February 2011 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

Need help with CDR setup and call routing patterns
by Hareem Haque 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

Thank you very much for helping me out with the initial switch setup. I really appreciate it. However, I am stuck with the cdr and call routing patterns setup. A. I have attached my cdr_csv file and its cdr log file. As you may see in the conf xml that i have 22 items that i need posted onto my cdr logs. However, the csv file only shows 15 items. How can i make this work B. I have setup a few sip trunks. Now how do i set them up so that if i dial 01192 that call goes to gateway A and if i dial 1XXX then that call goes to gateway B Many thanks for all the help. I really appreciate it Best Regards Hareem. Haque

2 2

Any experience with DTMF from FreeSwitch to Sonus with Vega ATAs?
by Yehavi Bourvine 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

Hello, Anyone has an experience with the above configuration? All sides are marked as RFC-2833 and the Sonus recognises most of the DTMF's twice. The Vega sends both RFC-2833 events and about 60msec of the DTMF tone (according to Vega's engineers it takes it about 60 msec to detect the DTMF tones). According to the RFC this is acceptable. The service provider I am working with says that it shouldn't be like that. Before I waste time in wars, has anybody had this issue and knows whether it is a matter of configuration at the Sonus side? Thanks! __Yehavi:

3 5

Codec negotiation, again
by Serge Yuriev 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

Hello, A offers g729, g711a, g711u FS allows all of them B offers g711a, g711u Call fails with INCOMPATIBLE DESTINATION. Cant understand why FS offers only ONE codec (g729) to B - wiki says it should offer ordered LIST of.. GIT few days old, default config -- wbr, Serge

2 1

How to reread GW config?
by Serge Yuriev 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

Hello, I have changed few parameters on gw xml. reloadxml - no success sofia profile external rescan - no success sofia profile external register <gw> - no success sofia profile external restart - made things work I think it's too hard to restart profile for committing configs.. I'm doing something wrong? -- wbr, Serge

3 2

Mod_callcenter and Multi-Tenancy
by lloyd thomas 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

Hi, Can mod_callcenter be used in a multi-tenancy enviroment and with mod_xml_curl? Can you clarify what the following line means (Whether Multi-Tenancy or Multiple FS servers)?

1 0

local-network-acl parameter
by Dmitry Bely 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

Can you explain what objects is associated with this ACL? What does it allow or deny? http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Acl is silent on that. - Dmitry Bely

1 0

Strange warning in ftmod_sangoma_isdn
by Mariusz Kołodziejczyk 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

