- FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

SCTP on Windows/C++/C#/VB
by Jan Berger 24 May '10

24 May '10

Hi, I minor note in SCTP for those with special interests. The SCTP on Windows is working, thought the current performance is only ca 30,000 messages per sec on my old laptop. The driver performs stable under normal operations, but 100% CPU load over time will expose a snag that the author currently are working to sort out. I have tested on Windows XP Professional with an ordinary laptop. The stack failed to install on Windows Vista 32 bit. For all practical purposes the stack is sufficient for my development work, but I will not recommend using in production yet. I have not tested the alternative which is www.sctp.de , but would like to hear from anyone that has experience of this. If anyone is interested in this work let me know. Jan

1 0

Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_dptools/redirect and 300 Multiple Choices
by Carlos Romero 24 May '10

24 May '10

why choose a library that is hard to work with in the first place? it seems like sofia has many downsides... limited threads per sip-profile and now this On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Michael Collins <msc at freeswitch.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Carlos Romero <romerocarlos24 at gmail.com>wrote: > >> what do you mean that you don't have access to it? >> >> you have the code >> > > The SIP stack is supplied by Nokia. Open source or not, it is bad form to > muck with someone else's library without due cause. Like all robust SIP > stacks, Sofia is huge, deep, complex, and otherwise uninviting of those who > would waltz in and do whatever they wish. If you feel that it is even within > the realm of possibility then I recommend that you find the location in the > Sofia library where this takes place, make the appropriate changes, and > thoroughly test for regressions. Submit the patch to the Sofia devs who will > then evaluate it and see if it is worthy of inclusion. > > Or more simply put: "having the code" and "having access" are COMPLETELY > different concepts. > -MC > > >> >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Anthony Minessale >> <anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: >> > not without intervention from the sofia devs, >> > Sofia sip does that deep down and we don't have access to it. >> > even when we supply it as a one big string it renders it out depending >> on >> > those settings. >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Carlos Romero <romerocarlos24(a)gmail.com> wrote: > what do you mean that you don't have access to it? > > you have the code > > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Anthony Minessale > <anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: >> not without intervention from the sofia devs, >> Sofia sip does that deep down and we don't have access to it. >> even when we supply it as a one big string it renders it out depending on >> those settings. >> >

5 9

How do you set outbound from address in SIP header
by Bob Coleman 24 May '10

24 May '10

Hi, I am trying to set the sip from address for outbound calls, but cant seem to find the option. The below is from a sip trace, and shows it set to the defaults eg From: "FreeSWITCH" <sip:0000000000@10.12.78.1>;tag=pQ68N9mKc7rDK I have changed the vars.xml to set the above details but nothing happens, restarted just to make sure. Searched the other conf files to make sure there is not another place. Using an older binary 1.4 , is there any known issues regarding that. Thanks Bob

1 1

mod_managed session.recordFile() problem
by babak yakhchali 23 May '10

23 May '10

Hi all somebody save me plz! I'm using the code below to simply record messages: Session.Answer() ... if (Session.Ready()) { Session.Execute("sleep", "100"); Session.StreamFile(..., -1); Session.Execute("playback", "tone_stream://%(500,500,480,620)"); Session.RecordFile(..., 60000, 500, 5); } it's working on my pc with no problem but when I upload it to the server(which is much much much stronger than my pc) first 5 6 sec of message is not recorded thanks

1 0

Re: [Freeswitch-users] confirm 155a8a12b77a3382db745b073f0d8f6a37c95f5d
by Alejandro Duque Rueda 22 May '10

22 May '10

Hello, I am working with freeswitch on Open wrt. I have 2 modules that doesn't exists information in the wiki: mod_portaudio_stream and mod_alsa. Someone can tell me for what are those modules, and if someone have worked with them. Thank you

2 1

Conference command "relate", nospeak/nohear
by Peter Olsson 22 May '10

22 May '10

Hello everyone, I have a small question about the mod_conference relate command. What's the expected behaviour of "nohear"? Is it supposed to work as nospeak, but in the other direction? When running "conference xx relate member_x member_y nospeak", the audio from member_x to member_y is muted, but when using nohear I didn't notice any difference at all (I could still hear audio everywhere). Is it supposed to work the opposite way, so when using nospeak|nohear as parameter, the audio from x to y is muted, and also the other way around? /Peter

