On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 22:21, Anton VG <anton.vazir@gmail.com> wrote:
zyxel have what you ask. Huawei have better pricing (~20$ per port) but huawei wants to sell huge amounts and quality is somehow bad.
Zyxel is quite good (did not try ZyXEL Voip features, only ADSL) but ADSL is good and reliable, but more expensive per port. There are options for 12/24/48 and modular 300+ ports
2011/6/20 Matthew S. Crocker <matthew@corp.crocker.com>:
Zhone MALC-XP are nowhere near $11k. They are < $100/port
________________________________
From: "David Ponzone" <david.ponzone@ipeva.fr> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 5:29:48 AM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoIP IP DSLAMs
Hmmm unlikely I think. The Zhone box for instance seems to be around 11,000$. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou
diffusion
non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur.
Le 17/06/2011 à 10:25, Nandy Dagondon a écrit :
yes, it doesn't add up because the application is in a rural area. the Phybridge is a good solution except for the price. thanks David. however, the MSAN, perfectly describes what i'm looking - hopefully the investment is lower. thanks to all who contributed.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, David Ponzone <david.ponzone@ipeva.fr> wrote:
Nandy, something does not add up. When you deploy DSLAMs for public lines, it's not for 24/48 ports, but rather for 20 000 to 30 000 ports. Perhaps there is a confusion about what is a public line. A public line is the 200 meters-8km pair of copper going from the local (legacy) telco facility to your house. You don't install your own DSLAMs for 24/48 ports, or perhaps you are in
a
very specific situation. I really doubt you will find a cost effective DSLAM for so few ports. Plus, you realize you will need to install on DSLAM in all the telco facilities required to get the coverage you need There are small DSLAMs on the market, but they are targeted for private lines (hospitality, health care, ...) and I really don't know if they can work on public lines. In case you actually need a small DSLAM just to run ADSL over a private pair of copper, you should have a look at: http://www.phybridge.com/uniphyer-ip-phones.aspx This thing does not call itself a DSLAM but it is one. They market that as a "switch" that enables LAN on your copper wires. It's a small lie for data usage as you only get 25Mbps/1.4Mbps (ATM), but for voice, that's enough. Basically, you put the "switch"-DSLAM in the network cabinet where the copper wires go, you connect the wires to it, you connect the ethernet port to your LAN (so your FS). In each room/office, you plug an adapter (provided also by Phybridge) which is basically a small ADSL modem (powered from the switch through the wire), from which you get an ethernet port, with POE on it! I like the solution on the paper, but never used. Because of the cost: a 24 ports switch is 3500$ one adapter is 122$ so a full 24 ports solution would be 6500$, which is not very competitive compared to recabling the place. But your mileage may vary. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur.
Le 17/06/2011 à 08:28, Nandy Dagondon a écrit :
yes, without ATM layer and it's for public lines.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, David Ponzone <david.ponzone@ipeva.fr> wrote:
Which density are you looking for ? Is it for use in a private building or on public lines ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou
diffusion
non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur.
Le 17/06/2011 à 08:07, Nandy Dagondon a écrit :
hello guys!
i'm trying to setup a small exchange w/ Internet service - of course, using FS as the exchange. DSLAMs connect to POTS via 2-wire splitters and that would require using FXS gateway (as what Rob mentioned).
i'm trying to find out if there's a way we can omit the FXS - so it's FS-to-DSLAM direct via IP. i'm not sure if this setup is now possible on newer IP DSLAMs.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, jay binks <jaybinks@gmail.com> wrote:
this is MY take on what Nandy is after. A Dslam provides DSL on certain frequencies of the line.. ( some of ) the other frequencies are used for voice. my understanding is that sometimes this is split off to another device to provide the voice, but in this case Nandy is after a DSlam that will do the DSL part AND the voice frequencies ( Voice signalling / audio by SIP / RTP ) I guess this is a logical question and would be quite interesting to
see
if there are such devices.. sorry I dont know of any :( Jay
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Hutton <justlikeef@gmail.com> wrote:
Can you explain further what you are trying to do? A DSLAM is a
device
that provides DSL transport, which is independent of what you run across it. So normally, you have
|Server | ----|network|----|DSLAM| --------[dsl line] -------[modem or modem/router combo]-----[network]---[Client]
What the Server is (Could be Freeswitch) and what the Client is (could be a VOIP phone) are independent of the transport??? Onewire, Cisco, and others make some DSL Modem/Router combos with integrated Voip to FXS ports for the CPE end.
If you find a DSLAM running one of the OSs that Freeswitch supports, you could compile Freeswitch for it, but I haven't seen one with enough CPU tp handle much besides the traffic.
On Thursday 16 June 2011 19:03:50 Nandy Dagondon wrote: > hello everybody, > > i'm looking for small (24/48 ports) IP DSLAMs that inter-connects > directly > to FreeSwitch via IP. is this already available on the market? or do > we > still have to connect FreeSwitch via POTS splitters and FXS gateways? > i > appreciate if you can mention some brands/models. > > tks, > nandy
-- Sincerely
Jay
Very informative discussion. :) Can someone also share their experience on Fibre Optic based vendors / solutions? Regards HASSAN