What if by violating an RFC one gets higher scalability and reliability - would it harm anybody?
I only care about bottom line end of the day results. being lightweight highly important in my case.

Thank you all for your prompt responsiveness  -- freeSwitch community seems to make a good feeling to new comers.

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Doing so will cause your install to violate the RFC.  But you asked so
here you go.

<param name="bind-params" value="transport=udp"/> on the profile
should do what you want.

Remember the RFC says that TCP is NOT optional and is required to be
RFC compliant. ;)

/b

On Jul 30, 2008, at 8:53 AM, afro.systems@gmail.com wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> A newbie question,
>
> Is it possible to configure FreeSwitch to be using UDP only even
> fore the signaling?
>
>
> --
> Tzury Bar Yochay
Brian West
sip:brian@freeswitch.org



--
Tzury Bar Yochay