40, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote: If someone wanted to build ooh323 module for FreeSWITCH we do have permission to do so using the lib.
/b
So I have the impression you or someone has an ooh323 module and hasn't contributed it back to the project yet? -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire T: +1.918.420.9266 | F: +1.918.420.9267 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9266 UK: +44 20 3298 4900 ISN: 410*543 On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:49 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brian,
The issue would be that Asterisk's modifications are on a version predating the FLOSS exemption and their project is GPL - so presumably their modifications are all GPL-only?
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 00:40, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote: If someone wanted to build ooh323 module for FreeSWITCH we do have permission to do so using the lib.
/b
There's a module for Asterisk but none for FS I'm aware of yet - I'm only wondering about the feasibility of writing one. -Steve On 15 February 2013 14:48, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
So I have the impression you or someone has an ooh323 module and hasn't contributed it back to the project yet? -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire T: +1.918.420.9266 | F: +1.918.420.9267 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9266 UK: +44 20 3298 4900 ISN: 410*543
On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:49 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brian,
The issue would be that Asterisk's modifications are on a version predating the FLOSS exemption and their project is GPL - so presumably their modifications are all GPL-only?
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 00:40, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote: If someone wanted to build ooh323 module for FreeSWITCH we do have permission to do so using the lib.
/b
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
So we basically have 3 options, Opal, h323 and ooh323c, what's the difference among them? Also, I'm aware that video is not supported in the current mod_opal and mod_h323, is it possible(or how hard) to add video support? Or does ooh323c easy to support video? We'd like to contribute a little money to speed it up if it can support video and some want to work on it. -- Seven Du http://www.freeswitch.org.cn http://about.me/dujinfang http://www.dujinfang.com Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Friday, February 15, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Steven Ayre wrote:
There's a module for Asterisk but none for FS I'm aware of yet - I'm only wondering about the feasibility of writing one.
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 14:48, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org (mailto:brian@freeswitch.org)> wrote:
So I have the impression you or someone has an ooh323 module and hasn't contributed it back to the project yet? -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org (mailto:brian@freeswitch.org) FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire T: +1.918.420.9266 (tel:%2B1.918.420.9266) | F: +1.918.420.9267 (tel:%2B1.918.420.9267) | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9266 (tel:%2B883%205100%201420%209266) UK: +44 20 3298 4900 (tel:%2B44%2020%203298%204900) ISN: 410*543
On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:49 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com (mailto:steveayre@gmail.com)> wrote:
Hi Brian,
The issue would be that Asterisk's modifications are on a version predating the FLOSS exemption and their project is GPL - so presumably their modifications are all GPL-only?
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 00:40, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org (mailto:brian@freeswitch.org)> wrote: If someone wanted to build ooh323 module for FreeSWITCH we do have permission to do so using the lib.
/b
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org (mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org) http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org (mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org) http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org (mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org) http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org (mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org) http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
mod_opal and mod_h323 are based on the opal and h323plus libraries. Both are forks of the open323 library (which is discontinued). h323plus aims to remain API compatible with open323, while it seems opal aims to become a more generic telecoms library with support for SIP IAX etc too. ooh323c is a completely separate library with no shared code. mod_h323 and mod_opal both seem to have stability problems. Partly that seems to come from the heavy dependance of the libraries on specific matching versions of ptlib, partly that seems to be the libraries themselves. Both Asterisk and YATE appear to have stability problems using h323plus/openh323. Anecdotally the ooh323c Asterisk module is more stable... I'd need to look into it further, but the ooh323c library implements H323 and leaves RTP/codecs to the app. h323plus/opal implement them themselves (overridable I imagine). That means adding support to ooh323c may end up being easier, in theory. But that's a guess without researching it... Steve On 15 Feb 2013, at 23:36, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:
So we basically have 3 options, Opal, h323 and ooh323c, what's the difference among them?
Also, I'm aware that video is not supported in the current mod_opal and mod_h323, is it possible(or how hard) to add video support? Or does ooh323c easy to support video?
We'd like to contribute a little money to speed it up if it can support video and some want to work on it.
-- Seven Du http://www.freeswitch.org.cn http://about.me/dujinfang http://www.dujinfang.com
Sent with Sparrow
On Friday, February 15, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Steven Ayre wrote:
There's a module for Asterisk but none for FS I'm aware of yet - I'm only wondering about the feasibility of writing one.
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 14:48, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
So I have the impression you or someone has an ooh323 module and hasn't contributed it back to the project yet? -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire T: +1.918.420.9266 | F: +1.918.420.9267 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9266 UK: +44 20 3298 4900 ISN: 410*543
On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:49 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brian,
The issue would be that Asterisk's modifications are on a version predating the FLOSS exemption and their project is GPL - so presumably their modifications are all GPL-only?
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 00:40, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote: If someone wanted to build ooh323 module for FreeSWITCH we do have permission to do so using the lib.
