We have no plans to make major changes in this space.
On Jan 17, 2017, at 8:10 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
This questions for FS core developers. I found that FreeSwitch apr libs have apr_pool_mutex_set that not exists in APR master. I found commit <https://freeswitch.org/stash/projects/FS/repos/freeswitch/commits/ffb1cb4f690473af696fe1fe3879790fe49acecb> where this function is introduced. Purpose of this commit is resolve concurrency access from different threads to same memory pool.
I asked <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201701.mbox/%3CCAHtxdDfDwmoACnYn04FTWWgtpK8giJjsgSgg5VvuSN%2Bph4G%3DBw%40mail.gmail.com%3E> APR community why not used mutex and got responce from William A Rowe <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201701.mbox/%3CCACsi2539CFJusRo0wmReEEdrdG5ppJsJb-C9aD-g7K6tFos%2BOA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
My questions Does core team developers planning rewrite memory pool operation to remove shared access to same pool from different threads? Create own pool for each thread.
Sergey _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org