January 2011 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

Error in log with latest FreeTDM
by Stephen Wilde 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

I have tried to update to the latest git my Freeswitch but I have due to revert to the previous version because with latest one (96ac90adce931a3a28c768e102b863637c8ba98d, Jan 5 16:55:06 2011 + Sangoma ISDN library 7.0.0) I have many warning errors and some critical errors in the log. No problem with my previous version (715d250e171a94736b19019ac742f739899ad997, Dec 15 21:29:52 2010 + Sangoma ISDN library 6.0.0). Here an extraction of my log file: 2011-01-06 02:01:25.990974 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s23c22][23:22] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:25.994018 [CRIT] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:988 sng_isdn-> date: 01/06/2011 time: 02:01:25 2011-01-06 02:01:25.994018 [CRIT] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:988 sng_isdn-> mtss(posix): sw error: ent: 010 inst: 000 proc id: 001 file: /usr/src/libsng_trillium-build/libsng_isdn/trillium/in/in_bdy1.c line: 2144 errcode: 46909632820939 errcls: ERRCLS_DEBUG errval: 00001 errdesc: InUiIntConReq() Failed. 2011-01-06 02:01:25.994018 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:862 [s10c1][10:1] STATUS CONFIRM (call_state:0 channel-state:DIALING cause:100) (suId:1 suInstId:57 spInstId:0) 2011-01-06 02:01:31.068159 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s22c9][22:9] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:31.172106 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s22c9][22:9] Cannot indicate PROGRESS_MEDIA in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:37.465176 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s3c28][3:28] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:37.472130 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s3c28][3:28] Cannot indicate RINGING in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:43.705155 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s23c23][23:23] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:43.707124 [CRIT] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:988 sng_isdn-> date: 01/06/2011 time: 02:01:43 2011-01-06 02:01:43.707124 [CRIT] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:988 sng_isdn-> mtss(posix): sw error: ent: 010 inst: 000 proc id: 001 file: /usr/src/libsng_trillium-build/libsng_isdn/trillium/in/in_bdy1.c line: 2144 errcode: 46909632820939 errcls: ERRCLS_DEBUG errval: 00001 errdesc: InUiIntConReq() Failed. 2011-01-06 02:01:43.707124 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:862 [s5c1][5:1] STATUS CONFIRM (call_state:0 channel-state:DIALING cause:100) (suId:1 suInstId:61 spInstId:0) 2011-01-06 02:01:49.463158 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s16c14][16:14] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:49.470188 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s16c14][16:14] Cannot indicate RINGING in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:53.938264 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s1c1][1:1] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:53.944202 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s1c1][1:1] Cannot indicate RINGING in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:59.468295 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s8c3][8:3] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:01:59.476270 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s8c3][8:3] Cannot indicate RINGING in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:01.057245 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s1c2][1:2] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:01.083313 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s1c2][1:2] Cannot indicate PROGRESS_MEDIA in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:04.286328 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s20c24][20:24] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:14.525323 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s17c23][17:23] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:15.029458 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s17c23][17:23] Cannot indicate PROGRESS_MEDIA in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:19.789411 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s12c5][12:5] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:19.891438 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s12c5][12:5] Cannot indicate PROGRESS_MEDIA in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:23.764507 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s22c10][22:10] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:26.462538 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s19c24][19:24] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:29.171509 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s22c10][22:10] Cannot indicate PROGRESS_MEDIA in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:31.698471 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s23c24][23:24] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:31.724623 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s23c24][23:24] Cannot indicate PROGRESS_MEDIA in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:44.469700 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s6c21][6:21] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:44.476688 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s6c21][6:21] Cannot indicate RINGING in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:48.018716 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s20c25][20:25] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:48.046713 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s20c25][20:25] Cannot indicate PROGRESS_MEDIA in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:49.463708 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s8c4][8:4] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:54.462848 [WARNING] mod_freetdm.c:434 [s19c25][19:25] Why bother changing state from PROCEED to PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:54.468754 [CRIT] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:988 sng_isdn-> date: 01/06/2011 time: 02:02:54 2011-01-06 02:02:54.468754 [CRIT] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_rcv.c:988 sng_isdn-> mtss(posix): sw error: ent: 010 inst: 000 proc id: 001 file: /usr/src/libsng_trillium-build/libsng_isdn/trillium/in/in_bdy1.c line: 2144 errcode: 46909632820939 errcls: ERRCLS_DEBUG errval: 00001 errdesc: InUiIntConReq() Failed. 2011-01-06 02:02:54.468754 [WARNING] ftmod_sangoma_isdn_stack_hndl.c:862 [s10c1][10:1] STATUS CONFIRM (call_state:0 channel-state:DIALING cause:100) (suId:1 suInstId:81 spInstId:0) 2011-01-06 02:02:55.305075 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s8c4][8:4] Cannot indicate PROGRESS_MEDIA in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED 2011-01-06 02:02:57.785073 [WARNING] ftdm_io.c:2250 [s19c25][19:25] Cannot indicate PROGRESS_MEDIA in channel with indication PROCEED still pending in state PROCEED

