Scaling FreeSWITCH horizontally with master master replication
Hi All I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load. Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ? or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ? -- Ashwin Kumar Rath
I should understand all your boxes are in same LAN right? db replication is good and secure, but always remember you MUST mater your software. Its like trying to drive a manual car if you only know automatic. Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz CISSP, CISM, CISA Linux, VoIP and much more fun www.okay.com.mx Need LCR? Check out LCR for FusionPBX with FreeSWITCH Need Billing? Check out Billing for FusionPBX with FreeSWITCH 2015-01-02 14:39 GMT-05:00 Ashwin Rath <ashwinrath@gmail.com>:
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
"...ask if master master replication is reliable..." ^^^ this is more of a postgres question about master-master replication "..be a better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?" ^^^ i think it would be better to have a cluster that all FS servers connect to On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ashwin Rath <ashwinrath@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Hi Ashwin, I don't know very well Postgres but I achieved pretty much the same (horizontal scaling) with a MySQL cluster. Replication is a bit painful to setup and to maintain (especially master master, including db desynchronization when crashes occur and so on). I would go for a cluster, almost endlessly scalable and very very reliable. It is more costly to setup but I think it is worth the pain. My feelings, I don't pretend to be a reference though :) Florent Le 2 janv. 2015 20:42, "Ashwin Rath" <ashwinrath@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Thenk you all. My main concern was that master master replication is something that is used for a dual redundant deployment . Just not sure if it is reliable with multiple boxes . I have read about people having good luck with xtradb (percona) for MySQL but i think the general opinion is in favor of a cluster than having master-master replication with 'sharded' data. @Luis : Yes they are all on the same LAN. On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Florent Krieg <flokrrr@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
I don't know very well Postgres but I achieved pretty much the same (horizontal scaling) with a MySQL cluster. Replication is a bit painful to setup and to maintain (especially master master, including db desynchronization when crashes occur and so on). I would go for a cluster, almost endlessly scalable and very very reliable. It is more costly to setup but I think it is worth the pain.
My feelings, I don't pretend to be a reference though :)
Florent Le 2 janv. 2015 20:42, "Ashwin Rath" <ashwinrath@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
Hi Ashwin, take a look at mariaDB Galera Multi-Master Cluster 10.0.15. I run 2x Cluster and each Cluster with 6x DB Nodes. A total of 12x DB Server mariaDB Galera Multi-Master Cluster Features * Synchronous replication * Active-active multi-master topology * Read and write to any cluster node * Automatic membership control, failed nodes drop from the cluster * Automatic node joining * T*rue parallel replication, on row level !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!* * Direct client connections, native MySQL look & feel Benefits The above features yield several benefits for a DBMS clustering solution, including: * No slave lag * No lost transactions * Both read and write scalability * Smaller client latencies source: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/documentation/replication/galera/what-is-m... Regards Rainer Piper Am 03.01.2015 um 07:38 schrieb Ashwin Rath:
Thenk you all. My main concern was that master master replication is something that is used for a dual redundant deployment . Just not sure if it is reliable with multiple boxes . I have read about people having good luck with xtradb (percona) for MySQL but i think the general opinion is in favor of a cluster than having master-master replication with 'sharded' data.
@Luis : Yes they are all on the same LAN.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Florent Krieg <flokrrr@gmail.com <mailto:flokrrr@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
I don't know very well Postgres but I achieved pretty much the same (horizontal scaling) with a MySQL cluster. Replication is a bit painful to setup and to maintain (especially master master, including db desynchronization when crashes occur and so on). I would go for a cluster, almost endlessly scalable and very very reliable. It is more costly to setup but I think it is worth the pain.
