Improvements yes, but that's their BladewareVXML. They have done a bit of work on that + the version of OpenVXI I talk about is the one from 2003 without the GPL license. Jan -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood Sent: 10. juli 2010 18:41 To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIP2VXML On 07/10/2010 08:50 PM, Jan Berger wrote:
I don't use OpenVXI for reasons like - dead project, performance, reliability, non-scaling architecture, wrong dependencies - and so on. We have a target of 20,000 sessions on my laptop alone - and I have already secured that and more. We can do more, but we start running out of memory. What I expect out of FreeSWITCH/CCXML/VXML is that we can scale up as much as FreeSWITCH can without CCXML/VXML being the show-stopper.
The folk at Commetrex might disagree with your first 4 complaints. They claim huge performance, reliability and scaling improvements in the version of OpenVXI they are pushing forward.
Then OpenVXI came out it was adopted by tier1 companies that still use the stack today. Some people consider that a reference, but they fail to understand that those companies have the strength needed to pick up half-done-work and make it right. Though the ones I know of still struggle with performance issues.
<snip>
So when it was first invented, people tried to sell the editors for money, the only implementation were commercial and there was no real acceptance to it. The first open source VXML stack was dependency-ridden and archaic to even build for many years.
</snip>
Steve _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org