9 Jan
2009
9 Jan
'09
8:11 p.m.
We do not do line-seize. Why impose artificial limitations? You can accomplish pickup and such using nothing but dialplan thats how we do it with Snom. /b On Jan 9, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Thanks, I'll play with that and see if I can get enough working to solve my current needs.
I think the bigger issue is that when I see "shared line appearance" and "bridged line appearance" in a features list, I think of call appearances with key-system-like shared extensions with busy lamps and barge-in-on-pickup, which I gather requires some broadsoft-authored SIP extensions (including line-seize events) which don't appear to be supported.
Of course, the source code's all there...
Matthew Kaufman