The q931cause parameter gets added in this revision:
How intense are their patches? The reason I ask is that while a blind C&P of their patches into the recent version would most likely result in a GPL violation, looking at what the code does and mimicking the functionality with new code most certainly would not result in a violation. (GPL covers "derivation" but not "inspiration" as it were. It's the whole copyright "idea" vs. "expression" dichotomy...)Anyway, I was just curious what's involved. Possibly other interested parties would be in a position to help out.-MCOn Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________________Indeed comparing the COPYING files, the Asterisk one lacks the FLOSS exception. So that version isn't usable, and neither is copying their patches into the 0.9.4 version since they'd be GPL-only.So while 0.9.4 would be usable, it'd lack some useful functionality (Q.931 causes are just the one I spotted from a 5 minute glance through the API).-SteveOn 13 February 2013 12:27, Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:I was just looking at this library to play with the idea of writing a mod_ooh323c. It looks like the library may have forked away from the version used in Asterisk though?The latest version on the website (http://www.obj-sys.com/telephony-objective.shtml) is 0.9.4, but cannot hangup with a Q.931 hangup cause. The CVS repository (sourceforge.net/projects/ooh323c) doesn't seem up-to-date since that's only holding 0.9.0.The version in asterisk has been patched to add a q931cause parameter to ooHangCall so it can - but it seems to be based off 'v0.8.3m' and I don't know if that's before the FLOSS exception was added.So does anyone more familiar with the library know whether the repository had been moved elsewhere, or whether there's a more recent version somewhere else, and whether the one bundled in Asterisk would be usable?-SteveOn 5 July 2010 15:28, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
It has a FLOSS exception in the GPL license.
/b
On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> On 07/03/2010 04:28 AM, Brian West wrote:
>> DOH... btw ooh323 is now license compatible with FreeSWITCH if anyone wants to write one.
>>
>> /b
>>
> Where did you see that? The current ooh323c tarball still says GPL 2.
>
> Steve
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com--
Michael S Collins
Twitter: @mercutioviz
http://www.FreeSWITCH.org
http://www.ClueCon.com
http://www.OSTAG.org
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org