- FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

FreeSwitch - Skype
by Shamun toha md 08 Aug '10

08 Aug '10

Hello, I have few questions about FS and Skype, and very confuse. Please kindly can someone give me some advise? Assume A, B, C: ============= - A to use skype messenger or mobile/land line numbers to place a call (A is a flying person, who can be in CAR/Train or office or home or restaurant) - B will always receive calls in sip phone or skype messenger (B is a static person, he is in computer, his job is operator role for every call) - C is call receiver, by B only ( C is flying person, who can be in CAR/ Train or even office waiting in Skype messenger) - A is caller, B is Operator, who decide if C will be connected, and C is waiting for a call. - A is logged in to skype messenger or not - B is logged in to skype messenger or sip phone to FS server - C is logged in to skype messenger or not - FS is installed with Skype incoming numbers + skypeID's Question: ======= Can caller A make call from his skype messenger to FS skypeID? How B will know about this call? How C can be connected by B? How the flow happens in FS and Skype? In terms of Sipphone vs Skype Messenger? Thank you Best regards

7 20

FS frequent crashes when using txfax
by Anurag Srivastava 08 Aug '10

08 Aug '10

Segfault in fs that happens pretty consistently (but not always) when using txfax. Attaching the backtrace from gdb on the core file and the log on fs_cli. http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/13602 I did a "make current" to get on the latest version. Running on ubuntu hardy thanks Anurag git log. -------- commit 9b4ab6f87798b8e7a65d05357ee7fcd82551cfd5 Date: Fri Aug 6 11:23:31 2010 +0200 gdb core backtrace ---------------------------- (gdb) bt #0 0xb7b88869 in strcasecmp () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #1 0xb6b9d093 in negotiate_t38 (pvt=0x82e41e0) at mod_spandsp_fax.c:760 #2 0xb6ba1c06 in mod_spandsp_fax_process_fax (session=0x82dbca8, .... -- Regards Anurag Srivastava

2 1

freeswitch and zrtp
by Andrea Medusei 08 Aug '10

08 Aug '10

Hi all, I'm deploying a ippbx with freeswitch and zrtp. It seems to work, but when i place a call i can't hear clean. It's impossible to understand what people say. I'm using tivi client for symbian s60. Both end have zrtp support (one unlimited and one passive licence). I also installed FS with zrtp support. Ccalls went to secure mode correctly but I can't hear nothing. I tried to install another FS, I get this error: switch_rtp.c:2122 Error: zRTP protection drop with code 9. I'm a little desperate :-) Any similar experience or possible solutions?

1 0

Mod_easyroute w/postgresql-odbc Cannot Find Data Source Name and Default Driver
by Jerry Richards 08 Aug '10

08 Aug '10

I'm having trouble getting mod_easyroute to work with odbc postgresql. Please see the error I am getting below. Is there someone who has done this and could tell me what I'm doing wrong? Here is the error I'm getting: [ERR] switch_odbc.c:313 STATE IM002 CODE 0 ERROR: [unixODBC][Driver Manager]Data source name not found, and no default driver specified [CRIT] mod_easyroute.c:147 Cannot Open ODBC Database! Here is my conf/autoload_configs/easyroute_conf.xml content: <param name="db-username" value="postgres"/> <param name="db-password" value="password"/> <param name="db-dsn" value="ez:postgres:password"/> Here is my odbc.ini content: [ez] Description = PostgreSQL Unicode Driver = PostgreSQL Unicode Trace = No TraceFile = /home/TeoUser/db/psqlodbc.log Database = ez Servername = 127.0.0.1 UserName = postgres Password = password Port = 5432 ReadOnly = Yes RowVersioning = No ShowSystemTables = No ShowOidColumn = No FakeOidIndex = No ConnSettings = Here is my odbcinst.ini file content: [PostgreSQL] Description = ODBC for PostgreSQL Driver = /usr/lib/libodbcpsql.so Setup = /usr/lib/libodbcpsqlS.so FileUsage = 1 Thanks And Best Regards, Jerry

2 1

Skype message event miss match in concurrent call
by xuyan yang 08 Aug '10

08 Aug '10

Hi, I am using skypopne with 2 account A and B. And A is the callee to receive call. During the call skype chat message is used as a method of input. According to skypopen logic, when C call A first and then D call A. B will pick up the call from D. On some mobile version skype, the transfer from A to B is not reported to mobile user. So user D will still send message to A. In my event processing script(in js). The session C->A will receive all message D sent to A while D to B session receive nothing. Hence caller D will not be responsed by system. Is there any way to handler this situation? For example, when C->A session receive a message from D, can I fire it again into D to B session?

