My personal opinion is this: if you just want a basic pbx w/ pretty interface then use blue.box. If you want to learn more about the guts of FreeSWITCH then use FusionPBX. Fusion is based loosely on the default configuration of FS - the so-called "vanilla" config. It lets you see a lot more of what's going on. In some respects it's more "complete" in that it exposes just about everything you can do in FS. I would actually try them both out. I don't know how easily they can handle your TDM card, etc. as I've never done TDM with either of them. Hope this helps... -MC On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Bzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:22:52 -0700 Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Of the two, blue.box does more abstracting away of the underlying FreeSWITCH configs.
Hmm, you also must be able to install it, which wasn't the case for me (Debian sid): I never even had the first screen (tested w/ nginx, lighttpd & apache2:( On the other hand, FusionPBX installation was a piece of cake.
My €0.015743
JY -- Hate the sin and love the sinner. -- Mahatma Gandhi
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org