Hi Ashwin, I don't know very well Postgres but I achieved pretty much the same (horizontal scaling) with a MySQL cluster. Replication is a bit painful to setup and to maintain (especially master master, including db desynchronization when crashes occur and so on). I would go for a cluster, almost endlessly scalable and very very reliable. It is more costly to setup but I think it is worth the pain. My feelings, I don't pretend to be a reference though :) Florent Le 2 janv. 2015 20:42, "Ashwin Rath" <ashwinrath@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org