So, is this advice for EC2 wrong?

https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Amazon_EC2

conf/sip_profiles/external.xml

<param name="aggressive-nat-detection" value="true"/>
<param name="ext-rtp-ip" value="$${external_rtp_ip}"/>
<param name="ext-sip-ip" value="$${external_sip_ip}"/>
<param name="NDLB-force-rport" value="true"/>




On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Never set this aggressive nat...

Use rfc1918.auto acl.

On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:18 PM, Miguel Oyarzo <miguelaustro@gmail.com> wrote:

<param name="aggressive-nat-detection" value="true"/>



--
Brian West
brian@freeswitch.org



Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest
http://www.freeswitchbook.com
http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com

T: +1.918.420.9001  |  F: +1.918.420.9002  |  M: +1.918.424.WEST
iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9001
ISN: 410*543
Skype:briankwest
PGP Key: http://www.bkw.org/key.txt (AB93356707C76CED)
















_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
"Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things (Peter Drucker)"

Miguel Oyarzo
DevOps & VoIP Engineer
Linux User: # 483188 - counter.li.org
http://au.linkedin.com/in/mikeaustralia 
Melbourne, Australia