2 1

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Quick question on Originate through api
by Kristian Kielhofner 22 May '10

22 May '10

AFAIK the % let's Freeswitch know it's a local domain and doesn't need to do any DNS lookups, etc. While it was never really necessary to use % it made a lot sense for various reasons. -- Kristian Kielhofner http://blog.krisk.org ----- Original Message ----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org <freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org> To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Fri May 21 12:07:17 2010 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Quick question on Originate through api not necessary .... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Olsson" <peter.olsson(a)visionutveckling.se> To: <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Quick question on Originate through api For sofia/internal/ you should use a % as a separator I think, instead of @-sign. /Peter ________________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org] för Phillip Jones [pjintheusa(a)gmail.com] Skickat: den 21 maj 2010 17:41 Till: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] Quick question on Originate through api Hi there, In my mind - where 6775557767 is a registered user, the following two are the same: apiResult = fsApi.Execute("originate", string.Format("{{ignore_early_media=false,absolute_codec_string='PCMU',origination_caller_id_number=5556667776}}user/6775557767 ' apiResult = fsApi.Execute("originate", string.Format("{{ignore_early_media=false,absolute_codec_string='PCMU',origination_caller_id_number=5556667776}}sofia/internal/6775557767(a)121.763.76.76 ' i.e. user/ and sofia/internal are the same thing. However on my system the user/ works great but sofia/internal loops call back through in the public context. Can someone tell me the difference between these options? What am I missing? Thanks Phil !DSPAM:4bf6abb932934294689129! _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

4 4

CDRs for Gateways
by Code Ghar 22 May '10

22 May '10

Hi David I looked at what you suggested. Before your suggestion, in /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/autoload_configs/cdr_csv.conf file, I had the following lines   After your suggestion, I changed it to   and then did a reloadxml. Now all CDRs were created in /usr/local/freeswitch/log/cdr-csv/Master.csv and CDRs for inbound calls from unregistered sources (i.e. external gateways) were also created in this file. Thanks for your help. Code, I think you have a major issue or configuration error with your FS setup. FS, as any B2BUA, generates a CDR for any inbound leg, either from a registered user or from a non-registered gateway. It doesn't care where it comes from, it just does it. I can barely imagine a softswitch that would not write the CDR matching a call that was routed through it. The CDR for the outbound leg is optional. Can you confirm you are looking in Master.csv ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur. Le 21/05/2010 à 05:25, Code Ghar a écrit : > Using mod_cdr_csv, it is easy to create CDRs for registered users. > However, how can we get CDRs for external gateways? For example, > FreeSWITCH is configured to receive calls from one gateway and send > them out through another. In this scenario, when neither inbound nor > outbound gateway registers itself to FreeSWITCH, how can we generate > and store CDRs for inbound gateway? > > Similarly, let's say a SIP provider sends a call meant for a > registered user. For example, if a cell phone calls 6175550000, it > is routed through the telephone network to the SIP provider. This > provider routes the call to FreeSWITCH, which looks up in its dial > plan that this number should be routed to extension (or registered > user) 1000. There are no CDRs generated for either the SIP > provider's gateway or the registered user in this case. > > In both these scenarios, if a call is inbound to FreeSWITCH but has > not been generated by a registered user, mod_cdr_csv does not create > CDRs. I have even tried to set the following parameter in > cdr_csv.conf.xml but it didn't help. > > <param name="legs" value="ab"/> > > My question is this: can mod_cdr_csv generate CDRs for inbound calls > from sources other than registered users? If it can't, how can this > be achieved? > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org

2 1

mod_dptools/redirect and 300 Multiple Choices
by Carlos Romero 21 May '10

21 May '10

what do you mean that you don't have access to it? you have the code On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote: > not without intervention from the sofia devs, > Sofia sip does that deep down and we don't have access to it. > even when we supply it as a one big string it renders it out depending on > those settings. >

4 3

mobisents
by Jan Berger 21 May '10

21 May '10

Hi, Is anyone working on a FreeSWITCH RA for mobicents? I just realised that mobicents already have sccp, tcap, inap, camel, map + a few other things. They already have a Asterisk RA. Jan

1 0