September 2015 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

Re: [Freeswitch-users] OneWay audio after hold->unhold
by Prashanth Devarajappa 08 Sep '15

08 Sep '15

Thanks for your message. >> Best Route to do this is via session Manager as this is the supported method. First create a trunk link between Session manager and Freeswitch This is how we have setup our environment and got this far. Prashanth From: kaleem rehman [mailto:k4kaleem@gmail.com] Sent: 08 September 2015 10:46 To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users Digest, Vol 111, Issue 82 Hi Prashanth / Bob, Avaya CM supports sip but this is mainly used for Aura VM, Experience portal and SM and more of Avaya only devices, direct conenctions to Asterisk , FS & 3CX work but I always experienced issues due to Avaya SIP Limitations and also officially this is not supported Best Route to do this is via session Manager as this is the supported method. First create a trunk link between Session manager and Freeswitch, then register extension directly to SM and make calls between from this extension and Freeswitch, once everything is working then create a trunk between CM & SM, or use existing and setup digit routing on SM and CM. if you have any issues setting up SM and its entities then let me know. this way will be best and far most easy one. thanks, kaleem On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:54 AM, <freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org>> wrote: Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org> You can reach the person managing the list at freeswitch-users-owner(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users-owner@lists.freeswitch.org> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: OneWay audio after hold->unhold (Bote Man) 2. Re: Compiling under SmartOS (Stanislav Sinyagin) 3. Re: OneWay audio after hold->unhold (Prashanth Devarajappa) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bote Man <bote_radio(a)botecomm.com<mailto:bote_radio@botecomm.com>> To: "'FreeSWITCH Users Help'" <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>> Cc: Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 18:03:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] OneWay audio after hold->unhold Actually, yes I need all of the settings on the Avaya side. I am not using encryption and I never could get the Avaya CS1000M to talk to the FreeSWITCH installation. I think the closest I could get was the signaling would allow the call to be answered, but I got no audio to pass either direction. I think the Avaya puts information in unexpected elements of the SIP message and I had no more time to troubleshoot it because it was not my primary task. There must be some small setting that I am missing and I would love to find the missing piece of the puzzle. Thanks! Bote From: Prashanth Devarajappa Sent: Monday, 07 September, 2015 09:47 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] OneWay audio after hold->unhold Avaya PBX Version Control • Media encryption over IP:Y • Session Manager Element Manager 6.3 • System Manager Release 6.3.5 • Communication System Management 6.3.10 In IP-Network-region : • Codec set matches group for encryption • Intra-region IP-IP Direct Audio: yes • Inter-region IP-IP Direct Audio: yes In CM, signaling-group of type: SIP • Transport Method: TLS Let me know if you need further Avaya config details. FreeSwitch : Its standard FS with custom (code/config) changes to enable • Support for RFC 5939 : Capability Negotiation • Support for UNENCRYPTED_SRTCP • Support IP Shuffling with in ACK…… to be done ☺ Prashanth From: Bote Man [mailto:bote_radio@botecomm.com] Sent: 05 September 2015 04:50 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] OneWay audio after hold->unhold We would be VERY appreciative if you could provide the configurations on the Avaya and FreeSWITCH that allow them to talk to each other. In my experience Avaya does not play well with others, and I have tried and given up. Thank you in advance! Bote On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Prashanth Devarajappa <Prashanth.Devarajappa(a)enghouse.com<mailto:Prashanth.Devarajappa@enghouse.com>> wrote: Hello, I am connecting to Avaya switch using SIP trunk interface from FS with TLS & SRTP connection. This works well for inbound and outbound calls. I have an issue with media, when I try hold -> unhold