April 2013 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

avmd from mod managed
by Malay Thakershi 24 Mar '14

24 Mar '14

Hello, Is there a way to do AVMD from mod_managed? I see JavaScript example technique from http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_avmd but it seems signature of StreamFile is different in mod_managed. In JavaScript, second argument to StreamFile is a function (OnInput) where detection is done while is mod_managed, it is sample start number. So is AVMD possible from mod_managed? Thank you. Malay

2 2

Lenny's killing it.
by Gabriel Gunderson 26 Jan '14

26 Jan '14

No way! Lenny is on a roll! It's too perfect (listen in order)! 1) http://itslenny.com/recording.php?file=4d8cde0cc5a4d86ccf221aa5b2903e95 2) http://itslenny.com/recording.php?file=4fdd3f445fff8e1b73456af602367b6e Classic! Gabe

5 4

TLS error?
by Federico Beffa 27 Dec '13

27 Dec '13

Hi, I'm trying to setup FS as a gtalk client. I'm working on Linux Ubuntu 10.04 and have cloned the git FS repository about 1 week ago. I can compile everything with no errors. However, after configuring client.xml and starting FS I see the following error message in the freeswitch.log file: 2010-07-20 23:38:56.392853 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:926 Error Loading module /opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_ dingaling.so **/opt/freeswitch/mod/mod_dingaling.so: undefined symbol: gnutls_global_init** TLS comes from the following Ubuntu packages: libgnutls26, libgnutls-dev. I would appreciate any suggestion on how to investigate further the problem. Could it be a gnutls library version incompatibility? A bug in FS? In the ubuntu gnutls packages? Or simply an error in the configuration? Thanks for you help! Fede

4 4

TLS Audiocodes
by Szasz Szabolcs 26 Dec '13

26 Dec '13

Hi, Did anybody set up TLS between Freeswitch and Audiodes MP11X ? I got to work TLS between freeswitch and a softphone (phonerlite), but I have problem with Audiocodes during the TLS authentication. I've loaded the certification but it still doesn't work. Can I debug the tls in freeswitch? Please help me. Thank you in advance. Szasz Szabolcs

3 3

Gateway Registration Issues
by Aloysius Lloyd 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

Hi All, I am trying to connect IRISTEL ( CLEC ) in Canada and FreeSWITCH. I have the following gateway configuration <include> <gateway name="wwc_test"> <param name="auth-username" value="username"/> <param name="username" value="14161231234" /> <param name="password" value="password" /> <param name="proxy" value="sbc1.iristel.net" /> <param name="realm" value="iristel.net" /> <param name="expire-seconds" value="120"/> <param name="register" value="true"/> <param name="retry-seconds" value="30"/> <param name="ping" value="25"/> </gateway> </include> The above configuration is not working. I have the following error in cli Error. *2010-05-13 08:34:15.987465 [ERR] sofia_reg.c:1501 14161231234 Registration Failed with status Conflict [409]. failure #1* ==== Also carrier saying there is conflict in the contact field.Here is how they receive now. *Contact: <sip:gw+test_iristel@10.20.30.1:5080 ;transport=udp;gw=test_iristel>.* But the contact field should be like below Contact: <14161231234@10.20.30.1:5080; Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. Lloyd

5 6

FreeSWITCH not sending P-Asserted-Identity
by Vik Killa 29 Nov '13

29 Nov '13

I cannot get FS to send the P-Asserted-Identity header instead it always sends the P-Preferred-Identity header. According to http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#sip_cid_type I must set the privacy flag in order for P-Asserted-Identity to be used, so here is my dialplan entry and the SIP INVITE that is sent: <extension name="outbound"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(\d{10})$"> <action application="lcr" data="$1"/> <action application="set" data="effective_caller_id_name=${outbound_caller_id_name}"/> <action application="set" data="effective_caller_id_number=${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> <action application="set" data="privacy=yes"/> <action application="privacy" data="yes"/> <action application="set" data="sip_h_Privacy=id"/> <action application="bridge" data="{sip_cid_type=pid,origination_privacy=hide_namehide_number}${lcr_auto_route}"/> </condition> </extension> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE sip:+17165555555@YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 72.43.207.154;rport;branch=z9hG4bKK0pepF2H0atSp Max-Forwards: 68 From: "1000" <sip:7165551001@XX.XX.XX.XX>;tag=8U2rQ1pmXXaDQ To: <sip:+17165555555@YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY:5060> Call-ID: de66ec94-12f5-1230-cbb1-5e6ae73de10d CSeq: 27864844 INVITE Contact: <sip:mod_sofia@XX.XX.XX.XX:5060> User-Agent: FSwitch Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, presence, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Privacy: id Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 209 X-FS-Support: update_display,send_info P-Preferred-Identity: "1000" <sip:7165551001@XX.XX.XX.XX> v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1336383832 1336383833 IN IP4 XX.XX.XX.XX s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 XX.XX.XX.XX t=0 0 m=audio 17984 RTP/AVP 0 9 8 3 101 13 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20

