November 2018 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

Audio delayed for about 3sec.
by 王聡 20 Dec '18

20 Dec '18

Hey all, Today I moved my freeswitch server from VM to cloud server, but I found there has an audio delay on both caller and receiver for about 3sec in each call during call test. Is there any idea for this audio delay? Regards.

7 13

One way audio case between FS and Chrome on WebRTC
by MARAND, Remi 12 Dec '18

12 Dec '18

Hello, I am trying to validate FS as a SIP to WebRTC Gateway in our lab environment. I started in middle October and have good result on it, but i cannot understand this One Way Audio trouble. I must thank the Freeswitch team and contributors for this very impressive work. FreeSWITCH Version 1.8.1-2-4f54cff36a~64bit (-2-4f54cff36a 64bit) On system: SMP Debian 4.9.110-3+deb9u6 (2018-10-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux Openssl version : OpenSSL 1.1.0f 25 May 2017 Chrome version: 69.0 (I tried with different version and with Firefox with the same trouble). The wss part is ok with sip.js and verto.js The Ice negotiation is ok, I use sometimes local networks and sometimes web, I have had to authorize networks in the candidate ACL and domain ACL (acl.conf.xml) The result is the same on both topology. DTLS negotiation is OK, and there is UDP streams between Chrome (or Firefox) and FS in both ways. There is no "audible" audio in the direction from FS to Chrome, the other direction is OK. The simplest test is to call the 5000 number from the Chrome client, I send you a paste bin and pcap trace for this call. Should you give me information element to progress on this, what is really mandatory in the sip_profile/internal.xml and external.xml files, and in directory/default/1000.xml for a WebRTC call ?? What should be the good options in fs_cli to see if the encryption of RTP packets is ok or not.. ? Do you think that I have to reinstall a Freeswitch from the current branch ? @IP for FS : 192.168.145.67 @IP for Chrome : 10.70.54.43 Link on the pastebin : https://pastebin.freeswitch.org/view/09a72087 I have a pcap on the same call that I can provide (3 Mb) if necessary.. Thank you for helping me !! Best regards. [Prosodie-signature]<http://www.prosodie.com/> Rémi Marand - Product Owner - Pod Connect. PROSODIE - Marketing & Produit Tél. : +33 (0)1.46.84.12.77 / 06.87.72.53.25 rmarand(a)prosodie.com<mailto:rmarand@prosodie.com> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

2 3

Replace User-Agent and Server headers
by Kevin Olbrich 12 Dec '18

12 Dec '18

Hi! How can I replace User-Agent and Server headers in freeswitch? This is some kind of hardening (why tell people which version I use if the don't need to know...). Sure, I use the latest releases but I would like to hide the version I use or that I use freeswitch at all. Kind regards Kevin

6 5

Mutli-lingual ivr
by Darcy Primrose 06 Dec '18

06 Dec '18

We are long time freeswitch users in an area of Canada where there is a strong english french mix. We have for some time be providing a multi-lingual experience for the extensions/users quite successfully but have not been able to get the ivr to switch to a second language. Has anyone had experience or success with this. We use en as our prime language code but when specific DIDs are dialed, we would like the IVR responses to be in french. First, is this possible in freeswitch and if so, does anyone have any hints on how to accomplish this. Thanks Darcy Primrose Voice2Net

2 6

Setup Verto in Local to Replace SIP
by Chhorm Chhatra 06 Dec '18

06 Dec '18

Hi, I am not sure if this approach is still being used these days, but I'd like to know if there is any guide out there to set up Verto in Local (No SSL certificates required). My use case is that we don't want to involve with the Internet yet we still want the call to be established via Verto rather than SIP since SIP is not supported by the latest version of Android out of the box. Any help would be appreciated. Best regards, Chhatra Chhorm

2 2

Get Active User
by Chhorm Chhatra 06 Dec '18

06 Dec '18

Hi, I'd like to know if there is any possible way to get all active users (users that are reachable and being to be bridged to). Any help would be appreciated. Best regards, Chhatra Chhorm

2 2

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Memory increase because of multiple instances of freeswitch
by David Villasmil 05 Dec '18

