July 2012 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

Error in compilation after git pull
by Neo Cheema 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Hi All, I did a git pull just now. After make clean, the compile failed. The latest git commit log that I can see is: commit 04bd463d12bf4c0116bec3cee537749b2040ed40 Author: Michael S Collins <msc(a)freeswitch.org> Date: Wed Jul 4 12:09:32 2012 -0700 The relevant error is: making all mod_spandsp Creating mod_spandsp_la-mod_spandsp.lo quiet_libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../src/include -I../../../../libs/xmlrpc-c -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/curl/include -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/src/include -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/src/include -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/libteletone/src -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DSWITCH_API_VISIBILITY=1 -DHAVE_VISIBILITY=1 -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/curl/include -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/src/include -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/src/include -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/libteletone/src -fPIC -Werror -fvisibility=hidden -DSWITCH_API_VISIBILITY=1 -DHAVE_VISIBILITY=1 -g -ggdb -DHAVE_OPENSSL -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/spandsp/src -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/tiff-3.8.2/libtiff -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/spandsp/src -I/usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/tiff-3.8.2/libtiff -I. -g -O2 -MT mod_spandsp_la-mod_spandsp.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/mod_spandsp_la-mod_spandsp.Tpo -c mod_spandsp.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/mod_spandsp_la-mod_spandsp.o In file included from /usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/spandsp/src/spandsp/expose.h:96, from /usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/spandsp/src/spandsp.h:135, from mod_spandsp.h:50, from mod_spandsp.c:39: /usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/spandsp/src/spandsp/private/ademco_contactid.h:33: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before ‘ademco_contactid_report_func_t’ cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/local/src/freeswitch/libs/spandsp/src/spandsp/private/ademco_contactid.h:48: error: struct has no members make[4]: *** [mod_spandsp_la-mod_spandsp.lo] Error 1 make[3]: *** [mod_spandsp-all] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 Am I missing something? I was able to compile a few weeks ago. Regards

4 3

Fs compatible phones?
by Todd Bailey 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Hi All, New to this tech and a bit confused on what to buy/features etc. I'm looking for a basic desk phone, perhaps with a few speed dial and maybe gee-wiz buttons. I found this one with a decent price 3Com NBX 1102 but the ad states Requires R4.X system software or greater. Not sure what this is nor do I need to? If I buy "any" digital phone that has a rj-45 ethernet jack does that automatically mean it's compatible? other models in my price/feature range Cisco CP-7940G Unified IP Phone I was looking at a few grand stream models but the reviews lead me to move on thanks

17 29

Multiple 183 SDP Change Codecs - allowed?
by Avi Marcus 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Are multiple 183s from the endpoint that changes the SDP allowed? I'm under the impression this is broken, similar to http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/NDLB#NDLB-allow-nondup-sdp ... which is why when the codec changes, FS freaks out and cancels the call because of codec negotiation error. Does that NDLB flag allow this, too? First has: audio 10116 RTP/AVP *0* 101 13 Second has: audio 49020 RTP/AVP *8* 13 101 PCAP: http://ge.tt/7MpyBwJ Can someone point me to the specific RFC so I can tell the supplier to fix it? And just curious.. what would make this allowed? A re-INVITE..? -Avi

7 18

how to play mp4 file
by Khue Nguyen Minh 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Hi all, I want play mp4 file in freeswitch. Please guide me how I can play it? Brs, Khue Nguyen.

