Hit "send" to soon... :) What I meant to say last was that I recommend using Windows 2008 R2, or at least Windows 2008. Microsoft has improved their timing in the kernel, starting with these kernels (and also Vista / Windows 7). /Peter ________________________________ Från: Peter Olsson Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 15:02 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: RE: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version I would say it's more or less the same (FS build natively on both platforms). I'm using it on both platforms, and it's been working perfect on both. There is a bigger user base on Linux I guess (if that's important), and if you want to run HA-setups, you would need Linux to setup Kamailio etc. If you're running Windows, I recommend ________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Albert Nguyen [albert_nguyen16@hotmail.com] Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 13:47 Till: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version Hi I have installed a FS windows version on a DELL R210 server running windows 2003 server. Is there any different between the FS windows and linux version in term of capability and performance? Thanks in advance, Al !DSPAM:4fc214f832761559443750!