- FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

Relay a REGISTER
by igor.potjevlesch＠gmail.com 21 Dec '18

21 Dec '18

Hello, I'd like to relay a REGISTER received on leg A to the leg B. The idea is to have a Contact URI with the B leg IP address when the REGISTER goes out of the FS. But I didn't found how to avoid Freeswitch to handle the REGISTER locally. Regards, Igor.

4 4

usernames whith special simbols cant recive calls on FS 1.8
by Miguel Jesús López Valverde 20 Dec '18

20 Dec '18

Hello again guys: I'm sending this question in case someone can tell me how to solve the following problem. We currently have a production platform working with FS 1.6 where users have historically been created in the form username~companyname like usernames and the incoming calls to these users work correctly. Also, a request on console like sofia_contact nameusername~companyname@domain returns a right result. Now I am considering the migration of these platforms to FS 1.8 and, for this, doing an assembly of initial development. Here I have been able to verify that although these users register correctly, they can issue outgoing calls and appear correctly listed in queries of type sofia status profile internal reg, but these users cant receive incoming calls, in console the information " Cannot create outgoing channel of type [error] cause: [USER_NOT_REGISTERED] " is always obtained and when I launch the query sofia_contact nameusername~companyname@domain in console, I get the result error/user_not_registered; I only have to change the value ~ for example by a dot and the incoming calls works correctly and also the query sofia_contact nameusername.companyname@domain return a right result. I guess I need to adjust the configuration of some library of FS 1.8 and recompile it to get back an identical operation to version 1.6, can someone help me in indicating which library or with what adjustment I could get this operation again? Thank you very much and best regards!! Miguel J. Lopez. --- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

3 3

FS 1.8 Docker image
by Filipe Cunha 20 Dec '18

20 Dec '18

Hi all, I'm trying to create a docker image with the latest version of FreeSWITCH. But I'm not able to do it. These are the steps that I did to try to do it. 1. Download debian stretch image *docker pull debian:stretch * 2. Build FreeSWITCH from source code following the guide <https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/Debian+9+Stretch> in confluence step by step. I follow the production version 3. The step 2 went very well, and then I follow the post-installation instructions <https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/Debian+Post-Install+Ta…> and this was when it stop working. I set up owners and permissions and when I try to do the systemd I was not able to do it. I copied the file *cp /usr/src/freeswitch/debian/freeswitch-systemd.freeswitch.service /etc/systemd/system/freeswitch.service *the content of the file was not exactly the same as the one in the tutorial, so I copied the content of the file on the tutorial and replace it. And when I tried to do *systemctl deamon-reload* I got this error message, *Failed to connect to bus: No such file or directory*. After trying to find a solution online I found this answer on SO <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39169403/systemd-and-systemctl-within-u…> Do you guys know if there is a solution for this problem? We plan to use the latest version of FreeSwitch in our production environment, but we have a normal linux server to do it, and the devops team got everything working fine, we only have this problem when we try to use docker. I'm trying to use docker so my team could test everything locally before pushing something to the test environment, so far we have been deploying our code to test environment to test our code 😖 I found this image <https://github.com/BetterVoice/freeswitch-container> that works fine in our local environment, but the version is 1.6.16. Is there any braking change between 1.8.2 and 1.6.16? My concern it that we start developing against an older version, and when we deploy to production it doesn't work, or maybe the latest version have a super useful command that we are not taking advantage of. We control FreeSWITCH mainly by events, we use java to do it. Thanks for the help, Filipe Cunha

6 9

Audio delayed for about 3sec.
by 王聡 20 Dec '18

20 Dec '18

Hey all, Today I moved my freeswitch server from VM to cloud server, but I found there has an audio delay on both caller and receiver for about 3sec in each call during call test. Is there any idea for this audio delay? Regards.

7 13

Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users Digest, Vol 150, Issue 16
by Melek Oktay 20 Dec '18

