August 2009 - FreeSWITCH-users - FreeSWITCH Mailing Lists

ESL for Perl
by velusamy velu 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Dear all, When I do make for Perl ESL libraries in "esl/perl" directory I have got the following error. /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o: In function `_start': ../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:115: undefined reference to `main' esl_wrap.o: In function `_wrap_eslSetLogLevel': esl_wrap.cpp:(.text+0x1c10): undefined reference to `eslSetLogLevel' esl_wrap.o: In function `_wrap_ESLconnection_setEventLock': esl_wrap.cpp:(.text+0x3395): undefined reference to `ESLconnection::setEventLock(char const*)' esl_wrap.o: In function `_wrap_ESLconnection_setBlockingExecute': esl_wrap.cpp:(.text+0x3c65): undefined reference to `ESLconnection::setBlockingExecute(char const*)' esl_wrap.o: In function `_wrap_ESLconnection_execute': esl_wrap.cpp:(.text+0x41ab): undefined reference to `ESLconnection::execute(char const*, char const*, char const*)' ........ I have understood the when creating soft link ESL.o that error has occurred. What is the problem? Is there any dependency to create that link? please help me....... Thanks Regards, Velusamy

2 1

Outbound socket question
by Nik Middleton 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Hi Guys, I'm using an outbound socket to control calls, and it works a charm. However, what I'd like to do is send a custom event regarding the call on hang-up. The way I see things happening at the moment, and I could be wrong, is that the socket is closed when a hang-up occurs, so am I taking a chance trying to send the event then? (try to sneak out the event before socket closure happens) The other option is of course to open an inbound socket and send the event, but I'd rather not do that if possible. Regards

5 6

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zapata.conf immediate=yes in Asterisk - Freeswitch equivalent?
by Merul Patel 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Hi, I came across this thread (http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2009-January/010172.… ) from January, and I'm having a similar problem, in that from the moment an incoming analogue call starts ringing, it takes around 5-7 seconds before the dialplan gets executed. Tailing the freeswitch log (pastebin'd here: http://pastebin.com/f2a6f7945) , it seems to indicate that there is either a problem with an unhandled event 17 and/or a delay with the call being put in the GET_CALLERID state. In my case, I'm more concerned about answering the call rather than getting the caller id, so I tried setting <param name="enable- callerid" value="false"/> in openzap.conf.xml, as per the earlier post's author but this still doesn't get the dialplan to execute immediately. I'm running FS 1.0.4 built from the tarball, with zaptel 1.4.12.1 and wanpipe 3.5.4.18 in conjunction with a USBFXO device from Sangoma. I'm using the out -of-the-box configuration for FS, with the exception of one modified public dialplan. My openzap.conf.xml is: <configuration name="openzap.conf" description="OpenZAP Configuration"> <settings> <param name="debug" value="0"/>    </settings> <pri_spans/>  <analog_spans> <span id="1">    <param name="tonegroup" value="uk"/> <param name="digit-timeout" value="2000"/> <param name="max-digits" value="11"/> <param name="dialplan" value="XML"/> <param name="context" value="public"/> <param name="enable-callerid" value="true"/>     </span> </analog_spans> </configuration> Couldn't find any jiras for this issue, so not sure whether it was resolved. Any pointers would be welcome. BR Merul

2 1

Question about dynamic registration
by Juan Backson 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Hi, Other than curl, is there anyway to do dynamic registration? It there anyway to embed a script in freeswitch to do the authorization? Thanks, Anne

3 3

Question about using switch_caller_extension_add_application
by Woody Dickson 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Hi, I want to implement a module where freeSWITCH would try to bridge to an extension and if the bridging operation fails, my module can use the hangup code to determine the next cause of action. With switch_caller_extension_add_application(session, extension, "bridge", "sofia/gateway/mygw/1232323);, if there is an error ( 503 received for instance ) in the outgoing INVITE, freeSWITCH would leave my module ( or the module's APP) and go on to the next action. Is there anyway to control it so that freeSWITCH would remain to be within the module's APP funtion and continue executing the code after switch_call_extension_add_application, when let's say a 4XX or 5XX or CANCEL ( from originator) is received? I have tried it and found that if the bridging is successful, freeSWITCH would continue executing the code after switch_caller_extension_add_application, but if an error is received, then it would just move on to the next action. Does anyone know how to deal with this problem? Woody