operation from FS for an outbound call. When FS tries to unhold the call by sending Re-INVITE, avaya responds with 200 OK. Then sends INVITE w/o SDP to shuffle the media(IP Shuffling, to make media flow directly b/w endpoints). FS responds with 200 OK + SDP as expected. Now avaya sends ACK + SDP where SDP has the updated connection info(IP and port of endpoint) where media should be sent. Along with this it also changes the crypto master key as per RFC due to change in connection info(c=). On seeing this ACK, FS update the connection info(which is good) and change its own crypto master key in response. however this new master key is not sent to far end, meaning FS can decode the media it receives but other end can't decode the media FS is sending to it resulting in one way audio. Has anyone come across this issue ? Is there any way to trigger Re-INVITE or UPDATE from FS so other end gets new master key ? Regards Prashanth _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting(a)freeswitch.org<mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin(a)gmail.com<mailto:ssinyagin@gmail.com>> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>> Cc: Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:55:37 +0200 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Compiling under SmartOS See the update at https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-7967 I fixed the compilation problems, and now there's a runtime issue. On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin(a)gmail.com<mailto:ssinyagin@gmail.com>> wrote: > I see there are some people on the list, working with SmartOS. > > The current master fails to compile: > https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-7967 > > Your input will be appreciated. > > I just started looking around and getting the feeling what SmartOS is. > I worked with Solaris quite a lot, but that was almost 10 years ago. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Prashanth Devarajappa <Prashanth.Devarajappa(a)enghouse.com<mailto:Prashanth.Devarajappa@enghouse.com>> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>> Cc: Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:53:42 +0000 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] OneWay audio after hold->unhold Hi Bob, I am told that our Avaya is “avaya communication manager is the 8300” So far with our testing, we have not seen any issues related to transfer. (May be we have not done extensive transfer tests) Prashanth From: Bob Hartwig [mailto:bobjectsfreeswitch@gmail.com<mailto:bobjectsfreeswitch@gmail.com>] Sent: 07 September 2015 17:42 To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] OneWay audio after hold->unhold Is this an Avaya AS5300 by any chance? Those have some serious interop issues when it comes to transfers. I had to struggle mightily to get a client's product (not Freeswitch) to interoperate with it. I'm really interested to hear if this gets resolved for Freeswitch. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Prashanth Devarajappa <Prashanth.Devarajappa(a)enghouse.com<mailto:Prashanth.Devarajappa@enghouse.com>> wrote: Hello, I am connecting to Avaya switch using SIP trunk interface from FS with TLS & SRTP connection. This works well for inbound and outbound calls. I have an issue with media, when I try hold -> unhold operation from FS for an outbound call. When FS tries to unhold the call by sending Re-INVITE, avaya responds with 200 OK. Then sends INVITE w/o SDP to shuffle the media(IP Shuffling, to make media flow directly b/w endpoints). FS responds with 200 OK + SDP as expected. Now avaya sends ACK + SDP where SDP has the updated connection info(IP and port of endpoint) where media should be sent. Along with this it also changes the crypto master key as per RFC due to change in connection info(c=). On seeing this ACK, FS update the connection info(which is good) and change its own crypto master key in response. however this new master key is not sent to far end, meaning FS can decode the media it receives but other end can't decode the media FS is sending to it resulting in one way audio. Has anyone come across this issue ? Is there any way to trigger Re-INVITE or UPDATE from FS so other end gets new master key ? Regards Prashanth _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting(a)freeswitch.org<mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