My feelings, I don't pretend to be a reference though :)
Florent
Le 2 janv. 2015 20:42, "Ashwin Rath" <ashwinrath@gmail.com <mailto:ashwinrath@gmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- *Rainer Piper* Integration engineer Koeslinstr. 56 53123 BONN GERMANY Phone: +49 228 97167161 <callto:004922897167161> P2P: sip:rainer@sip.soho-piper.de:5072 (pjsip-test) XMPP: rainer@xmpp.soho-piper.de
I'm currently using Percona XTraDB cluster in a 3 node setup as backend for FS, with keepalived used for managing the live database IP. How is the stability/maturity of the MariaDB implementation? What are you using to manage the the rapid failover between DB nodes/ip failover? -- Nathan On 01/03/2015 01:21 AM, Rainer Piper wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
take a look at mariaDB Galera Multi-Master Cluster 10.0.15. I run 2x Cluster and each Cluster with 6x DB Nodes. A total of 12x DB Server
mariaDB Galera Multi-Master Cluster
Features
* Synchronous replication * Active-active multi-master topology * Read and write to any cluster node * Automatic membership control, failed nodes drop from the cluster * Automatic node joining * T*rue parallel replication, on row level !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!* * Direct client connections, native MySQL look & feel
Benefits
The above features yield several benefits for a DBMS clustering solution, including:
* No slave lag * No lost transactions * Both read and write scalability * Smaller client latencies
source: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/documentation/replication/galera/what-is-m...
Regards Rainer Piper
Am 03.01.2015 um 07:38 schrieb Ashwin Rath:
Thenk you all. My main concern was that master master replication is something that is used for a dual redundant deployment . Just not sure if it is reliable with multiple boxes . I have read about people having good luck with xtradb (percona) for MySQL but i think the general opinion is in favor of a cluster than having master-master replication with 'sharded' data.
@Luis : Yes they are all on the same LAN.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Florent Krieg <flokrrr@gmail.com <mailto:flokrrr@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
I don't know very well Postgres but I achieved pretty much the same (horizontal scaling) with a MySQL cluster. Replication is a bit painful to setup and to maintain (especially master master, including db desynchronization when crashes occur and so on). I would go for a cluster, almost endlessly scalable and very very reliable. It is more costly to setup but I think it is worth the pain.
My feelings, I don't pretend to be a reference though :)
Florent
Le 2 janv. 2015 20:42, "Ashwin Rath" <ashwinrath@gmail.com <mailto:ashwinrath@gmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- *Rainer Piper* Integration engineer Koeslinstr. 56 53123 BONN GERMANY Phone: +49 228 97167161 <callto:004922897167161> P2P: sip:rainer@sip.soho-piper.de:5072 (pjsip-test) XMPP: rainer@xmpp.soho-piper.de
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger nneul@mst.edu Missouri S&T Information Technology (573) 612-1412 System Administrator - Architect
Thank you Rainer for the info about MariaDB. I shall certainly try it out. I am trying this out for the first time. At present i am running some tests on Postgre with master master replication between freeswitch hosts.There would be say 5 FS boxes each having Postgre and FS and all the Postgres instances would be replicated in master-master mode. There is no cluster or HA DB. Each FreeSWITCH interacts only with its own postgres instance. Would the above configuration be the right way to move forward ? On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Nathan Neulinger <nneul@mst.edu> wrote:
I'm currently using Percona XTraDB cluster in a 3 node setup as backend for FS, with keepalived used for managing the live database IP. How is the stability/maturity of the MariaDB implementation?
What are you using to manage the the rapid failover between DB nodes/ip failover?
-- Nathan
On 01/03/2015 01:21 AM, Rainer Piper wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
take a look at mariaDB Galera Multi-Master Cluster 10.0.15. I run 2x Cluster and each Cluster with 6x DB Nodes. A total of 12x DB Server
mariaDB Galera Multi-Master Cluster
Features
* Synchronous replication * Active-active multi-master topology * Read and write to any cluster node * Automatic membership control, failed nodes drop from the cluster * Automatic node joining * T*rue parallel replication, on row level !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!* * Direct client connections, native MySQL look & feel
Benefits
The above features yield several benefits for a DBMS clustering solution, including:
* No slave lag * No lost transactions * Both read and write scalability * Smaller client latencies
source: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/documentation/replication/galera/what-is-m...
