"...ask if master master replication is reliable..." ^^^ this is more of a postgres question about master-master replication "..be a better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?" ^^^ i think it would be better to have a cluster that all FS servers connect to On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ashwin Rath <ashwinrath@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.
Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?
-- Ashwin Kumar Rath
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org