20 Dec '18

*the problem isnt freeswitch, but your event consumer isnt consuming the events fast enough. you should adjust your side of the equation.the event queue is what drives everything * Hi again, I think FreeSwitch core mechanism should not be blocked when user module consuming thread is not fast enough. Per-module event queue with multi-thread consumer thread mechanism could solve this issue, or something else (i don't know). Since user can add its module to the Freeswitch, s/he could not block core of freeswitch since its wrong action i think. Regards On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 1:31 PM < freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org> wrote: > Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to > freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freeswitch-users-owner(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: FreeSwitch blocked (Ken Rice) > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ken Rice <krice(a)freeswitch.org> > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 03:03:30 -0600 > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch blocked > the problem isnt freeswitch, but your event consumer isnt consuming the > events fast enough. you should adjust your side of the equation. > > the event queue is what drives everything > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 01:29, Melek Oktay <melekoktay(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > After deeply research about this issue, we understand *Freeswitch-Core* > mechanism and three possible solutions for fixing these issue. > > Here the link > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53609817/freeswitch-blocked > > Actually it would be be better third solution supported by *Freeswitch*, > before deliver event to module, it create new thread for not waiting > consumer thread (event hendler) > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:35 AM Melek Oktay <melekoktay(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> FreeSwitch software working well in a few days (~3 - 5 days), then new >> incoming call requests are accepted since FreeSwitch is blocked !! Ongoing >> calls continue their session, their calls seems not effected, but new calls >> are not accepted. I got FreeSwitch snapshot and analyzed it in GDB. >> >> I have 601 therads & most of them are waiting >> >> Thread 0x7f16bc55f700 (LWP 28544) pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at >> ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 >> >> When i apply "*thread apply all bt*" in gdb, I see most of the threads >> try to push events into queue (*switch_queue_push *) >> >> Thread 600 (Thread 0x7f16bc55f700 (LWP 28544)): >> #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at >> ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 >> #1 0x00007f180cf9b87d in apr_thread_cond_wait (cond=<optimized out>, >> mutex=<optimized out>) at locks/unix/thread_cond.c:68 >> #2 0x00007f180cf92dd0 in apr_queue_push (queue=queue@entry=0x7f180db157a8, >> data=data@entry=0x7f16d3d5ec20) at misc/apr_queue.c:166 >> #3 0x00007f180cc958fb in *switch_queue_push *(queue=*0x7f180db157a8*, >> data=data@entry=*0x7f16d3d5ec20*) at src/switch_apr.c:1134 >> #4 0x00007f180cd17850 in switch_event_queue_dispatch_event >> (eventp=0x7f16bc55ec48) at src/switch_event.c:384 >> #5 switch_event_fire_detailed (file=file@entry=0x7f180cfb07ea >> "src/switch_channel.c", func=func@entry=0x7f180cfb2ba0 <__func__.18348> >> "switch_channel_perform_set_running_state", line=line@entry=2260, >> event=event@entry=0x7f16bc55ec48, user_data=user_data@entry=0x0) at >> src/switch_event.c:1986 >> #6 0x00007f180cc9f118 in switch_channel_perform_set_running_state >> (channel=0x7f17e3e7de00, state=CS_NEW, file=0x7f180cfbc590 >> "src/switch_core_state_machine.c", func=<optimized out>, line=543) at >> src/switch_channel.c:2260 >> #7 0x00007f180ccc87d0 in switch_core_session_run >> (session=0x7f17e3e7fd28) at src/switch_core_state_machine.c:543 >> #8 0x00007f180ccc36de in switch_core_session_thread (thread=<optimized >> out>, obj=0x7f17e3e7fd28) at src/switch_core_session.c:1629 >> #9 0x00007f180ccbf47d in switch_core_session_thread_pool_worker >> (thread=0x7f17e3e9abb0, obj=0x80) at src/switch_core_session.c:1692 >> #10 0x00007f180cfa1910 in dummy_worker (opaque=0x7f17e3e9abb0) at >> threadproc/unix/thread.c:151 >> #11 0x00007f180c1e0064 in start_thread (arg=0x7f16bc55f700) at >> pthread_create.c:309 >> #12 0x00007f180b8b862d in clone () at >> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:111 >> >> >> More interesting thing is below, when I look up event type, approximately >> all of them are "SWITCH_EVENT_CHANNEL_STATE" and switch_queue (i think >> sofia_module queue is used in this scenario ) *become full* !!! *nelts* >> (number of elements ) and *bounds *values are equal, and there are 553 >> (full_waiters) waiters try to push , but no body try to consume it >> (empty_waiters = 0) >> >> (gdb) print *(switch_queue_t *) *0x7f180db157a8* >> $1 = { >> data = 0x7f1805cfe038, >> nelts = 50000, >> in = 43000, >> out = 43000, >> bounds = 50000, >> full_waiters = 553, >> empty_waiters = 0, >> one_big_mutex = 0x7f180db157e8, >> not_empty = 0x7f180db15838, >> not_full = 0x7f180db15890, >> terminated = 0 >> } >> >> (gdb) print *(switch_event_t *) *0x7f16d3d5ec20* >> $1 = { >> event_id = SWITCH_EVENT_CHANNEL_STATE, >> priority = SWITCH_PRIORITY_NORMAL, >> owner = 0x0, >> subclass_name = 0x0, >> headers = 0x7f16d3d5f750, >> last_header = 0x7f16d3d601d0, >> body = 0x0, >> bind_user_data = 0x0, >> event_user_data = 0x0, >> key = 0, >> next = 0x0, >> flags = 0 >> } >> >> >> Why i am gonna getting this state? >> >> Any thoughts, tips, tricks would be much appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> >> Angel >> >> _________________________________________________________________________ > Professional FreeSWITCH Services > sales(a)freeswitch.com > https://freeswitch.com > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > https://freeswitch.com/oss > https://freeswitch.org/confluence > https://cluecon.com > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > https://freeswitch.com > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org >

