[Freeswitch-users] Difference between freeswitch.bridge and uuid_bridge, Blocking/ non-blocking bridge

[Stanislav Sinyagin]

It's not a direct answer to your question, but have a look here:
https://github.com/xlab1/freeswitch_secretary_bug

https://github.com/xlab1/go-fs-secretary-prototype
On Sep 20, 2014 9:46 PM, "Shreejisandy" <shreejisandy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I want to play some audio file to both the legs might be same or
> different,
>
> 1st option:
> i can do it by using uuid_bridge, audio file playback can be done using
> uuid_broadcast or sched_broadcast with +0. But using uuid bridge, the audio
> is not flowing correctly from B-leg to A-leg. while the audio flows
> flawless other ways(A-B leg). Also the audio file that i am playing to both
> legs are perfectly heard with out any problem. and after the audio
> playback, its the same audio flowing issue from B-A leg.
>
> 2nd option:
> or i can schedule it using sched_broadcast, if i am using
> freeswitch.bridge which is blocking in nature. Using this approach, There
> is no complaint of audio between call legs or playback of audio file.
>
> Hence i wanted to understand which bridge is better to use? and what is
> the difference between the two bridges?
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> 
> 
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140920/4a99ae5f/attachment.html