2 1

No audio for 3 seconds on some calls
by Ash 08 Aug '10

08 Aug '10

Hi All, I am running freeswitch 1.0.6 and some users have reported that they will be on a call and the audio will go silent for 3 seconds. This doesn't appear to be happening to all users. So far, I have done the following: - Internal and External profiles set <param name="rtp-autofix-timing" value="false" /> ( I was getting the RTP warning about ptime being 30 and all phones are set to 20ms) - Set the phone to use PCMA and made sure its PCMA through to the provider - We have installed a SIP Proxy at the other location so the voip phones all go via the SIP Proxy as we thought it might be a NAT issue. - Disabled VAD and CNG on the phone - The remote phones are connected via a DSL service but this appears to be rock solid and averages response times between 10ms and 40ms. I thought it might be something with VAD, is VAD disabled by default or should I add to the internal and external profiles <param name="vad" value="none"/ > Has anyone else come across something like this before? Maybe some other ways I can investigate what is going wrong? Any help would be much appreciated. Ash.

2 3

freeswitch as fax/voice router
by milosz 06 Aug '10

06 Aug '10

hi all, i am looking to use freeswitch to do uc fax/voice routing for my user did's. my users are on an ip pbx already (sipx, but the pre-freeswitch version, at least for now). i have calls coming into a pri and i'd like to use freeswitch to do fax detection on the call and do either fax-to-email or send the call to sipx. is anyone doing anything like this? is it feasible? clues for how to get started? thanks milosz

2 1

Re: [Freeswitch-users] destination_number question
by Madovsky 06 Aug '10

06 Aug '10

:) to be more precise it needs [] with OR <condition field="destination_number" expression="^([1|5|23|]\d{10,15})"/> Sent from my commodre 64 Franck ----- Original Message ----- From: msc(a)freeswitch.org To: Madovsky Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 4:06 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] destination_number question I think you have seen the light! Remember that stacking conditions results in a logical AND statement. Like you mentioned, using alternation (that is, using the pipe) is how you do logical OR statements. -MC Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint! ----- Reply message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos(a)madovsky.org> Date: Thu, Aug 5, 2010 10:25 pm Subject: [Freeswitch-users] destination_number question To: <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> I think I need to rest, drink and smoke again.... what I neded was simply an expression like this <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(1|5|23|etc...\d{10,15})"/> ----- Original Message ----- From: msc(a)freeswitch.org To: Madovsky Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 9:02 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] destination_number question You could but why? In your example the blahblah would never get executed because there is no dest num that could possibly match both conditions. What are you trying to accomplish? Also, don't forget that Darren did a great job of explaining this kind of thing in chapter 8 of the FS book. -MC - Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint! ----- Reply message ----- From: "Madovsky" <infos(a)madovsky.org> Date: Thu, Aug 5, 2010 2:30 pm Subject: [Freeswitch-users] destination_number question To: <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> have some doubt can I have destination_number stacked condition like <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(1\d{10,15})"/> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(54\d{10,14})"> blablablaa </condition> Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: Madovsky To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:00 PM Subject: destination_number question if I call from a sip phone for ex 99999999@mydomain and use <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(99999999})"/> in dialplan it fails. I need to remove the << ^ >> and it works. so I there any chars in front of the number in destination_number variable if I call from SIP phone ? Thanks Franck

1 0

nibbleBill action extension
by Madovsky 06 Aug '10

06 Aug '10

Is it possible to have different extension for lowbal and nobal action ? for ex I d like to play a different wave for a leg B and leg A Thanks F

2 3

Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users Digest, Vol 50, Issue 28
by Gustavo Espeche 06 Aug '10

