Many carrier use this NAT schema.

At home i have double NAT.

1) my home WiFi router

2) carrier cone NAT 

All works as expected. Tested WebRTC (sipML5) and Verto.

пт, 16 июн. 2017 г. в 12:01, Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga@gmail.com>:

hello,

does anyone have experience with WebRTC via carrier NAT ?

client_LAN(192.168.x.y) <NAT> carrer_prvate_WAN(10.x.x.x) <NAT> carrier_public_WAN(public_ip) <> internet

in this scenario, WebRTC calls using STUN only will not work. What about TURN ?

did anyone try that ?

Regards,

Tihomir.

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org