It's the first time I hear about SaltStack. Can you briefly explain why is it better than Puppet or Chef. I would pick Chef out of the 2 because it's using Ruby natively and is being adapted by Amazon AWS. So if you ever need some kind of hybrid architecture to run production or development servers on AWS, you will spend minimal effort for deploying those given that you can reuse your Chef cookbooks.

Henry

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Gabriel Gunderson <gabe@gundy.org> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
<cal.leeming@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm still not entirely happy with the overall procedure and always looking
> for new/better ways to improve it.. but SaltStack is a clear winner, leaving
> puppet/chef in it's dust.

Sounds like you're getting close to being happy :)

When we do some Salt Modules and States specific to OpenSIP and
FreeSWITCH, we'll be sure to open source them.

Happy hacking!

Gabe

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org