"...ask if master master replication is reliable..." 
^^^ this is more of a postgres question about master-master replication

"..be a better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?"
^^^ i think it would be better to have a cluster that all FS servers connect to



On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ashwin Rath <ashwinrath@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All

I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a load balancer depending on the load.

Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS nodes holding presence as well as session info ?

or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql cluster and point all FS to it ?


--
Ashwin Kumar Rath

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org