Hi, I have sometimes strange warning in module ftmod_sangoma_isdn .... 2011-02-20 11:31:35.190942 [WARNING] ftmod_wanpipe.c:946 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from sangoma device: No buffer space available (-65) 2011-02-20 11:31:35.190942 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:3756 [s1c31][1:16] raw I/O read filed 2011-02-20 11:31:35.190942 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:386 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from channel 2011-02-20 11:31:36.002943 [WARNING] ftmod_wanpipe.c:946 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from sangoma device: No buffer space available (-65) 2011-02-20 11:31:36.002943 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:3756 [s1c31][1:16] raw I/O read filed 2011-02-20 11:31:36.002943 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:386 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from channel 2011-02-20 11:31:36.390942 [WARNING] ftmod_wanpipe.c:946 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from sangoma device: No buffer space available (-65) 2011-02-20 11:31:36.390942 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:3756 [s1c31][1:16] raw I/O read filed 2011-02-20 11:31:36.390942 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:386 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from channel 2011-02-20 11:31:36.998941 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:688 [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: T200 expired N200 times(15): T200 Timeout(260) 2011-02-20 11:31:36.998941 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:688 [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: SABME reset started(17): SABME tx to initate link reset(264) 2011-02-20 11:31:37.002947 [WARNING] ftmod_wanpipe.c:946 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from sangoma device: No buffer space available (-65) 2011-02-20 11:31:37.002947 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:3756 [s1c31][1:16] raw I/O read filed 2011-02-20 11:31:37.002947 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:386 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from channel 2011-02-20 11:31:38.002947 [WARNING] ftmod_wanpipe.c:946 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from sangoma device: No buffer space available (-65) 2011-02-20 11:31:38.002947 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:3756 [s1c31][1:16] raw I/O read filed 2011-02-20 11:31:38.002947 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:386 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from channel 2011-02-20 11:31:39.002947 [WARNING] ftmod_wanpipe.c:946 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from sangoma device: No buffer space available (-65) 2011-02-20 11:31:39.002947 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:3756 [s1c31][1:16] raw I/O read filed 2011-02-20 11:31:39.002947 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:386 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from channel 2011-02-20 11:31:40.002947 [WARNING] ftmod_wanpipe.c:946 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from sangoma device: No buffer space available (-65) 2011-02-20 11:31:40.002947 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:3756 [s1c31][1:16] raw I/O read filed 2011-02-20 11:31:40.002947 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn.c:386 [s1c31][1:16] Failed to read from channel 2011-02-20 11:31:40.998941 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:688 [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: T200 expired N200 times(15): T200 Timeout(260) 2011-02-20 11:31:40.998941 [INFO] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:688 [SNGISDN Q921] wp1: Protocol: Data Link connection DN(4): Disconnect initiated(263) .... this series of warning appearances almost every half hour, sometimes as single warning. this is'nt related to any monitoring params in system (for example 'vmstat 1' shows nothing special in logs just before i get this warning message, during and a bit after, for warning above vmstat shows (i added time stamp to the end every each rows): procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 0 4631820 167932 1087348 0 0 0 0 100 2697 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:30 0 0 0 4631944 167932 1087348 0 0 0 0 100 2693 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:31 0 0 0 4631820 167932 1087348 0 0 0 0 100 2687 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:32 0 0 0 4631944 167932 1087348 0 0 0 72 121 2711 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:33 0 0 0 4631944 167932 1087348 0 0 0 0 104 2713 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:34 0 0 0 4631944 167932 1087352 0 0 0 0 104 2703 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:35 0 0 0 4631944 167932 1087352 0 0 0 0 104 2716 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:36 0 0 0 4631944 167932 1087352 0 0 0 152 137 2773 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:37 0 0 0 4631944 167932 1087356 0 0 0 0 107 2708 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:38 0 0 0 4631820 167932 1087356 0 0 0 0 104 2700 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:39 0 0 0 4631820 167932 1087360 0 0 0 0 104 2701 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:40 0 0 0 4631820 167932 1087360 0 0 0 0 104 2719 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:41 0 0 0 4631820 167932 1087360 0 0 0 156 124 2736 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:42 0 0 0 4631696 167932 1087360 0 0 0 8 109 2697 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:43 0 0 0 4631696 167932 1087360 0 0 0 0 103 2695 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:44 0 0 0 4631696 167932 1087360 0 0 0 0 101 2684 0 0 100 0 02-20-2011 11:31:45 When i've tested system i can make outgoing and incoming calls without any problem (max 3 calls simultaneously with different configuration, but i'm affraid if i use this in production environment (about 30-50 calls via isdn) this warning may cause addiction problems. I have installed: freeswitch : FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-a3b18e5 2011-02-19 16-47-19 +0100) linux (Debian) : Linux PBX 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Sep 16 15:56:38 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux wanrouter: WANPIPE Release: 3.5.18 libsng_isdn : libsng_isdn-7.3.0.x86_64 sangoma card: A102DE Is anybody have the same warning ? Thanks

1 0

destination number variable
by Serge Yuriev 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

Hello In INFO app after call i see (shortened for readability) 2011-02-09 00:20:00.824547 [INFO] mod_dptools.c:1202 CHANNEL_DATA: Caller-Direction: [inbound] Caller-Username: [nevian] Caller-Dialplan: [XML] Caller-Caller-ID-Name: [Serge S. Yuriev] Caller-Caller-ID-Number: [nevian] Caller-Callee-ID-Name: [Outbound Call] Caller-Callee-ID-Number: [79645835822(a)81.16.114.33] Caller-Network-Addr: [109.173.67.229] Caller-ANI: [nevian] Caller-Destination-Number: [79645835822] variable_sip_from_display: [Serge S. Yuriev] variable_sip_full_from: ["Serge S. Yuriev" <sip:nevian@cranz.nevian.org>;tag=624579331] variable_sip_full_to: [<sip:79645835822@cranz.nevian.org>] variable_sip_req_user: [79645835822] variable_sip_req_uri: [79645835822(a)cranz.nevian.org] variable_sip_req_host: [cranz.nevian.org] variable_sip_to_user: [79645835822] variable_sip_to_uri: [79645835822(a)cranz.nevian.org] In mod_radius_cdr profile->destination_number returns it as 79645835822(a)81.16.114.33 Which field should I use to get only number? Termination via h323 if this matters -- wbr, Serge

