January 2011 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

GSM/PSTN Gateways
by Deon Vermeulen 22 Jan '11

22 Jan '11

Hi List I've been searching the Net a lot the past couple of days looking for relatively good priced Internal and External GSM and PSTN Gateways. I did come up with couple devices, but they still seem a bit expensive. One device that did draw my attention though is the DuMV@PCI GSM Card. http://www.portech.com.tw/p3-product1_1.asp?Pid=15 Do no if this will work in FreeSwitch? Would really appreciate suggestions on products used. Thank you very much Regards Deon

8 13

praise of freeSWITCH developers
by Madovsky 22 Jan '11

22 Jan '11

I would like to remember to all people on this emailist that all freeSWITCH guys work very hard to update/upgrade and make FS more powerful, and also to answer to hundreds of user emails every day. Donations are welcome and appreciated. It helps the humans behind the machine who give to you the opportunity to create and use amazing projects and to continue to make this open source project alive and active. Regards

10 13

RFC 2833 DTMF detection - has something changed?
by Peter Olsson 22 Jan '11

22 Jan '11

Hi, I have some problems with DTMF detection, which I've never seen earlier versions. I know that there was a bug in the rtp code a few days (or week(s)?) back, but I'm running on latest git (as of today). I'm also running on the same machine as before, and more or less no config changes (except for a few dialplan changes, but nothing that changes DTMF detection). Anyway, it seems to me that the 2833-detection is not as accurate as it was before. When using a couple of months old FS version I rarely missed any DTMF's (I can't remember I ever did..:)), but now it seems to happen once in a while. Also, I decided today to get wireshark up and running, and after 5 DTMF's, FS missed the last one. I looked inside my wireshark dump, and I could clearly see all DTMF packets in there, but FS somehow missed this. Is there some kind of debugging I could enable, for instance DEBUG_2833 directive? What's the best way to move this forward? I can send my wireshark dump if that helps, but I guess you will need some more debugging info from FS as well? Thanks, Peter Olsson

4 9

Run dialplan tools from event socket
by Fraser Redmond 22 Jan '11

22 Jan '11

Is there any way to run a dialplan tool from the event socket? I have a dialplan that uses a dtmf to set up and perform an attended transfer, like so: <action application="bind_meta_app" data="8 a s execute_extension::TransferCall XML transfer_call"/> But I can't see any way to run the same thing from the event socket. I thought doing an "api uuid_transfer" might do it, but that hangs up one of the legs (no good for attended transfer.) api uuid_transfer Uuid -bleg TransferCall XML transfer_call As far as I can see, the closest thing is "sendmsg execute", but it looks like you have to park a call/channel first to use that, so I'm not sure that that is much use for attended transfer either. Or should I be lame and do "api uuid_send_dtmf" to send * 8. Cheers, Fraser

6 9

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Question aboutCPU usage.
by Ricardo Martinez 22 Jan '11

22 Jan '11

Hello. I have the opportunity to use an even more powerful server. I have just installed CentOS 5.5 64 bit, and compile freeswitch with 64 bits. This is the output with 100 simm calls using transcoding from G711 to G729 top - 16:57:56 up 6:04, 2 users, load average: 11.60, 12.49, 12.58 Tasks: 168 total, 1 running, 167 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu0 : 35.4%us, 0.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 63.6%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st Cpu1 : 34.9%us, 0.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 58.8%id, 4.9%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.7%si, 0.0%st Cpu2 : 34.9%us, 0.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 59.6%id, 4.1%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.7%si, 0.0%st Cpu3 : 35.0%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 62.0%id, 1.8%wa, 0.2%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st Cpu4 : 35.8%us, 1.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 62.5%id, 0.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st Cpu5 : 35.6%us, 1.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 60.1%id, 1.8%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.8%si, 0.0%st Cpu6 : 35.8%us, 1.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 59.9%id, 1.5%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.8%si, 0.0%st Cpu7 : 36.5%us, 2.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 60.6%id, 0.7%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st Mem: 8165808k total, 1208292k used, 6957516k free, 150228k buffers Swap: 10223608k total, 0k used, 10223608k free, 772980k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 5265 root 18 0 541m 79m 5796 S 469.5 1.0 1077:32 freeswitch 1 root 15 0 10348 684 572 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.24 init 2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/1 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 Is normal the load average? This is the output with uname –a [root@siptrcrv2 snmp]# uname -a Linux siptrcrv2 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Fri Apr 2 14:58:14 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Regards, Ricardo.- *De:* freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org] *En nombre de *Brian West *Enviado el:* miércoles, 19 de enero de 2011 16:22 *Para:* FreeSWITCH Users Help *Asunto:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Question aboutCPU usage. Chances are if you would install a 64bit OS on that there NICE 64bit CPU it would work much better. /b On Jan 19, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Ricardo Martinez wrote: Hello. [root@ser-ng bin]# uname -a Linux 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686.PAE #1 SMP Fri Jun 11 09:42:24 UTC 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Ricardo.- *De:* freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org] *En nombre de *Brian West *Enviado el:* miércoles, 19 de enero de 2011 15:41 *Para:* FreeSWITCH Users Help *Asunto:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Question aboutCPU usage. Depend what does uname -a say? /b

5 4

Caller ID Number not going out on PRI
by Phone 21 Jan '11

21 Jan '11

A few upgrades ago, the Caller ID Number on outbound calls stopped working. Now it always displays the extension number, where before it was using the value specified in the directory entry. Seems like maybe the variables are not passing from the directory entry to the dial plan. Any ideas?

3 3

Transfer to extension
by Kenan BEKTAS 21 Jan '11

21 Jan '11

Folks, Have an issue here. I need to have an extension to be answered by/like IVR., i.e, if the extension is rung, then, the IVR should pick up. Calling 23 from 45, and IVR should take the call to 23. Could anybody provide me some pointers or dialplan examples, please? Thanks a bunch, -Kenan

3 5

moderator conference flag and nibblebill
by Madovsky 21 Jan '11

21 Jan '11

if a caller in waste mode go to a conference where the moderator isn't into nibblebill starts to debit his account. I can't guess hwo I can manage that in a dialplan to start debit once the conference really starts Any ?

3 4

dialplan - expression matching and variable
by Weigel, Stefan 21 Jan '11

21 Jan '11

Hi all, why is the following not working: <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(500)$|^(600)$"> <action application="set" data="dialed_number=$1"/> <-- $1 is empty when using the following not working: Stefan Weigel Advanced IT-Professional Tel.: +49 89 2000 48 975 Fax: +49 89 2000 48 566 eMail: Stefan.Weigel(a)allianz-warranty.com<mailto:Stefan.Weigel@allianz-warranty.com> Allianz Automotive Services GmbH Einsteinring 28 85609 Aschheim Germany http://www.allianz-warranty.com Geschäftsführung: Andreas Rösing, Horst Ziegler Amtsgericht München, HRB 175682 Für Umsatzsteuerzwecke: Ust-ID-Nr.: DE 262 617 720

2 1

dialplan - expression matching and variable - 2nd try
by Weigel, Stefan 21 Jan '11

21 Jan '11

Hi all, sorry for the first message, I hit the wrong keys an Outlook sent the message...once again: why is the following not working: <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(500)$|^(600)$"> <action application="set" data="dialed_number=$1"/> <-- $1 is empty when using the above expression, $1 is empty. If I do it like this <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(5\d\d)$|^(6\d\d)$"> <action application="set" data="dialed_number=$1"/> <-- $1 is empty It's working. I don't understand why. Thanks in advance and best regards, Stefan

3 3