Yep and I¹m trying to figure out why... Currently everything is getting rebuilt, but as I said this takes several hours of processing time to complete and then I will reset the repo On 9/9/13 4:21 PM, "Steven Ayre" <steveayre@gmail.com> wrote:
I see 1.2.12 in the pool, but it isn't listed in the Packages file so apt doesn't find them.
http://files.freeswitch.org/repo/deb/debian/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/P... kages
On 9 September 2013 15:39, Ken Rice <krice@freeswitch.org> wrote:
it is kept up to date in fact its getting resyned again to make sure its up to date... however it does take time for this stuff to build and propogate
Ken Sent from my iPad
On Sep 9, 2013, at 7:46, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
We have no excuses to not keep our repo up to date. If this still isn't resolved let me know please.
Mike
On Sep 9, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Andrew Cassidy <andrew@cassidywebservices.co.uk> wrote:
Indeed, having our own repo is adequate, but as mentioned earlier, it's not been kept up to date. Because it is a lot of work even just to maintain what we already have.
On 9 September 2013 13:12, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
Thats correct, every time someone comes around suggesting we get package in the distro repos, I mention this needs to get done first and if someone wants to do the work on that then we can discuss what else is necessary to get packages upstream, and them everyone realizes its a lot of work and wanders off without offering to help, so it probably will never happen. I'm not sure it actually adds any value anyways.
Mike
On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:32 AM, Andrew Cassidy <andrew@cassidywebservices.co.uk> wrote:
Last I heard there were concerns around some of the custom patches to upstream libraries used in FreeSWITCH that was blocking getting packages into the official repo?
The other issue is by getting into debian repositories, we're pretty much obliged to backport security patches between debian releases.
On 8 September 2013 06:39, Gabriel Gunderson <gabe@gundy.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Karl Schmidt <karl@xtronics.com> wrote: >> > On 09/07/2013 04:16 PM, Gabriel Gunderson wrote: >>> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Karl Schmidt <karl@xtronics.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> My take is 286 packages is too many. Compare it to Apache - lots >>>> of complicated bits can be added >>>> >>> - but the package count isn't even close. >>> >> >>> >> Why is that too many? Being granular is a good thing. >> > >> > I think you are missing my point - Debian will not accept 280 >> packages for freeswitch. Ask the >> > ftp-masters. The packaging system is not intended to provide >> fine-grained granularity. > > There was no discussion of Debian accepting packages or not. So, yeah, > I would have missed that point. > > > >> > I am quite thankful to the maintainers - and my advice is an attempt >> to help them get freeswitch >> > into Debian. > > They're making lots of progress in this area. Of course, any help is > welcomed. > > > Best, > Gabe > > ________________________________________________________________________>>>>>>> _ > Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: > consulting@freeswitch.org > http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com <http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com/> > > FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server > http://www.cudatel.com <http://www.cudatel.com/> > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org/> > http://wiki.freeswitch.org <http://wiki.freeswitch.org/> > http://www.cluecon.com <http://www.cluecon.com/> > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org/>
-- Ken http://www.FreeSWITCH.org http://www.ClueCon.com http://www.OSTAG.org irc.freenode.net #freeswitch