05 Dec '18

I've never seen this... Is it possible the process is being started multiple times? You _can_ run fs multiple times, but only the first would start properly as the rest would try to bind to a port already in use by the first process. There's a parameter on all profiles to shutdown if it can't start, try setting that and see what happens. You should also check your crontab... This is NOT normal FS behaviour, as far as i know. Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337 ᐧ On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:48 PM António Silva via FreeSWITCH-users < freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "António Silva" <asilva(a)wirelessmundi.com> > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:53:03 +0100 > Subject: Re: Memory increase because of multiple instances of freeswitch > Forget to put my unit configuration: > > [Service] > ; service > Type=forking > PIDFile=/run/freeswitch/freeswitch.pid > ExecStart=/usr/bin/freeswitch -ncwait -nonat -scripts /scripts/fs > TimeoutSec=300s > Restart=on-failure > RestartSec=500ms > ; exec > User=root > Group=daemon > LimitCORE=infinity > LimitNOFILE=100000 > LimitNPROC=60000 > LimitSTACK=250000 > LimitRTPRIO=infinity > LimitRTTIME=infinity > IOSchedulingClass=realtime > IOSchedulingPriority=2 > CPUSchedulingPolicy=rr > CPUSchedulingPriority=89 > UMask=0007 > > > > On 08/11/2018 17:11, António Silva wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I notice a strange behaviour on machine due to increase of memory, > > when i went to see that was the process consuming the memory i notice > > that freeswitch have multiple process running: > > > > root 2543 90.4 4.8 2178716 1587484 ? S<sl Sep27 36619:46 > > /usr/bin/freeswitch -ncwait -nonat -scripts /opt/commsmundi/scripts/fs > > root 7858 0.0 5.0 2289392 1649484 ? SN Oct19 0:00 \_ > > /usr/bin/freeswitch -ncwait -nonat -scripts /opt/commsmundi/scripts/fs > > root 30626 0.0 4.4 2172632 1464684 ? SN Oct23 0:00 \_ > > /usr/bin/freeswitch -ncwait -nonat -scripts /opt/commsmundi/scripts/fs > > root 4505 0.0 4.9 2336544 1621768 ? SN 10:43 0:00 \_ > > /usr/bin/freeswitch -ncwait -nonat -scripts /opt/commsmundi/scripts/fs > > root 22557 0.0 4.9 2336548 1636604 ? SN 11:02 0:00 \_ > > /usr/bin/freeswitch -ncwait -nonat -scripts /opt/commsmundi/scripts/fs > > > > > > and today: > > > > root 21823 93.9 4.8 2154128 1581064 ? S<sl Oct26 17781:45 > > /usr/bin/freeswitch -ncwait -nonat -scripts /opt/commsmundi/scripts/fs > > root 18417 0.0 4.9 2247264 1610108 ? SN 11:09 0:00 \_ > > /usr/bin/freeswitch -ncwait -nonat -scripts /opt/commsmundi/scripts/fs > > > > > > what could be the cause of this? anyone experience the same? > > > > As for the service everything is running ok, is just that the memory > > keeps increasing.. i restart freewitch when i start to reach my memory > > limit. > > > > > > I'm running fs 1.8.2 on debian jessie. > > > > > -- > Saludos / Regards / Cumprimentos > António Silva > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "António Silva via FreeSWITCH-users" < > freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 11:48:33 -0800 (PST) > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Memory increase because of multiple > instances of freeswitch > _________________________________________________________________________ > Professional FreeSWITCH Services > sales(a)freeswitch.com > https://freeswitch.com > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > https://freeswitch.com/oss > https://freeswitch.org/confluence > https://cluecon.com > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > https://freeswitch.com

3 6

early media + sip trunk
by Tiago Galvão Gomes de Souza 03 Dec '18

03 Dec '18

Hello friends, I would like to know how is the better way to block outbound calls with early media and sip trunk, I have a system for callcenter and I have a big problem with calls in voicemail entering to agents , I tried to use monitor_early_media_fail with ignore_early_media but I didn't have a sucessfull, it is possible to use this function to block it? How can i do it? My wish is to stop the call when i knew that is a voicemail call. -- Atenciosamente, Tiago Galvão Gomes de Souza.

3 6

Effective_Caller_ID_Name set to Dialed name for internal Ext.
by Moshe Rosenberg 03 Dec '18

03 Dec '18

so for example we have 2 users Sam, 101 Susan , 102 now when Sam (101) dials 102 he will see on his phone display screen "calling 102" in many other system that i worked with when a user dials an internal call the screen will display "Susan 102" any ideas or hint on how to go about it with Freeswitch -- Moshe Rosenberg Tel. 718 633 1444 Cel. 347 678 3993 www.data <http://www.dataday.consulting/>phone.cloud Moshe(a)dataphone.cloud -- Moshe Rosenberg Tel. 718 633 1444 Cel. 347 678 3993 www.data <http://www.dataday.consulting/>phone.cloud Moshe(a)dataphone.cloud

4 6

Change Gateway Context to receive calls
by Caio Assis 03 Dec '18

03 Dec '18

Hello! I have to configure a Gateway to receive calls from it and process it correctly. The problem is that I haven't found a way to change the context, and, when I receive a call from a Peer with the same IP as the Gateway, FreeSwitch ignores the authentication from the Peer and checks if the IP is allowed in ACL domains. Call comes from authenticated Peer 1000 though context CUSTOM -> OK I have to configure a Gateway which has the same IP as the Peer 1000, so I allow it in ACL. Then, all calls from Peer 1000 come through PUBLIC context. Thanks.

2 1