1 0

OneWay audio after hold->unhold
by Prashanth Devarajappa 08 Sep '15

08 Sep '15

Hello, I am connecting to Avaya switch using SIP trunk interface from FS with TLS & SRTP connection. This works well for inbound and outbound calls. I have an issue with media, when I try hold -> unhold operation from FS for an outbound call. When FS tries to unhold the call by sending Re-INVITE, avaya responds with 200 OK. Then sends INVITE w/o SDP to shuffle the media(IP Shuffling, to make media flow directly b/w endpoints). FS responds with 200 OK + SDP as expected. Now avaya sends ACK + SDP where SDP has the updated connection info(IP and port of endpoint) where media should be sent. Along with this it also changes the crypto master key as per RFC due to change in connection info(c=). On seeing this ACK, FS update the connection info(which is good) and change its own crypto master key in response. however this new master key is not sent to far end, meaning FS can decode the media it receives but other end can't decode the media FS is sending to it resulting in one way audio. Has anyone come across this issue ? Is there any way to trigger Re-INVITE or UPDATE from FS so other end gets new master key ? Regards Prashanth

3 6

Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users Digest, Vol 111, Issue 80
by kaleem rehman 07 Sep '15

07 Sep '15

Hi Bob, what kit are you using on avaya side, is this a communication manager? Also what version u using. .. r u connecting directly to CM or via session manager. If CM, have u checked IP network region where you placed freeswitch and if direct ip to ip on inter region is disabled Send the teunk config and I will be able to help u on communication manager or session manager side. Thanks Kaleem On 7 Sep 2015 18:37, <freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org> wrote: > Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to > freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freeswitch-users-request(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freeswitch-users-owner(a)lists.freeswitch.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: OneWay audio after hold->unhold (Bob Hartwig) > 2. Re: FreeSwitch - Performance issues (Michael Giagnocavo) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bob Hartwig <bobjectsfreeswitch(a)gmail.com> > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > Cc: > Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 11:41:55 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] OneWay audio after hold->unhold > Is this an Avaya AS5300 by any chance? Those have some serious interop > issues when it comes to transfers. I had to struggle mightily to get a > client's product (not Freeswitch) to interoperate with it. I'm really > interested to hear if this gets resolved for Freeswitch. > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Prashanth Devarajappa < > Prashanth.Devarajappa(a)enghouse.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I am connecting to Avaya switch using SIP trunk interface from FS with >> TLS & SRTP connection. This works well for inbound and outbound calls. I >> have an issue with media, when I try hold -> unhold operation from FS for >> an outbound call. >> >> >> >> When FS tries to unhold the call by sending Re-INVITE, avaya responds >> with 200 OK. Then sends INVITE w/o SDP to shuffle the media(IP Shuffling, >> to make media flow directly b/w endpoints). FS responds with 200 OK + SDP >> as expected. Now avaya sends ACK + SDP where SDP has the updated connection >> info(IP and port of endpoint) where media should be sent. Along with this >> it also changes the crypto master key as per RFC due to change in >> connection info(c=). >> >> >> >> On seeing this ACK, FS update the connection info(which is good) and >> change its own crypto master key in response. however this new master key >> is not sent to far end, meaning FS can decode the media it receives but >> other end can't decode the media FS is sending to it resulting in one way >> audio. >> >> >> >> Has anyone come across this issue ? >> >> >> >> Is there any way to trigger Re-INVITE or UPDATE from FS so other end gets >> new master key ? >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Prashanth >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________________ >> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: >> consulting(a)freeswitch.org >> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com >> >> Official FreeSWITCH Sites >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> http://confluence.freeswitch.org >> http://www.cluecon.com >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Giagnocavo <mgg(a)giagnocavo.net> > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > Cc: > Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 17:35:49 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues > > Email me direct (mgg(a)giagnocavo.net) next week and I’ll help out on this > if you’d like. > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Bote Man > *Sent:* Friday, September 4, 2015 7:53 AM > *To:* 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues > > > > This thread contains a great deal of useful intelligence that would be a > shame to lose. > > > > There is a recent discussion of developing a proven High Availability > configuration for FreeSWITCH; might there be a better way to track these > findings so that they can be documented as part of that effort, both by the > Documentation Team and by those doing the research? This is really good > stuff. > > > > My personal time is being consumed close to 100% right now so I won’t be > able to do anything with it until next week. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Bote > > Docs Team guy > > > > > > *From:* Shaun Stokes > *Sent:* Friday, 04 September, 2015 09:25 > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > We’re now seeing suitable performance on Hyper-V, but as we’re processing > media\RTP we will be moving to physical hardware. If we need FreeSwitch > servers to process SIP messages only we will consider these for > virtualization. > > > > Thanks for your help, > > Shaun > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [ > mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org > <freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org>] *On Behalf Of *Michael > Giagnocavo > *Sent:* 02 September 2015 21:19 > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues > > > > Years back, I used to run FS **on Windows**, under Hyper-V (2008), on a > Q6600 and had considerably higher perf numbers. Hundreds of CPS (shit > traffic), with 1000-2000 in progress channels (no media, ASR like 10% > maybe). So something is certainly pathologically wrong if you’re seeing > things get maxed out at the numbers you show. I didn’t do anything special, > and did routing both in-process via mod_managed as well as xml_curl. > > > > Do you have a reason not to put the FS core SQLite db on a tmpfs? That’s a > big win. Also make sure FS’s temp dir is a tmpfs. Unless you’re persisting > and using stuff between sessions, there’s no point in going to disk right? > And your random, small, IOPS are gonna be an order of magnitude less than > what you posted, at least. > > > > One thing to be aware of is CPU pinning and scheduling. First, on > multi-socket systems, you have NUMA. This really