I can't think of anything else bound to those ports on that interface !! My box is multihomed so all syslog etcet is on one interface .. Customer facing on another , internal facing on a third interface ... So the chances of another process holding these ports is unlikely ( especially since these boxes are dedicated SBCs ) On 15 Oct 2015 10:32 pm, "Michael Jerris" <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
overhead to check every time we go to use a port
On Thursday, October 15, 2015, jay binks <jaybinks@gmail.com> wrote:
Awesome !!! Thanks !!! Does this have any particularly adverse affect ???
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:17 Aqs Younas <aqsyounas@gmail.com> wrote:
Uncomment the following line in switch.conf.xml.
<!-- Test each port to make sure it is not in use by some other process before allocating it to RTP -->
<!-- <param name="rtp-port-usage-robustness" value="true"/> --> _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org