1 1

MOD_CALLCENTER cannot originate call to agent
by Chhorm Chhatra 19 Dec '18

19 Dec '18

Hi, Currently, I am experiencing a very weird behavior of mod_callcenter like the following: 1. after 4 to 5 mins of hearing the moh-sound, it started to randomly play media from the sound/music folder 2. MOD_CALLCENTER *can never bridge any call to the agent. It mostly says the user is not registered (although it's registered). Sometimes, it says no-answer but the agent never rings.* *Please kindly help me.*

2 3

transfer B-leg to a custom extension with execute_on_answer : fails
by Julien Terrasson 18 Dec '18

18 Dec '18

Hi everyone, I'm looking from advices on that issue : In the following scenario, where A & B are PSTN subscribers : STEP 1 : A call freeswitch, freeswitch answers and play an audio prompt. STEP 2 : when the prompt ends, freeswitch attempt to bridge A with B STEP 3 : B_answer. I set a no_local::execute_on_answer hook to park A and play B an audio prompt (warning message) when B_answer. But thuis is what happen when the bridge command is executed : CASE 1 : If the INVITE TO B is responded with a 183-SESSION_PROGRESS before the 200-OK, the execute_on_answer hook work as i expect (A is parked, B is played the audio prompt) CASE 2 : If the INVITE TO B is responded with a 200-OK, the execute_on_answer hook does not work as i expect (A is parked but hangup B with cause destination_out_of_order). >From the trace i can see that in CASE 1, B party is put in CS_EXCHANGE_MEDIA earlier than in CASE2 Would this be likely to create the problem ? Best Regards, Julien

1 0

calls to local 311 line with two IVRs
by George 18 Dec '18

18 Dec '18

when I call a local 311 number, the call goes through, I hear the first announcement, after with time the call is supposed to get transferred to a second IVR which should give the choices of departments, the call just goes silent and eventually gets hung on on. FreeSWITCH Version 1.8.2-3-a98a958ac3~64bit (-3-a98a958ac3 64bit) Debian 9.6 this is what my FS sends back to the provider: v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1544570427 1544570429 IN IP4 10.185.45.238 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 10.185.45.238 t=0 0 m=audio 16506 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=sendonly a=ptime:20 the provider says its because the a=sendonly I am not receiving the announcements any help on this? Thank You, George

4 5

ICTBroadcast Enterprise Edition free licenses available
by Tahir Almas 13 Dec '18

13 Dec '18

On completion of 10 years of ICTBroadcast , the unified telemarketing software, We are happy to offer free licenses of ICTBroadcast Enterprise Edition 2 channels , 5 channels , 10 channels and 50 channels licenses. Limited licenses Register now https://service.ictinnovations.com/cart.php?gid=1 http://www.ictbroadcast.com Regards *Tahir Almas* Managing Partner ICT Innovations http://www.ictinnovations.com Leveraging open source in ICT

1 0

One way audio case between FS and Chrome on WebRTC
by MARAND, Remi 12 Dec '18

12 Dec '18

Hello, I am trying to validate FS as a SIP to WebRTC Gateway in our lab environment. I started in middle October and have good result on it, but i cannot understand this One Way Audio trouble. I must thank the Freeswitch team and contributors for this very impressive work. FreeSWITCH Version 1.8.1-2-4f54cff36a~64bit (-2-4f54cff36a 64bit) On system: SMP Debian 4.9.110-3+deb9u6 (2018-10-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux Openssl version : OpenSSL 1.1.0f 25 May 2017 Chrome version: 69.0 (I tried with different version and with Firefox with the same trouble). The wss part is ok with sip.js and verto.js The Ice negotiation is ok, I use sometimes local networks and sometimes web, I have had to authorize networks in the candidate ACL and domain ACL (acl.conf.xml) The result is the same on both topology. DTLS negotiation is OK, and there is UDP streams between Chrome (or Firefox) and FS in both ways. There is no "audible" audio in the direction from FS to Chrome, the other direction is OK. The simplest test is to call the 5000 number from the Chrome client, I send you a paste bin and pcap trace for this call. Should you give me information element to progress on this, what is really mandatory in the sip_profile/internal.xml and external.xml files, and in directory/default/1000.xml for a WebRTC call ?? What should be the good options in fs_cli to see if the encryption of RTP packets is ok or not.. ? Do you think that I have to reinstall a Freeswitch from the current branch ? @IP for FS : 192.168.145.67 @IP for Chrome : 10.70.54.43 Link on the pastebin : https://pastebin.freeswitch.org/view/09a72087 I have a pcap on the same call that I can provide (3 Mb) if necessary.. Thank you for helping me !! Best regards. [Prosodie-signature]<http://www.prosodie.com/> Rémi Marand - Product Owner - Pod Connect. PROSODIE - Marketing & Produit Tél. : +33 (0)1.46.84.12.77 / 06.87.72.53.25 rmarand(a)prosodie.com<mailto:rmarand@prosodie.com> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

2 3