hurts. Raw memory > bandwidth takes a 40% hit. More importantly, you’re toasting your caches > (which with tons of threads happens a lot anyways). One number I like to > reference is that single ownership transfer of one cache line from socket > to another takes ~300 cycles (vs ~10 cycles for L2 and ~40 cycles for L3). > Hyper-V has an option to lock servers to a single NUMA node. Make sure this > is enabled (it may cause VMs not to start if it cannot allocate all the > resources requested – this is a good thing for VoIP apps). Then cap the > individual VMs so they aren’t scheduling all over the place (34 should not > need more than 1 CPU). FS spawns tons of threads and they’ll end up running > on all CPUs even if they don’t need all that time, and that then screws up > cache usage even more. But more importantly, it sounds like this is a busy > server? Are you sure you’re not just way oversubscribed and the VM is > losing out? Your steal% is 0 so I’m guessing HV isn’t reporting that > accurately. > > > > Only other thing that comes to mind is that Hyper-V does terrible with > time, so if you’re relying on HV time service you’re gonna be skewing all > over. I don’t think this should hurt FS directly, but you should run ntp > anyways to be safe. > > > > If you end up needing to scale up on a single server, you’re better off > running multiple FS instances, each pinned to specific cores. And you > should have OpenSIPS or something in front to do LB (and it provides a ton > of flexibility and handiness anyways). This probably only matters if you’re > doing high CPS (dialer or shit traffic that mostly isn’t completing). I’m > not sure what exactly you’re benching, but it sounds like your actual use > case is different than the test, eh? > > > > Email me directly and we can chat more about this. > > > > -Michael > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [ > mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org > <freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org>] *On Behalf Of *Shaun > Stokes > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 2, 2015 5:09 AM > *To:* 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues > > > > Hi Jay, > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > > > We’re actually using PostgreSQL, the file system is a 2TB RAID5 with 10x > 278GB SAS 10K RPM disks, read is 1GB/s (23,000 IOPS) write is 500MB/s > (15,000 IOPS) but we’re only using a fraction of this. > > > > Thanks, > > Shaun > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [ > mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org > <freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org>] *On Behalf Of *jay binks > *Sent:* 02 September 2015 11:37 > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues > > > > I may have missed it in your previous emails, but im assuming you have the > core DB on a tempfs > or somewhere other than the default location on spinning rust ? > > > > Jay > > > > On 2 September 2015 at 18:53, Shaun Stokes < > shaun.stokes(a)itec-support.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > > > I’m a huge fan of virtualization, but in our environment it simply doesn’t > provide the performance we’re looking for. The tests carried out were 10 > second calls which were routed to a Call Centre Queue with one registered > SIP extension as a member. > > > > There was a significant improvement when we tested on an Amazon VM in > comparison to Hyper-V, but we’d like a system which can handle large > volumes of call traffic, based on our tests this will need to be physical > hardware to achieve the best performance. > > > > Further to this, we have managed to resolve our initial problem with CPU > spikes on Hyper-V following these steps: > > · Disable VMQ on all physical and virtual adapters on the Hyper-V > host which are linked to the FreeSwitch VM > > · Reduce the virtual cores on all VMs to at least half of the > available physical cores > > · Increase the Processor Relative weight on the FreeSwitch VMs to > 200 (default 100) > > > > Thanks, > > Shaun > > > > *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Brian West > *Sent:* 01 September 2015 21:21 > > > *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues > > > > Shaun, > > > > 800 concurrent with 400cps, expectations are a little out of touch with > reality and your test is no where near real world. Your call duration is > ~2000ms, little to no time to actually do anything useful. You're burning > the bulk of your CPU time on signaling and doing no real work with the > session. > > > > So yes, you'll always get the best results out of bare metal, but you can > also get good performance on a VM (*) > > > > (*) This is in no way an endorsement of running FreeSWITCH in a VM, Your > mileage may vary depending on your specific application and load > requirements. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Shaun Stokes < > shaun.stokes(a)itec-support.co.uk> wrote: > > Update > > We've performed various tests and have come to the conclusion as advised > by others, that visualization is causing bottlenecks. > > Using Amazon EC2 on an 8 core high performance virtual server this maxed > out at around 800 concurrent sessions, 400 sessions per second. > > Using a Dell 1950 8 core server this was able to handle 1000 concurrent > sessions, 400 sessions per second and still have plenty of resource > available. Average CPU was fluctuating between 30-40% under peak load. > > Conclusion, if you want to run a high performance FreeSwitch server in a > production you should stick with physical hardware and avoid visualization > where possible. > ________________________________________ > From: freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [ > freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org] on behalf of Shaun Stokes [ > shaun.stokes(a)itec-support.co.uk] > Sent: 28 August 2015 15:37 > To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues > > Hi Nathan, > > Thanks for the suggestion, we still see the CPU spikes when is under load > after reducing to 8 cores but I think there may actually be an improvement > in the audio quality. > > It's still not what we're expecting, so we will have to test our build on > physical hardware too. > > Thanks, > Shaun > > -----Original Message----- > From: freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Nathan > Neulinger > Sent: 28 August 2015 15:04 > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org> > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues > > Yes, I know you said Hyper-V, I don't know if it has the same sort of > scheduler behavior or not, just mentioned the vmware for context. > > On 08/28/2015 08:46 AM, Nathan Neulinger wrote: > > One thing that I see jump out - you've probably got too many virtual > > cores defined on that VM, particularly since you've assigned # vcpu the > same as the number of real cores on the host system. > > > > Try your test again dropping that to 8 virtual CPUs and I think you > > might see better results. (Or at least drop to less than 100% of the > > total cores on the hardware.) > > > > Particularly if this host system has other vms running on it, you're > > hurting the vm scheduler's ability to hand out resources. With vmware, > > I believe a simple rule of thumb is that scheduler requires N-1 CPUs > > to be locked to schedule execution of an N cpu virtual machine - so even > if it doesn't need all of the CPUs, it has to reserve all of them any time > you have more than a 2 vCPU vm. > > > > -- Nathan > > > > On 08/28/2015 08:18 AM, Michael Jerris wrote: > >> The numbers your posting are fairly low, I'm guessing this is a > >> grossly underpowered vm that is causing your issues > >> > >> On Friday, August 28, 2015, Shaun Stokes < > shaun.stokes(a)itec-support.co.uk <mailto:shaun.stokes@itec-support.co.uk>> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Peter,____ > >> > >> __ __ > >> > >> Thanks for the advice, this is something we're already looking > into but we don't have the new hardware available > >> yet.