November 2017 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

Received an unsupported RTCP packet version 3
by Mikhail Demekhov 16 Jan '18

16 Jan '18

Hello! I have FreeSWITCH Version 1.6.12. After connecting partner FS-1.7 I had a lot of warning: [WARNING] switch_rtp.c:6207 Received an unsupported RTCP packet version 3 How to fix it? -- Regards, Mikhail Demekhov

2 1

webrtc with ecdsa
by GM phy 05 Jan '18

05 Jan '18

Hello, did anybody get webrtc working with a ECDSA signed cert? I have fs 1.6.19 compiled with openssl 1.0.2g and wss.pem file is -----BEGIN EC PARAMETERS----- BggqhkjOPQMBBw== -----END EC PARAMETERS----- -----BEGIN EC PRIVATE KEY----- MHcCAQEEIPNZ4YUGKQ2cySfnEp1RSOSDp9MTQ21xyISpBmBPRN1/oAoGCCqGSM49 AwEHoUQDQgAEnxYcss4/4yCzBl85psRqTLeQ0FnXqsoDCC/2lKMTsrS7mlPgCo7m +A4huOY2MtbwXtBdg2kqjYbcrkAk5zwa6Q== -----END EC PRIVATE KEY----- -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIIGGTCCBQGgAwIBAgIMAPaMiX8YXElRs/bJMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMEwxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAkJFMRkwFwYDVQQKExBHbG9iYWxTaWduIG52LXNhMSIwIAYDVQQDExlB bHBoYVNTTCBDQSAtIFNIQTI1NiAtIEcyMB4XDTE3MTAxNzEzNDY1MVoXDTE4MTAx ODEzNDY1MVowQTEhMB8GA1UECxMYRG9tYWluIENvbnRyb2wgVmFsaWRhdGVkMRww GgYDVQQDDBMqLmxhY29udGluZW50YWwuY29tMFkwEwYHKoZIzj0CAQYIKoZIzj0D AQcDQgAEnxYcss4/4yCzBl85psRqTLeQ0FnXqsoDCC/2lKMTsrS7mlPgCo7m+A4h uOY2MtbwXtBdg2kqjYbcrkAk5zwa6aOCA88wggPLMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIDiDCB iQYIKwYBBQUHAQEEfTB7MEIGCCsGAQUFBzAChjZodHRwOi8vc2VjdXJlMi5hbHBo .... when we try to connect (we are using sipjs and tried from chrome and firefox last versions) we get a handshake failure. any lead or help will be appreciated, thanks in advance.

3 2

Get digits through play_and_detect_speech
by Aqs Younas 26 Dec '17

26 Dec '17

Greeting list, I am unable to find a way to get digits through play_and_detect_speech. I have tried lua callback function but it seems to work only for stream. Searching archive and google, gives no result. Could someone please give me some pointers? Best Regards, <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

2 2

[OT] baresip
by Alfred E. Heggestad 23 Dec '17

23 Dec '17

Hi, My apologies for this off-topic post, but I hope that this can be of interest to the nice Freeswitch community. We have released a new version of Baresip which is a open source SIP client that is compatible with Freeswitch. you can find the source code here: https://github.com/alfredh/baresip/releases/tag/v0.5.5 We are doing regular interop-testing with Freeswitch, mainly SIP and RTP related features. From the Baresip project we send the best greetings to the nice people on this list :) /alfred

3 2

Question on integrating with google speech api
by Karanath sachidanandan, Sanooj 07 Dec '17

07 Dec '17

Hi Freeswitch users, We are trying to integrate Freeswitch to google speech api , is there a way to get a handle of audio stream in javascript ? Regards Sanooj ________________________________ The information in this Internet Email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this Email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this Email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing The Home Depot terms of business or client engagement letter. The Home Depot disclaims all responsibility and liability for the accuracy and content of this attachment and for any damages or losses arising from any inaccuracies, errors, viruses, e.g., worms, trojan horses, etc., or other items of a destructive nature, which may be contained in this attachment and shall not be liable for direct, indirect, consequential or special damages in connection with this e-mail message or its attachment.

