Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users Digest, Vol 50, Issue 28

6 Aug 2010


      Hi i'm suggest debian lenny, and connect to a database through mod_cul,
we reach excellent result with this combination.
Regards.

Gustavo Espeche
www.easyipcall.com
EasyTrade Billing/Routing

On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 01:22 -0700,
freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org wrote:
...
Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to
  freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
  http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
  freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
  freeswitch-users-owner@lists.freeswitch.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Different versions, different cpu load
      (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum)
   2. Re: Different versions, different cpu load
      (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum)
   3. Re: Different versions, different cpu load
      (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum)
   4. Re: Different versions, different cpu load (Seven Du)
MHTML Document attachment
...
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>
Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help
<freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu
load
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:33:22 +0200
Which distro do you sugest?
Regards
2010/8/5 Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org>
        Ubuntu is a common theme when someone says "OMG IT USES ALL
        MY CPU!"
/b
On Aug 5, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Madovsky wrote:
> ubunto is a nice linux distrib for audio station, not
        > servers...
        > 
        > ----- Original Message ----- 
        > From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org>
        > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help"
        > <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
        > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:50 PM
        > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions,
        > different cpu load
        > 
        > 
        > > Or stop using ubuntu.
        > > 
        > > /b
_______________________________________________
        FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
        FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
        http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
        UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
        http://www.freeswitch.org
MHTML Document attachment
...
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>
Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help
<freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu
load
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:36:28 +0200
I've got about 75% decrease in performarce. I am using same server
and same config. DB was already in ramdisk as svn version so I don't
find an explanation for it...
Regards
2010/8/5 Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch@gmail.com>
        My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a
        25%
        performance drop between the old SVN version I was running
        and the new
        GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported
        performance
        drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to
        25%. I am
        unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a
        ramdisk, so
        the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have
        the db on
        a ramdisk.
2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
        <juanito1982@gmail.com>:
> No one experiment this same issue?
        >
        > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
        >
        > Regards
        >
        > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
        <juanito1982@gmail.com>
        >>
        >> Hello!
        >>
        >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version
        downloaded some weeks
        >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has
        some problems with
        >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version
        (FreeSWITCH Version
        >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that
        seems to solve this
        >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing
        with svn version.
        >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU
        load into a dual
        >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this
        75% cpu. I can see
        >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in
        git version) and
        >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now
        it uses more cpu
        >> than before. Any idea?
        >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip
        provider.
        >>
        >> Regards
        >
        >
> _______________________________________________
        > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
        > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
        >
        http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
        >
        UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
        > http://www.freeswitch.org
        >
        >
--
        Eliot Gable
"We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow
        it from our
        children." ~David Brower
"I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not
        borrowing
        from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not
        even
        considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
"Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst
        eat to
        live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
_______________________________________________
        FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
        FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
        http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
        UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
        http://www.freeswitch.org
MHTML Document attachment
...
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>
Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help
<freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu
load
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:39:43 +0200
I thinkg it is very difficult to find it without a good knowledge of
FS internals. Do you know if there is any way to make a profiling
which could help?
Regards
2010/8/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
        sounds like a good opportunity to try git-bisect to locate
        where the performance change occurs.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Eliot Gable <egable
        +freeswitch@gmail.com> wrote:
                My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago
                showed a 25%
                performance drop between the old SVN version I was
                running and the new
                GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your
                reported performance
                drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it
                went to 25%. I am
                unsure of whether my initial testing was using the
                db on a ramdisk, so
                the drop could be higher if my previous testing did
                not have the db on
                a ramdisk.
2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
                <juanito1982@gmail.com>:
> No one experiment this same issue?
                >
                > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
                >
                > Regards
                >
                > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
                <juanito1982@gmail.com>
                >>
                >> Hello!
                >>
                >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version
                downloaded some weeks
                >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but
                it has some problems with
                >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git
                version (FreeSWITCH Version
                >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400))
                that seems to solve this
                >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load
                comparing with svn version.
                >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a
                75% CPU load into a dual
                >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls
                consume this 75% cpu. I can see
                >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module
                needed in git version) and
                >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find
                why now it uses more cpu
                >> than before. Any idea?
                >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an
                external sip provider.
                >>
                >> Regards
                >
                >
> _______________________________________________
                > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
                > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
                >
                http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
                >
                UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
                > http://www.freeswitch.org
                >
                >
--
                Eliot Gable
"We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we
                borrow it from our
                children." ~David Brower
"I decided the words were too conservative for me.
                We're not borrowing
                from our children, we're stealing from them--and
                it's not even
                considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
"Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou
                shouldst eat to
                live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
_______________________________________________
                FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
                FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
                http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
                UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
                http://www.freeswitch.org
-- 
        -Rupa
_______________________________________________
        FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
        FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
        http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
        UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
        http://www.freeswitch.org
MHTML Document attachment
...
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com>
Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help
<freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu
load
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:22:10 +0800
Were both of your kernel running on 1000HZ ?
2010/8/6 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>:
...
I've got about 75% decrease in performarce. I am using same server and same
config. DB was already in ramdisk as svn version so I don't find an
explanation for it...
Regards
2010/8/5 Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch@gmail.com>
...
My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a 25%
performance drop between the old SVN version I was running and the new
GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported performance
drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to 25%. I am
unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a ramdisk, so
the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have the db on
a ramdisk.
2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>:
...
No one experiment this same issue?
I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
Regards
2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>
...
Hello!
I was been some test using one FS tarball version downloaded some weeks
ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has some problems
with
odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version (FreeSWITCH
Version
1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that seems to solve
this
problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing with svn
version.
While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU load into a
dual
core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this 75% cpu. I
can see
same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in git version)
and
same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now it uses more
cpu
than before. Any idea?
Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip provider.
Regards
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Eliot Gable
"We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow it from our
children." ~David Brower
"I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not borrowing
from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not even
considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
"Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst eat to
live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Gustavo Espeche

tags

participants (1)