5 5

mod_conference context
by deniro 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

in using conferencing software, how would I change or seperate context for voip call and phone call? Currently both use public context(dialplan/public.xml). I want phone dialing use a seperate context and provide pin number. --phone calling use a pin number, voip call not asking any pin. I am looking for some guidence thx

2 1

mod_conference pin
by Ayhan Koroglu 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hi All Using the web based conferencing software I am able to dial in (phone call) to conference using pin number. But the problem is sip client(voice conf) is also asking that same pin number. in dialplan confname@profile+[pin] or in profile <param name="pin" value="pin_number"> How should I set my dial plan so that only phone dialing asks the pin number. Thanks

2 1

Originate command freezes Grandstream phone
by Sébastien Frippiat 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hello. I already posted about this problem without much answers (http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2010-December/066132…) and I thought it was the time to ask again, with more informations. First, I posted several parts of my configuration (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/14936) as well as the full logs of my two tests (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/14937) I use two phones (26 & 27 are their sip id): - 26 = Grandstream GXP2000 - 27 = Snom M3 The first test freezes the Grandstream phone but the second one works fine. The only thing changing in these two tests is the direction of the origination. Note that everything is on the same internal network. 1) originate {{origination_caller_id_name='Test originate 1',origination_caller_id_number='27',originate_timeout=20,effective_caller_id_name='User1',effective_caller_id_number='26',allow_outside_calls=true,outside_calls_gateway=xxxxxxxxx}}sofia/internal/26% 27 2) originate {{origination_caller_id_name='Test originate 2',origination_caller_id_number='26',originate_timeout=20,effective_caller_id_name='User2',effective_caller_id_number='27',allow_outside_calls=true,outside_calls_gateway=xxxxxxxxx}}sofia/internal/27% 26 1) Grandstream GXP2000 -> Snom M3 => KO (Grandstream completely freezes with horrible sounds on the speaker) 2) Snom M3 -> Grandstream GXP2000 => OK (no phones/audio problems) It was previously working with a version from 2010/09/09 and when we updated to 2010/12/09 (git-e680c82 2010-12-09 08-59-06 -0600), it wasn't working anymore. Latest version doesn't solve the issue. Note that the caller name show on the phone is "Outbound call" in this case but the correct name is shown when directly calling from a phone to another one. Anybody can help ?

2 1

10s delay between dialing and the ringing on an internal call
by Sébastien Frippiat 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Hello. You can find some parts of my configuration here: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/14936 Most of the times, internal calls work fine but I recently encountered odd problems. When I pickup my phone and dial a number (an internal number, the other phone is on the same network, registered to the same freeswitch instance), it sometimes takes up to 10s between the moment I dial the number and the moment the other phone starts ringing. I included a full log of a call with the problem (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/14938) as well as the log of a call without the problem (http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/14939) Could the problem come from the "Rejected by acl "domains"" message" ? Anybody can help ?

4 5

inline string of commands rather than phrase: for greet-long ivr attribute
by Matthew Fong 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

I am wondering if it is possible to use an inline style string of commands like playback:play1.wav say:hello playback:play2.wav in the greet-long xml ivr attribute rather than having to create a phrase macro. If it is possible can I please get an example. thanks --matt

2 3

sofia status profile internal - Output in Table view
by Aloysius Lloyd 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Hi All, Is there any way to get the output from sofia status profile internal in a table view. Something like Asterisk "sip show peers" Thanks Lloyd

3 3

Get a CLUE an (ANSI C compiler targeting high level languages) LUA, JS, Perl, C, Java and Common Lisp
by EdPimentl 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

FYIhttp://cluecc.sourceforge.net/ Clue: an ANSI C compiler targeting high level languages *New! v0.5 released!* Now we support Java --- at about 40% of the speed of native code! What? Clue is an ANSI C compiler (C89, some C99) that targets high-level languages such as Lua, Javascript or Perl (and some low-level ones). It supports the entire C language, including pointer arithmetic, and can be used to run arbitrary pure-C programs. Clue currently supports the following targets: - Lua 5.1.3 - Javascript - Perl 5 - C - Java - Common Lisp Sincerely, -E

1 0

Register warnings and Errors
by Kilburn Abrahams 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Hi I upgraded to git-a90b4fe 2011-01-04 23-51-47 +0100. Getting this in the console when a REGISTER is recorded. I think I also upgraded sqlite a few days ago. Has anything changed to cause these warnings and errors. 2011-01-06 22:44:41.896726 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1216 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia profile 'internal' for [1000(a)192.168.1.230] from ip 192.168.1.111 2011-01-06 22:44:42.693350 [ERR] sofia_reg.c:1317 DELETE PRESENCE SQL: delete from sip_presence where sip_user='1000' and sip_host='192.168.1.230' and profile_name='internal' and open_closed='closed' Thanks Kilburn

2 1

no ringback tone
by Sam 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Hi All, happy new you to you ! using a sangoma card and when dialing a mobile number which is having ringback tune / caller tune ; but a plain ring is heard to the user dialing that mobile through the trunk. I am using below syntax to dial out:- <action application="bridge" data="{monitor_early_media_ring_total=3}freetdm/wp1/a/${destination_number}"/> Any suggestions. Regards Sam

3 12