Regards Rainer Piper
Am 03.01.2015 um 07:38 schrieb Ashwin Rath:
Thenk you all. My main concern was that master master replication is something that is used for a dual redundant deployment . Just not sure if it is reliable with multiple boxes . I have read about people having good luck with xtradb (percona) for MySQL but i think the general opinion is in favor of a cluster than having master-master replication with 'sharded' data.
@Luis : Yes they are all on the same LAN.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Florent Krieg <flokrrr@gmail.com <mailto:flokrrr@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
I don't know very well Postgres but I achieved pretty much the same (horizontal scaling) with a MySQL cluster. Replication is a bit painful to setup and to maintain (especially master master, including db desynchronization when crashes occur and so on). I would go for a cluster, almost endlessly scalable and very very reliable. It is more costly to setup but I think it is worth the pain.
My feelings, I don't pretend to be a reference though :)
Florent
Le 2 janv. 2015 20:42, "Ashwin Rath" <ashwinrath@gmail.com <mailto: ashwinrath@gmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- *Rainer Piper* Integration engineer Koeslinstr. 56 53123 BONN GERMANY Phone: +49 228 97167161 <callto:004922897167161> P2P: sip:rainer@sip.soho-piper.de:5072 (pjsip-test) XMPP: rainer@xmpp.soho-piper.de
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger nneul@mst.edu Missouri S&T Information Technology (573) 612-1412 System Administrator - Architect
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
Adding that i am using the following add on to postgres for master master replication : http://2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/bdr/ On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Nathan Neulinger <nneul@mst.edu> wrote:
I'm currently using Percona XTraDB cluster in a 3 node setup as backend for FS, with keepalived used for managing the live database IP. How is the stability/maturity of the MariaDB implementation?
What are you using to manage the the rapid failover between DB nodes/ip failover?
-- Nathan
On 01/03/2015 01:21 AM, Rainer Piper wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
take a look at mariaDB Galera Multi-Master Cluster 10.0.15. I run 2x Cluster and each Cluster with 6x DB Nodes. A total of 12x DB Server
mariaDB Galera Multi-Master Cluster
Features
* Synchronous replication * Active-active multi-master topology * Read and write to any cluster node * Automatic membership control, failed nodes drop from the cluster * Automatic node joining * T*rue parallel replication, on row level !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!* * Direct client connections, native MySQL look & feel
Benefits
The above features yield several benefits for a DBMS clustering solution, including:
* No slave lag * No lost transactions * Both read and write scalability * Smaller client latencies
source: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/documentation/replication/galera/what-is-m...
Regards Rainer Piper
Am 03.01.2015 um 07:38 schrieb Ashwin Rath:
Thenk you all. My main concern was that master master replication is something that is used for a dual redundant deployment . Just not sure if it is reliable with multiple boxes . I have read about people having good luck with xtradb (percona) for MySQL but i think the general opinion is in favor of a cluster than having master-master replication with 'sharded' data.
@Luis : Yes they are all on the same LAN.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Florent Krieg <flokrrr@gmail.com <mailto:flokrrr@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
I don't know very well Postgres but I achieved pretty much the same (horizontal scaling) with a MySQL cluster. Replication is a bit painful to setup and to maintain (especially master master, including db desynchronization when crashes occur and so on). I would go for a cluster, almost endlessly scalable and very very reliable. It is more costly to setup but I think it is worth the pain.
My feelings, I don't pretend to be a reference though :)
Florent
Le 2 janv. 2015 20:42, "Ashwin Rath" <ashwinrath@gmail.com <mailto: ashwinrath@gmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- *Rainer Piper* Integration engineer Koeslinstr. 56 53123 BONN GERMANY Phone: +49 228 97167161 <callto:004922897167161> P2P: sip:rainer@sip.soho-piper.de:5072 (pjsip-test) XMPP: rainer@xmpp.soho-piper.de
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger nneul@mst.edu Missouri S&T Information Technology (573) 612-1412 System Administrator - Architect
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
participants (6)
-
Ashwin Rath
-
Florent Krieg
-
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
-
Nathan Neulinger
-
Rainer Piper
-
Vik Killa