What if by violating an RFC one gets higher scalability and reliability - would it harm anybody? I only care about bottom line end of the day results. being lightweight highly important in my case. Thank you all for your prompt responsiveness -- freeSwitch community seems to make a good feeling to new comers. On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Doing so will cause your install to violate the RFC. But you asked so here you go.
<param name="bind-params" value="transport=udp"/> on the profile should do what you want.
Remember the RFC says that TCP is NOT optional and is required to be RFC compliant. ;)
/b
On Jul 30, 2008, at 8:53 AM, afro.systems@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
A newbie question,
Is it possible to configure FreeSwitch to be using UDP only even fore the signaling?
-- Tzury Bar Yochay _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Brian West sip:brian@freeswitch.org <sip%3Abrian@freeswitch.org>
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Tzury Bar Yochay