____ > >> > >> __ __ > >> > >> Debian 8 has great integration with Hyper-V on 2012R2 and operates > as a Generation 2 VM, obviously it's never going > >> to be as good as running directly on the hardware but we were > >> hoping for better performance.____ > >> > >> __ __ > >> > >> Thanks,____ > >> > >> Shaun____ > >> > >> __ __ > >> > >> *From:*freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org');> > >> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org');>] *On Behalf Of *Peter > Olsson > >> *Sent:* 28 August 2015 10:43 > >> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org');>> > >> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance > >> issues____ > >> > >> __ __ > >> > >> If you want high performance, I recommend using real hardware, not > a virtual machine setup - it will cause you > >> issues.____ > >> > >> __ __ > >> > >> /Peter____ > >> > >> __ __ > >> > >> 2015-08-28 9:44 GMT+02:00 Shaun Stokes < > shaun.stokes(a)itec-support.co.uk > >> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','shaun.stokes(a)itec-support.co.uk');>>:__ > >> __ > >> > >> Hi Michael,____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> Thanks for the response and recommendation.____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> Our new build is now on Debian 8 Jessie, performance on the > system is noticeably better and any audio problems > >> while the system is under load are significantly reduced but > we do still experience spikes along with reduced > >> audio quality when the system is processing 20 calls per > >> second while already maintaining 80 existing calls.____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> We're still hitting some kind of bottleneck, what should we > expect to be able to support on a single piece of > >> hardware? We've kept our dialplans as small as possible and > we're using Memcache, but something tells me it's > >> the call setup process which is triggering the spikes, is this > possibly a limitation on the SIP profiles which > >> are single threaded?____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> I also see FreeSWITCH supports clustering but it's in relation > to high availability, is it possible to cluster a > >> single FreeSWITCH instance across multiple hardware or should > we be looking elsewhere to solve these > >> bottlenecks?____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> We switched to TCP Vegas on our new build as recommended on > the FreeSWITCH Wiki, this has provided a noticeable > >> reduction in audio latency but doesn't solve the issue with > >> CPU spikes.____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> Many Thanks,____ > >> > >> Shaun____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> *From:*freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org');> > >> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org');>] *On Behalf Of *Michael > Jerris > >> *Sent:* 15 August 2015 23:00 > >> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help < > freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org');>> > >> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance > >> issues____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> There are multiple known issues with Ubuntu 12.04. We > reccomend Debian 8 Jessie. > >> > >> On Friday, August 14, 2015, Shaun Stokes < > shaun.stokes(a)itec-support.co.uk > >> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','shaun.stokes(a)itec-support.co.uk');>> > >> wrote:____ > >> > >> Hi,____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> We're experiencing performance issues with FreeSwitch, our > target is 500 concurrent sessions, but at the > >> moment this starts to bottleneck around 30.____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> Host system:____ > >> > >> Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V Host____ > >> > >> AMD Opteron 4386 (2 processors) - 16 cores total____ > >> > >> 128GB DDR3____ > >> > >> 2TB RAID 5 (700MB/s tested read and write > >> throughput)____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> FreeSwitch Virtual Machine:____ > >> > >> FreeSwitch 1.4.15____ > >> > >> Ubuntu 12.04 LTS____ > >> > >> 16 Virtual cores (high priority)____ > >> > >> 2GB RAM (would assign more but FreeSwitch never seems to > >> use much)____ > >> > >> 500GB HD (on VHDX)____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> After around 30 concurrent sessions we begin to see CPU > spikes almost every time a new call comes in, as the > >> sessions increase the size and frequency of the CPU spikes > also increase. The system seems to be able to sit > >> comfortably with over 100 concurrent sessions and 80% idle > CPU, providing we don't have any new calls > >> hitting the platform. The spikes are causing audio (RTP) > to stutter or in some cases drop completely for a > >> few seconds.____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> The FreeSwitch spikes are occurring on all 16 cores, we > have been monitoring the system using htop and > >> mpstat.____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> This is an example of when we receive an inbound call > >> while we have 34 concurrent sessions:____ > >> > >> 14:26:04 CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq > %soft %steal %guest %idle____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 all 1.67 0.00 27.34 0.00 0.25 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.74____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 0 1.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 1 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.28____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 2 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.28____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 3 3.92 0.00 26.47 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.61____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 4 0.99 0.00 25.74 0.00 1.98 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.29____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 5 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.99 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.29____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 6 0.00 0.00 26.47 0.00 0.98 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.55____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 7 0.00 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.27____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 8 3.96 0.00 27.72 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.32____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 9 2.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 10 6.