On Jan 31, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Regis M <regis.freeswitch.org@tornad.net> wrote:It's not paranoid, it's a logic and normal question.For me, but as to be confirmed by freeswitch dev and c expert, FS compile with linked library by default. And doing :$ ldd <path_to_fs>/bin/freeswitchshow you the linked librairy with your binary on your system.If someone else can confirm my post too, I'm not 100% sure.Thanks2015-01-30 21:01 GMT+01:00 Oleg Stolyar <olegstolyar@gmail.com>:Yep, just being paranoid and want to absolutely confirm that the standard FreeSWITCH build links libraries (including glibc) dynamically.
On Jan 30, 2015 11:39 AM, "Sergey Okhapkin" <sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org> wrote:There is no need to rebuild an application linked against a dynamic library.
On Friday 30 January 2015 11:30:28 Oleg Stolyar wrote:
> Sorry if the question is naive - trying to be paranoid here.
>
> On my CentOS machines I updated my glibc version to one that fixed the
> GHOST vulnerability.
>
> Do I need to rebuild FS or is the library linked dynamically, so there is
> no need to rebuild?