2 2

RTP Proxy config and DTMF conversion problem
by Mac 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

Dear ALL, Thats my first post here. I am struggling for some time with DTMF issue. Let me introduce you my configuration. The main task is to configure RTP Proxy with full topology hiding - OPERATOR_1 ------- Freeswitch ------- OPERATOR_2 Here is a prt of my config: - sip profile. I have one new sip profile with two gateways (OPERATOR_1 and OPERATOR_2) <include> <gateway name="OP1"> <param name="username" value="X1.Y1.V1.Z1"/> <param name="password" value="09321234"/> <param name="proxy" value="X1.Y1.V1.Z1"/> <param name="from-domain" value="test.com"/> <param name="register" value="false"/> <param name="caller-id-in-from" value="true"/> <param name="extension" value="test"/> <param name="extension-in-contact" value="true"/> <param name="outbound-codec-prefs" value="$${outbound_codec_prefs}"/> <param name="disable-transcoding" value="true"/> <param name="inbound-late-negotiation" value="true"/> </gateway> </include> - dialplan <include> <context name="public"> <extension name="term"> <condition field="network_addr" expression="^(X1\.Y1\.V1\.Z1|X2\.Y2\.V1\.Z1)$" break="on-false"/> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^46(\d{9})$"> <action application="set" data="proxy_media=true"/> <action application="set" data="bypass_media=false"/> <action application="start_dtmf"/> <action application="bridge" data="sofia/gateway/OP1/$0"/> </condition> </extension> </context> </include> Everything is fine, but i have problem with DTMF conversion from RFC2833 to inband. Refering to http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Misc._Dialplan_Tools_start_dtmfand http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Proxy_Media i have done all the necessary things. vars.xml <X-PRE-PROCESS cmd="set" data="global_codec_prefs=PCMA,G.729,PCMU,GSM"/> <X-PRE-PROCESS cmd="set" data="outbound_codec_prefs=PCMA,G.729,PCMU,GSM"/> Placing <param name="dtmf-type" value="none"/> does not help anyway. Could sb point me where the problem is located? Thanks in advance, Mac

1 0

DTMF not working properly
by Aloysius Lloyd 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

Hi All, I have a DTMF problem in version FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.head (git-39ff78b 2011-02-18 20-16-11 -0600) Phone - Polycom 335 Connected to the FreeSWITCH. Dial out a External Number . Then dial a Extension on the Destination IVR ( Destination is not FreeSWITCH) ... most of the time FreeSWITCH not sending the correct digits. I can see from the Console only the First Digit Captured by FreeSWITCH not rest of the Digits this is happen randomly I try with different SIP Trunk from different provider.. Same behavior --- here is partial of DTMF first digit then no digits shows up on the CLI 2011-02-19 14:18:20.688643 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2294 Send start packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=160/160/2080 seq=54483 2011-02-19 14:18:20.708130 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=320/320/2080 seq=54484 2011-02-19 14:18:20.728688 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=480/480/2080 seq=54485 2011-02-19 14:18:20.748147 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=640/640/2080 seq=54486 2011-02-19 14:18:20.768727 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=800/800/2080 seq=54487 2011-02-19 14:18:20.788050 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=960/960/2080 seq=54488 2011-02-19 14:18:20.808506 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=1120/1120/2080 seq=54489 2011-02-19 14:18:20.828043 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=1280/1280/2080 seq=54490 2011-02-19 14:18:20.848501 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=1440/1440/2080 seq=54491 2011-02-19 14:18:20.867984 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=1600/1600/2080 seq=54492 2011-02-19 14:18:20.888589 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=1760/1760/2080 seq=54493 2011-02-19 14:18:20.908531 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send middle packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=1920/1920/2080 seq=54494 2011-02-19 14:18:20.927937 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send end packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=2080/2080/2080 seq=54495 2011-02-19 14:18:20.927937 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send end packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=2080/2080/2080 seq=54496 2011-02-19 14:18:20.927937 [DEBUG] switch_rtp.c:2230 Send end packet for [2] ts=1463986596 dur=2080/2080/2080 seq=54497 --- Please let me know how to fix this or is it a Bug? Thanks Lloyd

1 0