LIke bkw and anthm said, at fs_cli:

conference <conf_name> record <file_name>

Problem solved, no?

-MC

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Rob Morin <rmorin@blie-ent.com> wrote:
Requiring 2*n g729 licenses because of the way it is built into the
conference is exactly the point. I'm wondering, is there legally a way to
alter the implementation such that n+1 is the proper number of licenses?
Would creating a "phantom channel" for the recording achieve that?

Just a thought,
Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian West [mailto:brian@freeswitch.org]
Sent: 09/29/2010 5:27 PM
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] serious problem in record_session

You know recording is built into the conference itself.

/b

On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Rob Morin wrote:

> Two items, one for John, and one for the community:
>
> 1. Did you (John) ever get this working?
>
> 2. There has been discussion that if the calls are g729, that 2*n
> licenses are required (where n is the number of legs on a conference
> call). Would it be possible, and legal, to use an implementation such
> as this to create an extension that gets recorded such that the number
> of licenses required to record a conference call would be n+1, rather than
n*2?
>
> Thank you,
> Rob Morin





_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org