LIke bkw and anthm said, at fs_cli: conference <conf_name> record <file_name> Problem solved, no? -MC On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Rob Morin <rmorin@blie-ent.com> wrote:
Requiring 2*n g729 licenses because of the way it is built into the conference is exactly the point. I'm wondering, is there legally a way to alter the implementation such that n+1 is the proper number of licenses? Would creating a "phantom channel" for the recording achieve that?
Just a thought, Rob
-----Original Message----- From: Brian West [mailto:brian@freeswitch.org] Sent: 09/29/2010 5:27 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] serious problem in record_session
You know recording is built into the conference itself.
/b
On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Rob Morin wrote:
Two items, one for John, and one for the community:
1. Did you (John) ever get this working?
2. There has been discussion that if the calls are g729, that 2*n licenses are required (where n is the number of legs on a conference call). Would it be possible, and legal, to use an implementation such as this to create an extension that gets recorded such that the number of licenses required to record a conference call would be n+1, rather than n*2?
Thank you, Rob Morin
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org