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.00____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 11 1.96 0.00 27.45 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.59____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 12 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.28____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 13 1.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00____ > >> > >> 14:26:05 14 0.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.00____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> This is when the system is not receiving an inbound call > but is sitting comfortably at 34 concurrent > >> sessions:____ > >> > >> 14:25:57 CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq > %soft %steal %guest %idle____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 all 0.87 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.12 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.39____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 0 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 1 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 2 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.04____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 3 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.98 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 6 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 7 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 8 5.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.00____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 9 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.00____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 10 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.00____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 11 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 13 1.98 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 97.03____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00____ > >> > >> 14:25:58 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> We're using FreeSwitch in multi-tenant mode, we have tried > dedicating a single VM for one tenancy but still > >> experience the issue. My assumption has been that this > will be due to the dialplan, I've optimized this > >> slightly by writing LUA scripts to handle some of the > inbound calls this appears to take away some of the > >> load but we're still using the internal dialplans for each > tenancy (tenancy dialplans have an average of 300 > >> entries).____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> We are using the following arguments when running > >> FreeSwitch:____ > >> > >> -rp -nc -nonat____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> I've seen another post which says we should operate > FreeSwitch in High Performance mode using -hp but can't > >> find anything information about this, is this still a > >> valid argument to use with FreeSwitch?____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> Has anyone experienced similar performance issues before > >> or have any advice?____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> Hope someone may be able help.____ > >> > >> ____ > >> > >> Thanks,____ > >> > >> Shaun____ > >> > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > >> This message has been checked for all known viruses by > MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. > >> > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> _____ > >> > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > >> This message has been checked for all known viruses by > MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. > >> > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> _____ > >> > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > >> This message has been checked for all known viruses by > MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. > >> > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> _____ > >> > >> > >> > _________________________________________________________________________ > >> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: > >> consulting(a)freeswitch.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > consulting(a)freeswitch.org');> > >> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com > >> > >> Official FreeSWITCH Sites > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> http://confluence.freeswitch.org > >> http://www.cluecon.com > >> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org');> > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org____ > >> > >> __ __ > >> > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > >> This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs > Virus Scanning Service. > >> > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> _____ > >> > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > >> This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs > Virus Scanning Service. > >> > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> _ > >> > >> > >> > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> ____ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: > >> consulting(a)freeswitch.org > >> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com > >> > >> Official FreeSWITCH Sites > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> http://confluence.freeswitch.org > >> http://www.cluecon.com > >> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-us > >> ers > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Nathan Neulinger nneul(a)mst.edu > Missouri S&T Information Technology (573) 612-1412 > System Administrator - Architect > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: > consulting(a)freeswitch.org > http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > http://www.freeswitch.org > http://confluence.freeswitch.org > http://www.cluecon.com > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: > consulting(a)freeswitch.org > http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > http://www.freeswitch.org > http://confluence.freeswitch.org > http://www.cluecon.com > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: > consulting(a)freeswitch.org > http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > http://www.freeswitch.org > http://confluence.freeswitch.org > http://www.cluecon.com > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > -- > > *Brian West* > brian(a)freeswitch.org > > [image: http://billing.freeswitch.org/templates/default/img/whmcslogo.png] > > *Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest* > http://www.freeswitchbook.com > http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com > > Got Bugs? Report them here <https://freeswitch.org/jira>! | Reddit: > /r/freeswitch <https://www.reddit.com/r/freeswitch> > > *T:*+19184209001 | *F:*+19184209002 | *M:*+1918424WEST (9378) > *iNUM:*+883 5100 1420 9001 | *ISN:*410*543 | *Skype:*briankwest > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: > consulting(a)freeswitch.org > http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > http://www.freeswitch.org > http://confluence.freeswitch.org > http://www.cluecon.com > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely > > Jay > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus > Scanning Service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > >

1 0

FreeSwitch - Performance issues
by Shaun Stokes 07 Sep '15

07 Sep '15

Hi, We're experiencing performance issues with FreeSwitch, our target is 500 concurrent sessions, but at the moment this starts to bottleneck around 30. Host system: Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V Host AMD Opteron 4386 (2 processors) - 16 cores total 128GB DDR3 2TB RAID 5 (700MB/s tested read and write throughput) FreeSwitch Virtual Machine: FreeSwitch 1.4.15 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 16 Virtual cores (high priority) 2GB RAM (would assign more but FreeSwitch never seems to use much) 500GB HD (on VHDX) After around 30 concurrent sessions we begin to see CPU spikes almost every time a new call comes in, as the sessions increase the size and frequency of the CPU spikes also increase. The system seems to be able to sit comfortably with over 100 concurrent sessions and 80% idle CPU, providing we don't have any new calls hitting the platform. The spikes are causing audio (RTP) to stutter or in some cases drop completely for a few seconds. The FreeSwitch spikes are occurring on all 16 cores, we have been monitoring the system using htop and mpstat. This is an example of when we receive an inbound call while we have 34 concurrent sessions: 14:26:04 CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %guest %idle 14:26:05 all 1.67 0.00 27.34 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.74 14:26:05 0 1.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00 14:26:05 1 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.28 14:26:05 2 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.28 14:26:05 3 3.92 0.00 26.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.61 14:26:05 4 0.99 0.00 25.74 0.00 1.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.29 14:26:05 5 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.29 14:26:05 6 0.00 0.00 26.47 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.55 14:26:05 7 0.00 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.27 14:26:05 8 3.96 0.00 27.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.32 14:26:05 9 2.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00 14:26:05 10 6.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.00 14:26:05 11 1.96 0.00 27.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.59 14:26:05 12 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.28 14:26:05 13 1.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00 14:26:05 14 0.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.00 This is when the system is not receiving an inbound call but is sitting comfortably at 34 concurrent sessions: 14:25:57 CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %guest %idle 14:25:58 all 0.87 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.39 14:25:58 0 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02 14:25:58 1 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02 14:25:58 2 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.04 14:25:58 3 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01 14:25:58 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02 14:25:58 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01 14:25:58 6 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01 14:25:58 7 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01 14:25:58 8 5.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.00 14:25:58 9 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.00 14:25:58 10 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.00 14:25:58 11 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02 14:25:58 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 14:25:58 13 1.98 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97.03 14:25:58 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 14:25:58 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 We're using FreeSwitch in multi-tenant mode, we have tried dedicating a single VM for one tenancy but still experience the issue. My assumption has been that this will be due to the dialplan, I've optimized this slightly by writing LUA scripts to handle some of the inbound calls this appears to take away some of the load but we're still using the internal dialplans for each tenancy (tenancy dialplans have an average of 300 entries). We are using the following arguments when running FreeSwitch: -rp -nc -nonat I've seen another post which says we should operate FreeSwitch in High Performance mode using -hp but can't find anything information about this, is this still a valid argument to use with FreeSwitch? Has anyone experienced similar performance issues before or have any advice? Hope someone may be able help. Thanks, Shaun ______________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. ______________________________________________________________________

13 26

mod_rtmp codec
by Paul Cuttler 07 Sep '15

07 Sep '15

It looks like mod_rtmp has the codec hard-coded to Speex. I was wondering if there was issues with getting other codecs to work. We'd really like to use PCMA/U. I've tried changing a couple of lines of code where the codec is set and it works okay in the incoming (play) direction, but is terribly distorted or just absent in the outgoing (publish) direction. Could someone please advise whether it's possible to use other codecs, and where I'm best to get started. thanks, Paul

2 2

Bridging to external SIP gateway doesn't seems to be called...
by Michael Nielsen 05 Sep '15

05 Sep '15

I'm running FreeSWITCH 1.4 on Debian 7. I've hooked up my FreeSWITCH to an external SIP gateway. The following scenarios work: FS -> FS SIP GW -> FS But the following scenario does not work: FS -> SIP GW I only have one single dial plan in my setup: <include> <extension name="test-dialplan"> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^\+(\d{3,20})$"> <action application="export" data="dialed_extension=$1"/> <action application="set" data="effective_caller_id_number=${outbound_caller_id_number}"/> <action application="set" data="effective_caller_id_name=${outbound_caller_id_name}"/> <action application="bridge" data="user/${dialed_extension}@ ${domain_name}"/> <action application="bridge" data="user/${dialed_extension}@ ${domain_name},sofia/gateway/sip-outbound/+${dialed_extension}"/> </condition> </extension> </include> My users are named the same as real GSM numbers (country code and number). I would like my FS to call internally if the user exists, if not, then route it to my SIP gateway for connecting to the GSM world. As mentioned, everything works except outgoing calls to the SIP gateway. What goes wrong?

