Hit "send" to soon... :) What I meant to say last was that I recommend using Windows 2008 R2, or at least Windows 2008. Microsoft has improved their timing in the kernel, starting with these kernels (and also Vista / Windows 7). /Peter ________________________________ Från: Peter Olsson Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 15:02 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: RE: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version I would say it's more or less the same (FS build natively on both platforms). I'm using it on both platforms, and it's been working perfect on both. There is a bigger user base on Linux I guess (if that's important), and if you want to run HA-setups, you would need Linux to setup Kamailio etc. If you're running Windows, I recommend ________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Albert Nguyen [albert_nguyen16@hotmail.com] Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 13:47 Till: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version Hi I have installed a FS windows version on a DELL R210 server running windows 2003 server. Is there any different between the FS windows and linux version in term of capability and performance? Thanks in advance, Al !DSPAM:4fc214f832761559443750!

Just to chime in a little. 2008 R2 it will kick ass, or of you are using an earlier version, of windows, at least use an x64 one. You can also use Win7 X64, and should get about the same results. FreeSWITCH will also run fine on windows as a Hyper-V virtual machine, with no timing or other issues. Also the HA stuff works the same, at least on the FS side, and there is no reason that you couldn't write a simple module using mod_managed and C# to integrate to windows clustering. That will give you the IP address fallover from one system to the other builtin. You would just have to subscribe to the event for the cluster node becoming active, and issue the API command to restore the active calls. I haven't tested that yet, but it's on my todo list. --Dave _____ From: Albert Nguyen [mailto:albert_nguyen16@hotmail.com] To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Sent: Sun, 27 May 2012 06:15:35 -0700 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version Hi Peter, Thanks very much for your info. I'll put it on win 2008 R2. Regards, Al

From: peter.olsson@visionutveckling.se To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 13:05:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version

Hit "send" to soon... :)

What I meant to say last was that I recommend using Windows 2008 R2, or at least Windows 2008. Microsoft has improved their timing in the kernel, starting with these kernels (and also Vista / Windows 7).

/Peter ________________________________ Från: Peter Olsson Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 15:02 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: RE: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version

I would say it's more or less the same (FS build natively on both platforms).

I'm using it on both platforms, and it's been working perfect on both. There is a bigger user base on Linux I guess (if that's important), and if you want to run HA-setups, you would need Linux to setup Kamailio etc.

If you're running Windows, I recommend

________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Albert Nguyen [albert_nguyen16@hotmail.com] Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 13:47 Till: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version

Hi

I have installed a FS windows version on a DELL R210 server running windows 2003 server. Is there any different between the FS windows and linux version in term of capability and performance?

Thanks in advance,

Al !DSPAM:4fc214f832761559443750!

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

Great info Dave, much appreciated. As far as timing goes with Hyper-V, have you messed at all with T.38 or any faxing stuff? Thanks, -Chris ___________________ Mobile Reply On May 27, 2012, at 12:33 PM, "Dave R. Kompel" <drk@drkngs.net> wrote: Just to chime in a little. 2008 R2 it will kick ass, or of you are using an earlier version, of windows, at least use an x64 one. You can also use Win7 X64, and should get about the same results. FreeSWITCH will also run fine on windows as a Hyper-V virtual machine, with no timing or other issues. Also the HA stuff works the same, at least on the FS side, and there is no reason that you couldn't write a simple module using mod_managed and C# to integrate to windows clustering. That will give you the IP address fallover from one system to the other builtin. You would just have to subscribe to the event for the cluster node becoming active, and issue the API command to restore the active calls. I haven't tested that yet, but it's on my todo list. --Dave ------------------------------ *From:* Albert Nguyen [mailto:albert_nguyen16@hotmail.com] *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org *Sent:* Sun, 27 May 2012 06:15:35 -0700 *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version Hi Peter, Thanks very much for your info. I'll put it on win 2008 R2. Regards, Al

From: peter.olsson@visionutveckling.se To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 13:05:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version

Hit "send" to soon... :)

What I meant to say last was that I recommend using Windows 2008 R2, or at least Windows 2008. Microsoft has improved their timing in the kernel, starting with these kernels (and also Vista / Windows 7).

/Peter ________________________________ Från: Peter Olsson Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 15:02 Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help Ämne: RE: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version

I would say it's more or less the same (FS build natively on both platforms).

I'm using it on both platforms, and it's been working perfect on both. There is a bigger user base on Linux I guess (if that's important), and if you want to run HA-setups, you would need Linux to setup Kamailio etc.

If you're running Windows, I recommend

________________________________ Från: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [ freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] för Albert Nguyen [ albert_nguyen16@hotmail.com] Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 13:47 Till: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version

Hi

I have installed a FS windows version on a DELL R210 server running windows 2003 server. Is there any different between the FS windows and linux version in term of capability and performance?

Thanks in advance,

Al !DSPAM:4fc214f832761559443750!

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

If you are using the dialplan application "start_dtmf" then it applies only to the current, existing channel. So no, you don't have to explicitly call stop_dtmf, especially after the call has ended! :) -MC On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Albert Nguyen <albert_nguyen16@hotmail.com>wrote:

Hi,

I am using start_DTMF to convert inband DTMF to RFC 2833 for calls. Just wanted to make sure :-), when a call is ended by FS (i.e [CS_DESTROY]), would this will also automatically stop the DTMF conversion function or do I have to explicitly using stop_DTMF ?

Thanks in advance.

Al

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com

Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org