It was already correctly confirmed in this thread.
On Jan 31, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Regis M <regis.freeswitch.org@tornad.net> wrote:
It's not paranoid, it's a logic and normal question.
For me, but as to be confirmed by freeswitch dev and c expert, FS compile with linked library by default. And doing : $ ldd <path_to_fs>/bin/freeswitch show you the linked librairy with your binary on your system.
If someone else can confirm my post too, I'm not 100% sure.
Thanks
2015-01-30 21:01 GMT+01:00 Oleg Stolyar <olegstolyar@gmail.com <mailto:olegstolyar@gmail.com>>: Yep, just being paranoid and want to absolutely confirm that the standard FreeSWITCH build links libraries (including glibc) dynamically.
On Jan 30, 2015 11:39 AM, "Sergey Okhapkin" <sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org <mailto:sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org>> wrote: There is no need to rebuild an application linked against a dynamic library.
On Friday 30 January 2015 11:30:28 Oleg Stolyar wrote:
Sorry if the question is naive - trying to be paranoid here.
On my CentOS machines I updated my glibc version to one that fixed the GHOST vulnerability.
Do I need to rebuild FS or is the library linked dynamically, so there is no need to rebuild?