2 1

Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH, NTP daemon and clock drift
by Peter Olsson 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Tony, I tested this on Windows, and found a few glitches (some are probably there for Linux as well). Could you please check out FS-4387 for a proposed patch. /Peter -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] För Anthony Minessale Skickat: den 4 juli 2012 00:16 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH, NTP daemon and clock drift My first instinct is to say: don't use boxes with unreliable timing in them since if they can't keep time, the precision for audio could be even worse. But, Its not an unreasonable request give this param a try in latest git: enable-use-system-time in switch.conf.xml the status uptime should still be right but the timestamps etc will follow system time. use at your own risk On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Anthony, > > There's previously been a discussion captured on > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Clock regarding the internal clock > time FS keeps. > > Currently FreeSWITCH uses the monotonic clock and ignores system time. > On machines where the time is very unreliable, NTP isn't in use and > the sysadmin is changing the time manually or by ntpdate the system > time can make large jumps - and I can indeed see the reasoning that > having FS use its own clock on these systems is more reliable as it > prevents billing time being lost because of a large clock jump. > > However, on systems correctly running ntpd that have clock drift the > system time will constantly be being corrected and won't experience > large jumps and in these cases the system time will be more accurate > than FreeSWITCH's internal time. > > On such systems although FreeSWITCH might not be losing billing > seconds from clock jumps (which shouldn't normally happen) the clock > drift will mean that there is also that clock drift present in > FreeSWITCH's CDRs - and these could conceivably cause billing disputes > where a customer's CDRs do not have the same times because their times > are more accurate than FS's due to that clock drift. This is unlikely > to be large enough to affect billed minutes much, but could put a > large number of calls on the wrong billing rate (eg if FS's internal > time in the CDRs identifies calls as on a peak rate when the customer > believes it is on an offpeak rate). On a badly drifting system over a > month on a large volume of calls that could become a noticeable discrepancy. > > Obviously there is the sync_clock option, but it seems you shouldn't > need to run that frequently (and would that cause any sideeffects?) > Running it infrequently would cause the same time-jumping behaviour > FS's internal time was designed to avoid, and sync_clock_when_idle > isn't possible on busier systems. > > On systems running ntpd perhaps it would be worth adding an opt-in > option that lets FreeSWITCH use the system time and rely on ntpd (but > keeping the present behaviour as the default)? > > Your thoughts please... > > Warm regards, > -Steve > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ___ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: > consulting(a)freeswitch.org > http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com > > FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server > http://www.cudatel.com > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > http://www.freeswitch.org > http://wiki.freeswitch.org > http://www.cluecon.com > > Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012 > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-use > rs > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900 _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting(a)freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4ff36ed932765090247789!

1 0

Freeswitch console log and file log
by Alexandr Kostenko 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Hi, Guys. Can you explain me more understandable about logs in freeswitch. Can I for example decrease console log level (or fully disable) and increase file log level? Also can full log level causing freeswitch crush ? Thanks

2 2

Registration from behind NAT doesn't work
by Adam Obuchowski 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Hi Im having problem on registering some sip devices that are behind NAT and dont support STUN. Please have a look at: ftp://v2.vrs.pl/pub/test.pcap Freeswitch replies to public IP which means it knows its NATed device, but why not to port that request comes from ? I found that this can be forced by <variable name="sip-force-contact" value="NDLB-tls-connectile-dysfunction"/> I have added this line to extension file under <variables> section, but it brings no results. Im new to freeswitch so if you need some action from my side, thread me as newbie. Kind regards, -- Adam Obuchowski

1 0

what is different between user who is registered or not registered using event?
by Samira Mh 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

as link below: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_lua/Serving_Configuration when registering (REGISTER) (register to sip phone) 2012-07-04 10:52:24.480734 [NOTICE] switch_cpp.cpp:1227 Debug from gen_dir_user_xml.lua, provided params: 'Event-Name: REQUEST_PARAMS Core-UUID: dc37b240-c596-11e1-b315-0daf7608d9db FreeSWITCH-Hostname: PBX FreeSWITCH-Switchname: PBX FreeSWITCH-IPv4: 192.168.10.89 FreeSWITCH-IPv6: %3A%3A1 Event-Date-Local: 2012-07-04%2010%3A52%3A24 Event-Date-GMT: Wed,%2004%20Jul%202012%2006%3A22%3A24%20GMT Event-Date-Timestamp: 1341382944480734 Event-Calling-File: sofia_reg.c Event-Calling-Function: sofia_reg_parse_auth Event-Calling-Line-Number: 2364 Event-Sequence: 1233 action: sip_auth sip_profile: internal sip_user_agent: eyeBeam%20release%201102q%20stamp%2051814 sip_auth_username: 1000 sip_auth_realm: 192.168.10.89 sip_auth_nonce: 9e86a118-c5a0-11e1-b324-0daf7608d9db sip_auth_uri: sip%3A192.168.10.89 sip_contact_user: 1000 sip_contact_host: 192.168.18.120 sip_to_user: 1000 sip_to_host: 192.168.10.89 sip_from_user: 1000 sip_from_host: 192.168.10.89 sip_request_host: 192.168.10.89 sip_auth_qop: auth sip_auth_cnonce: ccbce7a4be40e6660e1a39350b5610b9 sip_auth_nc: 00000001 sip_auth_response: b7c175e2b6680b43300a36aa3c50356a sip_auth_method: REGISTER key: id user: 1000 domain: 192.168.10.89 ip: 192.168.18.120 and when user want to logout(unregistered from sip phone) 2012-07-04 10:52:53.440720 [NOTICE] switch_cpp.cpp:1227 Debug from gen_dir_user_xml.lua, provided params: 'Event-Name: REQUEST_PARAMS Core-UUID: dc37b240-c596-11e1-b315-0daf7608d9db FreeSWITCH-Hostname: PBX FreeSWITCH-Switchname: PBX FreeSWITCH-IPv4: 192.168.10.89 FreeSWITCH-IPv6: %3A%3A1 Event-Date-Local: 2012-07-04%2010%3A52%3A53 Event-Date-GMT: Wed,%2004%20Jul%202012%2006%3A22%3A53%20GMT Event-Date-Timestamp: 1341382973440720 Event-Calling-File: sofia_reg.c Event-Calling-Function: sofia_reg_parse_auth Event-Calling-Line-Number: 2364 Event-Sequence: 1254 action: sip_auth sip_profile: internal sip_user_agent: eyeBeam%20release%201102q%20stamp%2051814 sip_auth_username: 1000 sip_auth_realm: 192.168.10.89 sip_auth_nonce: 9e86a118-c5a0-11e1-b324-0daf7608d9db sip_auth_uri: sip%3A192.168.10.89 sip_contact_user: 1000 sip_contact_host: 192.168.18.120 sip_to_user: 1000 sip_to_host: 192.168.10.89 sip_from_user: 1000 sip_from_host: 192.168.10.89 sip_request_host: 192.168.10.89 sip_auth_qop: auth sip_auth_cnonce: 6096bb96b4316b2a47bf52299b9156f5 sip_auth_nc: 00000002 sip_auth_response: 7bdb41c435cb7f46bc44b52fce5c7034 sip_auth_method: REGISTER key: id user: 1000 domain: 192.168.10.89 ip: 192.168.18.120 in both the event sip_auth_method is REGISTERED and every header parameter are the same, but in the second one the user is not registered now ! how to find out the different between them ?