/b
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Fun fact... Guess who Digium paid to hash out the skeleton for that ooh323 mod....?? ;) On Feb 15, 2013 7:01 PM, "Steven Ayre" <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
mod_opal and mod_h323 are based on the opal and h323plus libraries. Both are forks of the open323 library (which is discontinued). h323plus aims to remain API compatible with open323, while it seems opal aims to become a more generic telecoms library with support for SIP IAX etc too.
ooh323c is a completely separate library with no shared code.
mod_h323 and mod_opal both seem to have stability problems. Partly that seems to come from the heavy dependance of the libraries on specific matching versions of ptlib, partly that seems to be the libraries themselves. Both Asterisk and YATE appear to have stability problems using h323plus/openh323. Anecdotally the ooh323c Asterisk module is more stable...
I'd need to look into it further, but the ooh323c library implements H323 and leaves RTP/codecs to the app. h323plus/opal implement them themselves (overridable I imagine). That means adding support to ooh323c may end up being easier, in theory. But that's a guess without researching it...
Steve
On 15 Feb 2013, at 23:36, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:
So we basically have 3 options, Opal, h323 and ooh323c, what's the difference among them?
Also, I'm aware that video is not supported in the current mod_opal and mod_h323, is it possible(or how hard) to add video support? Or does ooh323c easy to support video?
We'd like to contribute a little money to speed it up if it can support video and some want to work on it.
-- Seven Du http://www.freeswitch.org.cn http://about.me/dujinfang http://www.dujinfang.com
Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
On Friday, February 15, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Steven Ayre wrote:
There's a module for Asterisk but none for FS I'm aware of yet - I'm only wondering about the feasibility of writing one.
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 14:48, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
So I have the impression you or someone has an ooh323 module and hasn't contributed it back to the project yet? -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire T: +1.918.420.9266 | F: +1.918.420.9267 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9266 UK: +44 20 3298 4900 ISN: 410*543
On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:49 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brian,
The issue would be that Asterisk's modifications are on a version predating the FLOSS exemption and their project is GPL - so presumably their modifications are all GPL-only?
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 00:40, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote: If someone wanted to build ooh323 module for FreeSWITCH we do have permission to do so using the lib.
/b
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Ha. Wouldn't surprise me at all. :o> On 17 February 2013 05:37, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com>wrote:
Fun fact...
Guess who Digium paid to hash out the skeleton for that ooh323 mod....??
;) On Feb 15, 2013 7:01 PM, "Steven Ayre" <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
mod_opal and mod_h323 are based on the opal and h323plus libraries. Both are forks of the open323 library (which is discontinued). h323plus aims to remain API compatible with open323, while it seems opal aims to become a more generic telecoms library with support for SIP IAX etc too.
ooh323c is a completely separate library with no shared code.
mod_h323 and mod_opal both seem to have stability problems. Partly that seems to come from the heavy dependance of the libraries on specific matching versions of ptlib, partly that seems to be the libraries themselves. Both Asterisk and YATE appear to have stability problems using h323plus/openh323. Anecdotally the ooh323c Asterisk module is more stable...
I'd need to look into it further, but the ooh323c library implements H323 and leaves RTP/codecs to the app. h323plus/opal implement them themselves (overridable I imagine). That means adding support to ooh323c may end up being easier, in theory. But that's a guess without researching it...
Steve
On 15 Feb 2013, at 23:36, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:
So we basically have 3 options, Opal, h323 and ooh323c, what's the difference among them?
Also, I'm aware that video is not supported in the current mod_opal and mod_h323, is it possible(or how hard) to add video support? Or does ooh323c easy to support video?
We'd like to contribute a little money to speed it up if it can support video and some want to work on it.
-- Seven Du http://www.freeswitch.org.cn http://about.me/dujinfang http://www.dujinfang.com
Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
On Friday, February 15, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Steven Ayre wrote:
There's a module for Asterisk but none for FS I'm aware of yet - I'm only wondering about the feasibility of writing one.
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 14:48, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
So I have the impression you or someone has an ooh323 module and hasn't contributed it back to the project yet? -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire T: +1.918.420.9266 | F: +1.918.420.9267 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9266 UK: +44 20 3298 4900 ISN: 410*543
On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:49 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brian,
The issue would be that Asterisk's modifications are on a version predating the FLOSS exemption and their project is GPL - so presumably their modifications are all GPL-only?
-Steve
On 15 February 2013 00:40, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote: If someone wanted to build ooh323 module for FreeSWITCH we do have permission to do so using the lib.
/b
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
The one you tell us about after you test them both =D I honestly don't know. On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Saeed Ahmed <saeedahmad1981@gmail.com>wrote:
Dear FSers,
which one is better to use when there are higher number of concurrent calls? *ooH323 *or *mod_h323*.
Thanks _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
Ok i'll test mod_h323 first. Will submit my results :) On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:
The one you tell us about after you test them both =D I honestly don't know.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Saeed Ahmed <saeedahmad1981@gmail.com>wrote:
Dear FSers,
which one is better to use when there are higher number of concurrent calls? *ooH323 *or *mod_h323*.
Thanks _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org> googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org> pstn:+19193869900
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
participants (9)
-
Anthony Minessale
-
Avi Marcus
-
Brian West
-
Michael Collins
-
Saeed Ahmed
-
Sergey Okhapkin
-
Seven Du
-
Steve Underwood
-
Steven Ayre