I can't think of anything else bound to those ports on that interface !! My box is multihomed so all syslog etcet is on one interface ..

Customer facing on another , internal facing on a third interface ... So the chances of another process holding these ports is unlikely

( especially since these boxes are dedicated SBCs )

On 15 Oct 2015 10:32 pm, "Michael Jerris" <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
overhead to check every time we go to use a port

On Thursday, October 15, 2015, jay binks <jaybinks@gmail.com> wrote:

Awesome !!! Thanks !!! Does this have any particularly adverse affect ???


On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:17 Aqs Younas <aqsyounas@gmail.com> wrote:
Uncomment the following line in switch.conf.xml.

<!-- Test each port to make sure it is not in use by some other process before allocating it to RTP -->

<!-- <param name="rtp-port-usage-robustness" value="true"/> -->
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org