3 4

mod_spandsp on Windows as modem with com0com - port in use
by NYCPhoneService 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

I guess I'm missing something with this setup: Freeswitch-1.6.19 built from source on Win 8.1, com0com 3.0 signed, pair on COM6 and COM7 the and soft modem for fax server is on COM7 I had to set number of modems to 6 in config, otherwise I was just getting no modems available. Mod_spandsp sees the port: 2017-11-29 23:43:52.885349 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_modem.c:371 Modem COM6 [INIT] - Changing state to INIT 2017-11-29 23:43:52.885349 [INFO] mod_spandsp_modem.c:373 Modem [COM6]->[(null)] Ready but when I bridge to modem/6/123 I get: 2017-11-29 23:44:49.203916 [ERR] mod_spandsp_modem.c:1390 Modem COM6 In Use! 2017-11-29 23:44:49.203916 [ERR] mod_spandsp_modem.c:1398 No Modems Available! 971de557-adb4-4a19-9e7d-ab4f13b954be 2017-11-29 23:44:49.203916 [ERR] mod_spandsp_modem.c:862 Cannot find a modem. The same com0com setup works with an old T38Modem with no issues. Any suggestions are really appreciated Dennis

3 4

ACL: auth_calls + apply-inbound-acl/auth-acl
by Anatoli 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Hi all, I'm trying to understand FreeSWITCH's ACL concepts, but I find the documentation not clear with respect to a combined effect of various *acl* params with auth-calls. Could you please provide your comments on the following? The documentation (https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/ACL) says: /auth-calls: Can be set to true/false forcing users to authenticate or no on the profile. Only allow users from a specific cidr to register/make calls.// / First of all, it's not clear what's the default value of the auth-calls param. If it's not explicitly defined, is it true or false? (BTW, same happens with a lot of other params, i.e. no default value specified in the docs, and for some params I couldn't even find the default values in the sources.) Then, if auth-calls is set to true, will it ignore all *acl* params and always force auth? Or will it force auth only for those not specified in the *acl* params (e.g. IPs in apply-inbound-acl won't be forced to auth, all others will be). Similar doubt with the false value: will it always ignore auth or will it ignore auth for the IPs in the *acl* params and still require it for everything else? Then the documentation specifies: /apply-inbound-acl: Allow users to make calls from a particular cidr without authenticating. Phones having IPs within these ACLs will be able to perform calls (apply-inbound-acl) or register (apply-register-acl) without having to provide a password (i.e. without getting a "401 Unauthorized" challenge message).// / So if I understand it correctly, if I want a particular host (e.g. my SIP trunk provider) to make inbound calls without auth, but everyone else to be rejected with Unauthorized, I should specify in the corresponding sip profile: <param name="apply-inbound-acl" value="1.2.3.4/32"/> The documentation adds: /The ACL behavior is modified by auth-calls, accept-blind-reg, and accept-blind-auth./ So what should be the value for auth-calls in this case? How would it modify the behavior of apply-inbound-acl (i.e. apply-inbound-acl + auth-calls=false and apply-inbound-acl + auth-calls=true)? Then, the documentation says: /auth-calls: Users in the directory can have "auth-acl" parameters applied to them so as to restrict users access to a predefined ACL or a CIDR. Note: this will require "auth-calls" to be set to true in your sip (sofia) profile.// / So, if I want to restrict my internal users to be able to register (providing their passwords) only from a specific range and be rejected with Unauthorized for other IPs or if not providing auth, should I configure the profile this way? <param name="auth-calls" value="true"/> <param name="auth-acl" value="1.2.3.0/24"/> My doubt here is: would auth-acl add an additional level of restriction without altering the default behavior of auth-calls (that is to request auth from everyone) or would it somehow relax the default behavior for some cases? Thanks, Anatoli

2 5

Turning off ring back
by Jerry Chinn 05 Dec '17

05 Dec '17

Good Day. FreeSwitch is presenting ring back to calling party by default. Is there a way to shut that feature off? Jerry Chinn Telecom VoIP Specialist NAVIS More Performance. More Profit. tel 541-330-3562 www.TheNavisWay.com<http://www.thenavisway.com/> Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/theNAVISway/> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/NAVISway> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/navisway> | Blog<https://www.thenavisway.com/blog>

2 1

G729 and windows
by Gregor Nanger 05 Dec '17

05 Dec '17

Hi, I'm using Fs on Windows and would like to buy licenses for g729 transoding. But is this possible to use this functionality on Windows? Best regards, Gregor -- Gregor Nanger *CTO* t./f.: 00386 (0) 7 6000 308/309 • m:. 00386 (0)41 756485 • Infomedia d.o.o. • Jerebova 3, Novo mesto, Slovenia • www.infomedia.si

6 8

WebSocket behind NGINX
by Anton 04 Dec '17

04 Dec '17

Hello All, I have to proxy all websocket requests though a nginx server. Right now I am using next configuration: map $http_upgrade $connection_upgrade { default upgrade; '' close; } server { listen 443; server_name wss.somedomain.com.ua; ssl on; ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/cert.pem; ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/private.key; location / { proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:5066; proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade; proxy_read_timeout 86400s; } access_log /var/log/nginx/wss_access; error_log /var/log/nginx/wss_error debug; } I dumped traffic from nginx and found out that "switching protocol" phrase was successful but INVITE message from my browser in pending state. Maybe FreeSWITCH wants real IP not loopback? Who have faced with similar problem? BR, Anton

4 5