So, is this advice for EC2 wrong? https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Amazon_EC2 *conf/sip_profiles/external.xml* <param name="aggressive-nat-detection" value="true"/> <param name="ext-rtp-ip" value="$${external_rtp_ip}"/> <param name="ext-sip-ip" value="$${external_sip_ip}"/> <param name="NDLB-force-rport" value="true"/> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Never set this aggressive nat...
Use rfc1918.auto acl.
On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:18 PM, Miguel Oyarzo <miguelaustro@gmail.com> wrote:
<param name="aggressive-nat-detection" value="true"/>
-- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org
Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest http://www.freeswitchbook.com http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com
T: +1.918.420.9001 | F: +1.918.420.9002 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9001 ISN: 410*543 Skype:briankwest PGP Key: http://www.bkw.org/key.txt (AB93356707C76CED)
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- "Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things (Peter Drucker)" Miguel Oyarzo DevOps & VoIP Engineer Linux User: # 483188 - counter.li.org http://au.linkedin.com/in/mikeaustralia Melbourne, Australia
