did you try restricted ( address, port ) cone NAT and Symmetric NAT as well ? i guess for Symmetric we do need a TURN server... not sure about other NAT types/Methods of translation On 16 June 2017 at 20:52, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
Many carrier use this NAT schema. At home i have double NAT. 1) my home WiFi router 2) carrier cone NAT
All works as expected. Tested WebRTC (sipML5) and Verto.
пт, 16 июн. 2017 г. в 12:01, Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga@gmail.com>:
hello,
does anyone have experience with WebRTC via carrier NAT ?
client_LAN(192.168.x.y) <NAT> carrer_prvate_WAN(10.x.x.x) <NAT> carrier_public_WAN(public_ip) <> internet
in this scenario, WebRTC calls using STUN only will not work. What about TURN ?
did anyone try that ?
Regards, Tihomir. _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org