1 2

Video gets garbled/corrupt after a few seconds
by Ankhit Vivekananda 04 Sep '15

04 Sep '15

Hello, I am new to using FreeSwitch. Recently, we started implementing FreeSwitch to place video conference calls between VoIP cameras. The ca,eras call into a conference room on FreeSwitch. The audio is fine during the call, but the video gets garbled after a few seconds. The call is based on SIP protocol. Are there any settings that can be configured for video to function properly. Presently set video parameters in the autoload_configs/conference.conf.xml file are: <param name="conference-flags" value="rfc-4579|livearray-sync|minimize-video-encoding"/> <param name="video-mode" value="mux"/> <param name="video-layout-name" value="2x2"/> <param name="video-layout-name" value="group:grid"/> <param name="video-canvas-size" value="1280x720"/> <param name="video-canvas-bgcolor" value="#333333"/> <param name="video-layout-bgcolor" value="#000000"/> <param name="video-codec-bandwidth" value="1mb"/> <param name="video-fps" value="15"/> Appreciate any help! Thanks, Ankhit

4 8

ACL Routing with multiple conditions.
by Tim King 04 Sep '15

04 Sep '15

I'm certain I am not the first one to try this, but I have been digging through forums and googling for 2 days now without success. I am trying to route toll free traffic based on the source ip's. I am using ACL's to match on the source IP. If i only use one of them it works, btu when I try to add the second no calls ever make it to the second condition. Here are the ways I have tried <extension name="tollfree_to_trunk1"> <condition field="${acl(${network_addr} trunk1)}" expression="true"/> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(\+?1)?(8(00|44|55|66|77|88)[2-9]\d{6})$"> <action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/> <action application="set" data="proxy_media=true"/> <action application="bridge" data="sofia/external/$2@1.1.1.1:5060"/> </condition> </extension> <extension name="tollfree_to_trunk2"> <condition field="${acl(${network_addr} trunk2)}" expression="true"/> <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(\+?1)?(8(00|44|55|66|77|88)[2-9]\d{6})$"> <action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/> <action application="set" data="proxy_media=true"/> <action application="bridge" data="sofia/external/$2@2.2.2.2:5060"/> </condition> </extension> The second is using the regex function. <extension name="tollfree_to_trunks"> <condition regex="all"> <regex field="destination_number" expression="^(\+?1)?(8(00|44|55|66|77|88)[2-9]\d{6})$"> <regex field="${acl(${network_addr} trunk1)}" expression="true"/> <action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/> <action application="set" data="proxy_media=true"/> <action application="set" data="sourceip=${network_addr}"/> <action application="bridge" data="sofia/external/$2@1.1.1.1:5060"/> <regex field="${acl(${network_addr} trunk2)}" expression="true"/> <action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/> <action application="set" data="proxy_media=true"/> <action application="set" data="sourceip=${network_addr}"/> <action application="bridge" data="sofia/external/$2@2.2.2.2:5060"/> </condition> </extension> Again in summary I am just trying to send toll free traffic to different gateways based on an acl match of the ip the call originates from. any help would be greatly appreciated.

1 0

ASTPP Version 2.2 is Released
by ASTPP Opensource VOIP Billing 04 Sep '15

04 Sep '15

Hi All, Hope you all are enjoying using Version 2.1 which was just released few days back. We highly appreciate your suggestion/feedback on it. Based on that and bugs found in it, we have made some quick updates and few improvements including bug fixes. Its been included in this latest version 2.2 *The list goes here:* 1. Resolved Paypal enable/disable issues #0000060 2. Corrected validations for state field in accounts module. #0000051 3. Resolved batch update issues in rates module 4. Improved footer layout 5. Improved error messages 6. Resolved dashboard graph issue for display decimal value 7. Resolved global DID number translation not accepting blank value issue 8. SIP Devices and Opensips Devices issues fixed 9. Resolved duplicate email address issues 10. Resolved button related issues 11. Accounts DID module validation issues 12. Resolved dialplan errors when number starting with + 13. Improved installation script 14. Resolved SIP device issues in customer edit 15. Resolved DID destination saving issue in reseller portal *To install v2.2:* # wget --no-check-certificate https://goo.gl/ETmAJl -O install.sh # chmod +x install.sh # ./install.sh *Upgrade steps from v2.1 to v2.2:* # wget --no-check-certificate https://goo.gl/RIuIej -O install.sh # chmod +x install.sh # ./install.sh *Want to get more out of ASTPP?* Empower your ASTPP with FM Addon: http://www.astpp.org/freeswitch-monitoring-addon In case if you find any issues, then please feel free to report in our bug tracker below: http://bugs.astpp.org/ Thank you everyone for your continuous support in ASTPP journey. Please donate at our paypal address donation(a)astpp.org to keep the project running smoothly. -- Regards, ASTPP Team iNextrix Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

1 0

FreeSWITCH Friday FreeForAll Reminder!
by Ken Rice 04 Sep '15

04 Sep '15

FreeSWITCHers, Do not forget to join us at 2PM CST for the FreeSWITCH Friday FreeFor All Visit http://ift.tt/1n3h0Pf and Click Call 888 with your WebRTC enabled Browser and headset, Call sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org or see http://ift.tt/1prwIZL for access info! -- Ken FreeSWITCH.org ClueCon.com OSTAG.org irc.freenode.net #freeswitch Twitter: @FreeSWITCH @ClueCon

1 0