Can FreeSWITCH and Polycom's line type="shared" work together? If so, how do I get there from here? I've tried registering as the same extension with multiple registrations enabled, registering as different extensions with the first extension set as the third-party in the second... looked at how manage-presence works... noted that the line-seize event returns an error because that's not an event that's registered for... etc. None of it gets me having it do what I want, which is seeing the status of the one on the other, and from watching the SIP I'm not seeing how it could work anyway in any of the configurations I've tried... I assume I am missing something in the dialplan that tells it to notify the others when something happens on the first (given that line-seize doesn't do anything, so the only way to know is if the first either gets a call or places one, which must go via the dialplan), and if that's the case are there any examples of this? Matthew Kaufman
On 1/9/2009 2:19 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Can FreeSWITCH and Polycom's line type="shared" work together? If so, how do I get there from here?
[snip] Shared line, I don't know. But if you just want BLF support (see the state of the other line), try the guide I wrote on the wiki. It is for the 320, but seems to work for other polycom phones as well. http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Polycom_Presence_Setup
Matthew Kaufman
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Rupa Schomaker (lists) wrote:
Shared line, I don't know. But if you just want BLF support (see the state of the other line), try the guide I wrote on the wiki. It is for the 320, but seems to work for other polycom phones as well.
Thanks, I'll play with that and see if I can get enough working to solve my current needs. I think the bigger issue is that when I see "shared line appearance" and "bridged line appearance" in a features list, I think of call appearances with key-system-like shared extensions with busy lamps and barge-in-on-pickup, which I gather requires some broadsoft-authored SIP extensions (including line-seize events) which don't appear to be supported. Of course, the source code's all there... Matthew Kaufman
On 1/9/2009 12:47 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Rupa Schomaker (lists) wrote:
Shared line, I don't know. But if you just want BLF support (see the state of the other line), try the guide I wrote on the wiki. It is for the 320, but seems to work for other polycom phones as well.
Thanks, I'll play with that and see if I can get enough working to solve my current needs.
I think the bigger issue is that when I see "shared line appearance" and "bridged line appearance" in a features list, I think of call appearances with key-system-like shared extensions with busy lamps and barge-in-on-pickup, which I gather requires some broadsoft-authored SIP extensions (including line-seize events) which don't appear to be supported.
Right. So you'll get the lights with this setup but not full SLA/BLA where you can barge in on the line. I think there are ways to do it with snom phones and perhaps others but I only have one poly so can't do anything in that department for 'em.
Of course, the source code's all there...
beauty of open source
Matthew Kaufman
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
We do not do line-seize. Why impose artificial limitations? You can accomplish pickup and such using nothing but dialplan thats how we do it with Snom. /b On Jan 9, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Thanks, I'll play with that and see if I can get enough working to solve my current needs.
I think the bigger issue is that when I see "shared line appearance" and "bridged line appearance" in a features list, I think of call appearances with key-system-like shared extensions with busy lamps and barge-in-on-pickup, which I gather requires some broadsoft-authored SIP extensions (including line-seize events) which don't appear to be supported.
Of course, the source code's all there...
Matthew Kaufman
Brian West wrote:
We do not do line-seize. Why impose artificial limitations? You can accomplish pickup and such using nothing but dialplan thats how we do it with Snom.
Ok, so how do I configure two phones to each have a single extension button that represents the same extension (labeled as such), and which shows status (on that same line button) of the other extension? The BLF examples appear to require that I monitor the busy status of the other extension on something other than the extension line button (something configured as a speed-dial), as far as I can tell. It also seems that to get this to work, each phone needs to be at its own extension but have the label overridden to show the effective extension number that I want them to think they're at, rather than multiple registration of the same extension, correct? (This appears to be true even if true "shared line" support existed, if I'm reading documentation right) Matthew Kaufman
participants (3)
-
Brian West
-
Matthew Kaufman
-
Rupa Schomaker (lists)