Hi i'm suggest debian lenny, and connect to a database through mod_cul, we reach excellent result with this combination. Regards. Gustavo Espeche www.easyipcall.com EasyTrade Billing/Routing On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 01:22 -0700, freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org wrote:
Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org
You can reach the person managing the list at freeswitch-users-owner@lists.freeswitch.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..." Today's Topics:
1. Re: Different versions, different cpu load (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum) 2. Re: Different versions, different cpu load (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum) 3. Re: Different versions, different cpu load (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum) 4. Re: Different versions, different cpu load (Seven Du) MHTML Document attachment
-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com> Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu load Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:33:22 +0200
Which distro do you sugest?
Regards
2010/8/5 Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> Ubuntu is a common theme when someone says "OMG IT USES ALL MY CPU!"
/b
On Aug 5, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Madovsky wrote:
> ubunto is a nice linux distrib for audio station, not > servers... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" > <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:50 PM > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, > different cpu load > > > > Or stop using ubuntu. > > > > /b
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
MHTML Document attachment
-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com> Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu load Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:36:28 +0200
I've got about 75% decrease in performarce. I am using same server and same config. DB was already in ramdisk as svn version so I don't find an explanation for it...
Regards
2010/8/5 Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch@gmail.com> My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a 25% performance drop between the old SVN version I was running and the new GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported performance drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to 25%. I am unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a ramdisk, so the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have the db on a ramdisk.
2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>:
> No one experiment this same issue? > > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup. > > Regards > > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com> >> >> Hello! >> >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version downloaded some weeks >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has some problems with >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version (FreeSWITCH Version >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that seems to solve this >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing with svn version. >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU load into a dual >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this 75% cpu. I can see >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in git version) and >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now it uses more cpu >> than before. Any idea? >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip provider. >> >> Regards > >
> _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > >
-- Eliot Gable
"We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow it from our children." ~David Brower
"I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not borrowing from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not even considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
"Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst eat to live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
MHTML Document attachment
-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com> Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu load Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:39:43 +0200
I thinkg it is very difficult to find it without a good knowledge of FS internals. Do you know if there is any way to make a profiling which could help?
Regards
2010/8/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com> sounds like a good opportunity to try git-bisect to locate where the performance change occurs.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Eliot Gable <egable +freeswitch@gmail.com> wrote: My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a 25% performance drop between the old SVN version I was running and the new GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported performance drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to 25%. I am unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a ramdisk, so the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have the db on a ramdisk.
2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>:
> No one experiment this same issue? > > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup. > > Regards > > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com> >> >> Hello! >> >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version downloaded some weeks >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has some problems with >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version (FreeSWITCH Version >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that seems to solve this >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing with svn version. >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU load into a dual >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this 75% cpu. I can see >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in git version) and >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now it uses more cpu >> than before. Any idea? >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip provider. >> >> Regards > >
> _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > >
-- Eliot Gable
"We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow it from our children." ~David Brower
"I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not borrowing from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not even considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
"Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst eat to live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- -Rupa
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
MHTML Document attachment
-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu load Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:22:10 +0800
Were both of your kernel running on 1000HZ ?
2010/8/6 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>:
I've got about 75% decrease in performarce. I am using same server and same config. DB was already in ramdisk as svn version so I don't find an explanation for it...
Regards
2010/8/5 Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch@gmail.com>
My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a 25% performance drop between the old SVN version I was running and the new GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported performance drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to 25%. I am unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a ramdisk, so the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have the db on a ramdisk.
2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>:
No one experiment this same issue?
I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
Regards
2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>
Hello!
I was been some test using one FS tarball version downloaded some weeks ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has some problems with odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that seems to solve this problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing with svn version. While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU load into a dual core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this 75% cpu. I can see same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in git version) and same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now it uses more cpu than before. Any idea? Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip provider.
Regards
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Eliot Gable
"We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow it from our children." ~David Brower
"I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not borrowing from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not even considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
"Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst eat to live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org