6 11

blind transfer back to caller on failure
by Tiago Sampaio 11 Nov '13

11 Nov '13

Hi all. I'm wondering if is possible to return the call if no answer or user busy? i tryed this: <context name="INTERNAL"> <extension name="INTER_RAMAL"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(\d{4})$"> <action application="set" data="continue_on_fail=true" /> <action application="bridge" data="[originate_timeout=10]user/$1" /> </condition> </extension> <extension name="BLIND_TRANSFER"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^blind_transfer$"> <action application="answer"/> <action application="read" data="3 4 'tone_stream://%(10000,0,350,440)' digits 5000 #"/> <action application="set" data="continue_on_fail=true" /> <action application="execute_extension" data="is_transfer XML INTERNAL" />  <action application="bridge" data="user/${caller_id_number}" /> <action application="hangup" /> </condition> </extension> <extension name="is_transfer"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^is_transfer$"/> <condition field="${digits}" expression="^(\d+)$"> <action application="set" data="continue_on_fail=true" /> <action application="transfer" data="-bleg ${digits} XML INTERNAL"/> <anti-action application="eval" data="cancel transfer"/> </condition> </extension> </context> Example: User A call user B, user B answer and do blind transfer to user C. User B hangup when call blind transfer and C rings 30 seconds and then transfer again to B before hangup A... Now if i do blind transfer and no answer or user busy, freeswitch hangup all sides...

5 6

FS with SSL/TLS issues!
by mehroz 10 Nov '13

10 Nov '13

Hi, it seems like i am unable to get it done. Here is what i have done 1. created CA (Root) certificates: ./gentls_cert setup -cn pbx.freeswitch.org -alt DNS:pbx.freeswitch.org -org freeswitch.org 2. created Server Certificate: ./gentls_cert create_server -cn pbx.freeswitch.org -alt DNS:pbx.freeswitch.org -org freeswitch.org *I replaced pbx.freeswitch.org and freeswitch.org with my FS IP address in which i am listening.* 3. Enabled /internal_ssl_enable=true/ and/ ip_tls_version=tlsv1/ in vars.xml . 4. When i try to Register 3CX on TLS over port 5061, all i see is : tport_tls.c:869 tls_connect() tls_connect(0x7fbd94e7a5e0): events NEGOTIATING tport_tls.c:869 tls_connect() tls_connect(0x7fbd94e7a5e0): events NEGOTIATING tport_tls.c:958 tls_connect() tls_connect(0x7fbd94e7a5e0): TLS setup failed (error:00000001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)) tport.c:2084 tport_close() tport_close(0x7fbd94e7a5e0): tls/59.103.76.82:56863/sips tport.c:2730 tport_wakeup_pri() tport_wakeup_pri(0x7fbd94005090): events IN tport.c:869 tport_alloc_secondary() tport_alloc_secondary(0x7fbd94005090): new secondary tport 0x7fbd94f53c70 tport_type_tls.c:603 tport_tls_accept() tport_tls_accept(0x7fbd94f53c70): new connection from tls/59.103.76.82:56864/sips. PLease help!! -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/FS-with-SSL-TLS-issues-tp7587… Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

3 2

Is it necessary to call hangup....
by Moiz Chinoy 07 Nov '13

07 Nov '13

Hello, Is it necessary to call hangup in dialplan after say playing a file through playback application. -- Regards, Moiz Chinoy.

5 4

enable-100rel question
by Mike Burlingame 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

I was looking to turn on 100rel however based on the below info from the wiki I am not sure I want to run the risk of it crashing FS is this information still accurate? >From http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia_Configuration_Files enable-100rel This enable support for 100rel (100% reliability - PRACK message as defined in RFC3262) This fixes a problem with SIP where provisional messages like "180 Ringing" are not ACK'd and therefore could be dropped over a poor connection without retransmission. *2009-07-08:* Enabling this may cause FreeSWITCH to crash, see FSCORE-392. <param name="enable-100rel" value="true"/>

7 11