1 0

conference param video-floor-only
by Seven Du 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Hi, What is video-floor-only trying to do in conference? I assume it tries to freeze the floor holder ( and his video) as long as he has video, but in my testing it's not the case, I set the param in the default profile and it seems doesn't make any difference. I tried the following change it looks more clear to me and seems works as what I expected. - if ((!floor_holder || (imember->score_iir > SCORE_IIR_SPEAKING_MAX && (floor_holder->score_iir < SCORE_IIR_SPEAKING_MIN))) && - (!switch_test_flag(conference, CFLAG_VID_FLOOR) || switch_channel_test_flag(channel, CF_VIDEO))) { - floor_holder = imember; + if (switch_channel_test_flag(channel, CF_VIDEO)) { + if (!floor_holder) { + floor_holder = imember; + } else if ((imember->score_iir > SCORE_IIR_SPEAKING_MAX) && (floor_holder->score_iir < SCORE_IIR_SPEAKING_MIN) && + (!switch_test_flag(conference, CFLAG_VID_FLOOR))) { + floor_holder = imember; + } } Another thing I found is that in the normal case(without floor-only set), the video changes according to the volume of the speaker fine, but if the floor press 0 to be muted, there's no chance of other members can get the floor, is there a problem? Thanks. -- About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com)

1 0

FreeSWITCH, NTP daemon and clock drift
by Steven Ayre 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

Anthony, There's previously been a discussion captured on http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Clock regarding the internal clock time FS keeps. Currently FreeSWITCH uses the monotonic clock and ignores system time. On machines where the time is very unreliable, NTP isn't in use and the sysadmin is changing the time manually or by ntpdate the system time can make large jumps - and I can indeed see the reasoning that having FS use its own clock on these systems is more reliable as it prevents billing time being lost because of a large clock jump. However, on systems correctly running ntpd that have clock drift the system time will constantly be being corrected and won't experience large jumps and in these cases the system time will be more accurate than FreeSWITCH's internal time. On such systems although FreeSWITCH might not be losing billing seconds from clock jumps (which shouldn't normally happen) the clock drift will mean that there is also that clock drift present in FreeSWITCH's CDRs - and these could conceivably cause billing disputes where a customer's CDRs do not have the same times because their times are more accurate than FS's due to that clock drift. This is unlikely to be large enough to affect billed minutes much, but could put a large number of calls on the wrong billing rate (eg if FS's internal time in the CDRs identifies calls as on a peak rate when the customer believes it is on an offpeak rate). On a badly drifting system over a month on a large volume of calls that could become a noticeable discrepancy. Obviously there is the sync_clock option, but it seems you shouldn't need to run that frequently (and would that cause any sideeffects?) Running it infrequently would cause the same time-jumping behaviour FS's internal time was designed to avoid, and sync_clock_when_idle isn't possible on busier systems. On systems running ntpd perhaps it would be worth adding an opt-in option that lets FreeSWITCH use the system time and rely on ntpd (but keeping the present behaviour as the default)? Your thoughts please... Warm regards, -Steve

2 1