4 6

ESL Wrapper
by Rex Alex 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Hi All, I am new to freeswitch but installed(freeswitch version 1.0.3), configured and tested successfully. Now I want to do the dialling funtions through a php script. Read about Event Socket Library(ESL). How to implement the same in freeswitch. Please assist. Thanks, Rex

11 19

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Outbound Proxy
by Darren Williams 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

This produces: send 639 bytes to udp/[62.239.15.140]:5060 at 09:06:29.640488: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ REGISTER sip:bmnha-01.bt.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 91.121.159.57:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKQFFy1Ug5DcU0S Max-Forwards: 70 From: <sip:05061292117@bmnha-01.bt.com;transport=udp>;tag=NKaDDXrtme3Sr To: <sip:05061292117@bmnha-01.bt.com;transport=udp> Call-ID: 88de957f-0907-4488-9b19-043ff13391f4 CSeq: 118570058 REGISTER Contact: <sip:gw+05061292117@91.121.159.57:5080;transport=udp> Expires: 3600 User-Agent: THOMSON ST2030 hw5 fw1.56 00-1F-9F-16-4E-99 Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv 726 bytes from udp/[62.239.15.140]:5060 at 09:06:29.656368: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 91.121.159.57:5080;received=91.121.159.57;branch=z9hG4bKQFFy1Ug5DcU0S;rport=5080 From: <sip:05061292117@bmnha-01.bt.com;transport=udp>;tag=NKaDDXrtme3Sr To: <sip:05061292117@bmnha-01.bt.com;transport=udp>;tag=SD567ec99-8a92eaf49d827b084b51e364ec68ae70.bc35 Call-ID: 88de957f-0907-4488-9b19-043ff13391f4 CSeq: 118570058 REGISTER WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="bmnha-01.bt.com", nonce="4a77fb4b6fe33ffccf77e6bdd6f7a7a397cdfd17", qop="auth" Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.6 (sparc/solaris)) Content-Length: 0 Warning: 392 sip:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=9150 req_src_ip=172.20.92.61 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:bmnha-01.bt.com out_uri=sip:bmnha-01.bt.com via_cnt==1" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2009-08-04 11:06:29.655585 [ERR] sofia_reg.c:1460 05061292117 Registration Failed with status Operation has no matching challenge [904]. failure #1 and so on. Should my side not have responded at this point with another REGISTER with auth information in? From: freeswitch-users-bounces(a)lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Brian West Sent: 04 August 2009 04:36 To: freeswitch-users(a)lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Outbound Proxy Put the real hostname in register-proxy and outbound-proxy and the proxy needs to hold the fake one. /b On Aug 3, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Darren Williams wrote: The bmnha-01.bt.com is the one that doesnt resolve www.bbvservice-560129.bt.com resolves to 62.239.15.140 __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4299 (20090802) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4299 (20090802) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com

2 1

1.0.4 builds 1.0.3_1 debs
by alan＠chandlerfamily.org.uk 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

I just downloaded 1.0.4 and build debian packages with it, and it delivered .deb files names as 1.0.3-1

2 1

Auto Nat
by alan＠chandlerfamily.org.uk 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

I sent my first e-mail to the list this morning (about 4 hours ago) but it does not seem to have arrived back, even though I have received other, later posts. I have another question related to the first (about how to set everything up in a double nat environment) - so if I see this and not the other, I will send the first again. I am currently running the stable version 1.0.3 of freeswitch. The wiki page says that auto-nat is introduced at r 13612. Is this before or after that revision? (I don't want to have to download and rebuild the entire thing if I don't have to).

2 1

Best practices / tips for Event socket daemon
by Nicolas Brenner 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Hi, I built an event socket daemon that waits for certain events, when it receives those events, it does some processing and keeps waiting for more events. The daemon is written on PHP and uses a slightly modified version of fs_sock.php (from contrib/intralanman/PHP/fs_sock/). What I am doing / what I want to do: I am generating calls and bridging them using a JS script. Then the daemon logs the info about the calls and keeps track of their status in a database. The problem is: the daemon is apparently missing out on some events, and I think it is because of the processing/updating on the DB it has to do each time it "catches" an event on the socket. My question is: which language would you recommend for the task, and how would you go about handling events? Should the dameon fork a process for each event it receives so that it doesn't miss any events? should there be more than one daemon? ... any tips and recommendations are welcome. Thanks! Nicolas

2 1