It's the first time I hear about SaltStack. Can you briefly explain why is it better than Puppet or Chef. I would pick Chef out of the 2 because it's using Ruby natively and is being adapted by Amazon AWS. So if you ever need some kind of hybrid architecture to run production or development servers on AWS, you will spend minimal effort for deploying those given that you can reuse your Chef cookbooks. Henry On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Gabriel Gunderson <gabe@gundy.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <cal.leeming@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
I'm still not entirely happy with the overall procedure and always looking for new/better ways to improve it.. but SaltStack is a clear winner, leaving puppet/chef in it's dust.
Sounds like you're getting close to being happy :)
When we do some Salt Modules and States specific to OpenSIP and FreeSWITCH, we'll be sure to open source them.
Happy hacking!
Gabe
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org