My personal opinion is this: if you just want a basic pbx w/ pretty interface then use blue.box. If you want to learn more about the guts of FreeSWITCH then use FusionPBX. Fusion is based loosely on the default configuration of FS - the so-called "vanilla" config. It lets you see a lot more of what's going on. In some respects it's more "complete" in that it exposes just about everything you can do in FS. I would actually try them both out. I don't know how easily they can handle your TDM card, etc. as I've never done TDM with either of them.

Hope this helps...

-MC

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Bzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:22:52 -0700
Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:

>  Of the two, blue.box does more abstracting away of
> the underlying FreeSWITCH configs.

Hmm, you also must be able to install it, which wasn't the case for
me (Debian sid): I never even had the first screen (tested w/ nginx,
lighttpd & apache2:(
On the other hand, FusionPBX installation was a piece of cake.

My €0.015743

JY
--
Hate the sin and love the sinner.
               -- Mahatma Gandhi

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org