06 Aug '10

Hi i'm suggest debian lenny, and connect to a database through mod_cul, we reach excellent result with this combination. Regards. Gustavo Espeche www.easyipcall.com EasyTrade Billing/Routing On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 01:22 -0700, freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org wrote: > Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to > freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freeswitch-users-owner(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Different versions, different cpu load > (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum) > 2. Re: Different versions, different cpu load > (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum) > 3. Re: Different versions, different cpu load > (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum) > 4. Re: Different versions, different cpu load (Seven Du) > MHTML Document attachment > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982(a)gmail.com> > > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu > > load > > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:33:22 +0200 > > > > Which distro do you sugest? > > > > Regards > > > > 2010/8/5 Brian West <brian(a)freeswitch.org> > > Ubuntu is a common theme when someone says "OMG IT USES ALL > > MY CPU!" > > > > > > /b > > > > On Aug 5, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Madovsky wrote: > > > > > ubunto is a nice linux distrib for audio station, not > > > servers... > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Brian West" <brian(a)freeswitch.org> > > > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > > > <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:50 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, > > > different cpu load > > > > > > > > > > Or stop using ubuntu. > > > > > > > > /b > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > MHTML Document attachment > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982(a)gmail.com> > > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu > > load > > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:36:28 +0200 > > > > I've got about 75% decrease in performarce. I am using same server > > and same config. DB was already in ramdisk as svn version so I don't > > find an explanation for it... > > > > Regards > > > > 2010/8/5 Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch(a)gmail.com> > > My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a > > 25% > > performance drop between the old SVN version I was running > > and the new > > GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported > > performance > > drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to > > 25%. I am > > unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a > > ramdisk, so > > the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have > > the db on > > a ramdisk. > > > > 2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum > > <juanito1982(a)gmail.com>: > > > > > No one experiment this same issue? > > > > > > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum > > <juanito1982(a)gmail.com> > > >> > > >> Hello! > > >> > > >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version > > downloaded some weeks > > >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has > > some problems with > > >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version > > (FreeSWITCH Version > > >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that > > seems to solve this > > >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing > > with svn version. > > >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU > > load into a dual > > >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this > > 75% cpu. I can see > > >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in > > git version) and > > >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now > > it uses more cpu > > >> than before. Any idea? > > >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip > > provider. > > >> > > >> Regards > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Eliot Gable > > > > "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow > > it from our > > children." ~David Brower > > > > "I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not > > borrowing > > from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not > > even > > considered to be a crime." ~David Brower > > > > "Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst > > eat to > > live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > MHTML Document attachment > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982(a)gmail.com> > > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu > > load > > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:39:43 +0200 > > > > I thinkg it is very difficult to find it without a good knowledge of > > FS internals. Do you know if there is any way to make a profiling > > which could help? > > > > Regards > > > > 2010/8/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa(a)rupa.com> > > sounds like a good opportunity to try git-bisect to locate > > where the performance change occurs. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Eliot Gable <egable > > +freeswitch(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago > > showed a 25% > > performance drop between the old SVN version I was > > running and the new > > GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your > > reported performance > > drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it > > went to 25%. I am > > unsure of whether my initial testing was using the > > db on a ramdisk, so > > the drop could be higher if my previous testing did > > not have the db on > > a ramdisk. > > > > 2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum > > <juanito1982(a)gmail.com>: > > > > > No one experiment this same issue? > > > > > > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum > > <juanito1982(a)gmail.com> > > >> > > >> Hello! > > >> > > >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version > > downloaded some weeks > > >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but > > it has some problems with > > >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git > > version (FreeSWITCH Version > > >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) > > that seems to solve this > > >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load > > comparing with svn version. > > >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a > > 75% CPU load into a dual > > >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls > > consume this 75% cpu. I can see > > >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module > > needed in git version) and > > >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find > > why now it uses more cpu > > >> than before. Any idea? > > >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an > > external sip provider. > > >> > > >> Regards > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Eliot Gable > > > > "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we > > borrow it from our > > children." ~David Brower > > > > "I decided the words were too conservative for me. > > We're not borrowing > > from our children, we're stealing from them--and > > it's not even > > considered to be a crime." ~David Brower > > > > "Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou > > shouldst eat to > > live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -Rupa > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > MHTML Document attachment > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Seven Du <dujinfang(a)gmail.com> > > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help > > <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu > > load > > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:22:10 +0800 > > > > Were both of your kernel running on 1000HZ ? > > > > 2010/8/6 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982(a)gmail.com>: > > > I've got about 75% decrease in performarce. I am using same server and same > > > config. DB was already in ramdisk as svn version so I don't find an > > > explanation for it... > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > 2010/8/5 Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch(a)gmail.com> > > >> > > >> My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a 25% > > >> performance drop between the old SVN version I was running and the new > > >> GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported performance > > >> drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to 25%. I am > > >> unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a ramdisk, so > > >> the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have the db on > > >> a ramdisk. > > >> > > >> 2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982(a)gmail.com>: > > >> > No one experiment this same issue? > > >> > > > >> > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup. > > >> > > > >> > Regards > > >> > > > >> > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982(a)gmail.com> > > >> >> > > >> >> Hello! > > >> >> > > >> >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version downloaded some weeks > > >> >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has some problems > > >> >> with > > >> >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version (FreeSWITCH > > >> >> Version > > >> >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that seems to solve > > >> >> this > > >> >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing with svn > > >> >> version. > > >> >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU load into a > > >> >> dual > > >> >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this 75% cpu. I > > >> >> can see > > >> >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in git version) > > >> >> and > > >> >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now it uses more > > >> >> cpu > > >> >> than before. Any idea? > > >> >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip provider. > > >> >> > > >> >> Regards > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > >> > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > >> > http://www.freeswitch.org > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Eliot Gable > > >> > > >> "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow it from our > > >> children." ~David Brower > > >> > > >> "I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not borrowing > > >> from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not even > > >> considered to be a crime." ~David Brower > > >> > > >> "Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst eat to > > >> live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > >> FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org

1 0